Right Wing Media FAKEST OF THE FAKE!

[SlimTrae]

THE FACTS WON'T STOP!!

Those who claim Stolen Election have watched their sources- one by one denounce their own sources!

1. A lot of Republican voters believe this election was rigged.

Now, how did they come to this conclusion? Wasn't CNN, MSNBC, ABC,NBC. It came about from people like attorney Sidney Powell. she claimed fraud.
Question who reported it? Who entertained it? FOX, OAN, Right Wing radio to name a few.

And what did Trump team do to solidify their faith in her? Trump legal team let her go.

When it came time to prove her point-

This was in Powell’s motion for dismissaletermining whether a statement is protected involves a two-step inquiry: Is the statement one which can be proved true or false? And would reasonable people conclude that the statement is one of fact, in light of its phrasing, context, and the circumstances surrounding its publication.

The attorney who got an attorney argued - no reasonable person would conclude that the statements were truly statements of fact .


https://www.washingtonpost.com/opini...258_story.html


The very fake false right wing media that touted her claims, so far hasn't said a peep about her defense. Please think that over.

Sidney Powell defends election fraud claims, says they were political 'hyperbole--but what about all the voters that believed her?

her speech was political in nature and protected by the First Amendment.

In a 90-page filing, she said she was advocating for former President Donald Trump as a lawyer and that political speech can be “inherently prone to exaggeration and hyperbole.

“Reasonable people would not accept such statements as fact but view them only as claims that await testing by the courts through the adversary process,” her court filing read.


And who was the attorney before that? Rudy G baby.


NEWSMAX became the go to station- but the dude who runs it C Ruddy stated- Newsmax CEO SaysThey Have No Evidence of Election Fraud. But what about those who tuned in for months and were told there was? Until Dominion said they were ready to take it to court, so all Newsmax has to do is walk it back? and their audience won't hold them accountable, why?


Diamond and Silk aka Lynette Hardaway and Rochelle Richardson, claim the "China Virus" and the "scandemic" are linked to an overall plan for the Democrats to rig the election---those who followed them believed them, until FOX cut them loose. So where they telling lies?

recap-
1. Diamond & Silk, fraudulent-let go from FOX.
2. Attorney Sidny Powell, Claimed no reasonable person would have taken her seriously.
3. NEWSMAX- walked back claims- "We have gone out of our way to say we have no evidence that the Dominion software was manipulated in any way,"
4. OAN & NEWSMAX -claimed FOX is complicit in fake news, so is that the truth?
5. Attonery General Barr stated- DOJ Has No Evidence of Fraud That Would Change Election Outcome
6. Proud Boy leader Enrico Terrio- He never thought the election was rigged. is he right? If so, where did he get his news from?


A montage goulage of OAN & Newsmax checkin' the hell out of FOX & telling their viewers Donaldict Drumpf would win in court. He went 1-60. Reggie Strickland numbers!



50 seconds in, some chick states: "We at One American News Are the only ones providing truthful, accurate numbers"


And so what does Don do? 2016 he boycotted Fox. they bowed to him. Then he left them for OAN & Newsmax- until Newsmax retracted their voter fraud claims and now he is starting his own

so does this mean ALL of right wing media is fake, false?


OAN is so into punking the fecal matter out of FOX, they advertise themselves in a manner of such-

"FOX has joined the mainstream media in censoring factual reporting" Tjis is OAN talking, not mainstream aka liberal, so one can ask is it true?

[SlimTrae]

When FOX cut off Kayleigh McEnany over election fraud claims--the viewers got pissed.



When Barr said it- they got pissed.

When Newsmax backed away- they flocked to OAN

When OAN prophecied wrong as hell, now it is time for him to launch his own...so what is he saying with these actions?


All media is fake, false and non democratic?

[SlimTrae]

Not only has right wing media been just as fake as mainstream, but unlike mainstream media- they even promoted Donald as a man for the christians- which brought about something NEVER SEEN IN AMERICA- THE RISE OF PROPHETS.'


BUT THEY SPECIALIZED IN ONE TYPE OF PROPHECIES- PROPHECYING HOW GOD WOULD USE DONALD TO MAGA.


Their congregations swelled..and the tithes aka moolah, money cash...flowed- well fake is fake be it news or talking God loves Donald so much, they prophecied he'd win easily. So, is it fake or did God lie?

[SlimTrae]

Again to cap it off, when placed in a position of a lawsuit the kraken chick testified 'No Reasonable Person' Believes 'Kraken' Conspiracies






Donald Trump's supporters Alleged Voter Fraud In Public. In Court, his team stated: They Say No Such Thing not just sidney powell, I wonder how many Trump supporters ever read their testimony.
https://time.com/5914377/donald-trum...vidence-fraud/

bound by professional ethics rules—in election-related cases in court. In three separate lawsuits in Pennsylvania and cases in Arizona and Nevada, Trump’s lawyers have jettisoned sweeping claims of fraud, instead focusing on relatively small-bore complaints.

1. But under questioning from the judge, “This is not a fraud case,” Giuliani later admitted.
2. In the same case, Trump lawyer Linda Kearns said explicitly that she is “not proceeding” on allegations of fraud.
3. lawyer Jonathan S. Goldstein stated: “Your honor, accusing people of fraud is a pretty big step,And it is rare that I call somebody a liar, and I am not calling the Board of the [Democratic National Committee] or anybody else involved in this a liar. Everybody is coming to this with good faith.”

The judge pressed Goldstein to answer the specific question: “Are you claiming that there is any fraud in connection with these 592 disputed ballots?” To which Goldstein replied: “To my knowledge at present, no.”

4. In yet another state case in Bucks County, Pa., Trump’s attorneys signed a joint stipulation of facts that explicitly admits that they are not alleging fraud,

So if they claimed no fraud, then where did all these allegations come from? Right wing media.
That's where.

[Kirkland Laing]

https://twitter.com/davidfrum/status...26463911067648

Scroll down for the second twitter message.

[zoley]

THE FACTS WON'T STOP!!

Those who claim Stolen Election have watched their sources- one by one denounce their own sources!

1. A lot of Republican voters believe this election was rigged.

Now, how did they come to this conclusion? Wasn't CNN, MSNBC, ABC,NBC. It came about from people like attorney Sidney Powell. she claimed fraud.
Question who reported it? Who entertained it? FOX, OAN, Right Wing radio to name a few.

And what did Trump team do to solidify their faith in her? Trump legal team let her go.

When it came time to prove her point-

This was in Powell’s motion for dismissaletermining whether a statement is protected involves a two-step inquiry: Is the statement one which can be proved true or false? And would reasonable people conclude that the statement is one of fact, in light of its phrasing, context, and the circumstances surrounding its publication.

The attorney who got an attorney argued - no reasonable person would conclude that the statements were truly statements of fact .


https://www.washingtonpost.com/opini...258_story.html


The very fake false right wing media that touted her claims, so far hasn't said a peep about her defense. Please think that over.

Sidney Powell defends election fraud claims, says they were political 'hyperbole--but what about all the voters that believed her?

her speech was political in nature and protected by the First Amendment.

In a 90-page filing, she said she was advocating for former President Donald Trump as a lawyer and that political speech can be “inherently prone to exaggeration and hyperbole.

“Reasonable people would not accept such statements as fact but view them only as claims that await testing by the courts through the adversary process,” her court filing read.


And who was the attorney before that? Rudy G baby.


NEWSMAX became the go to station- but the dude who runs it C Ruddy stated- Newsmax CEO SaysThey Have No Evidence of Election Fraud. But what about those who tuned in for months and were told there was? Until Dominion said they were ready to take it to court, so all Newsmax has to do is walk it back? and their audience won't hold them accountable, why?


Diamond and Silk aka Lynette Hardaway and Rochelle Richardson, claim the "China Virus" and the "scandemic" are linked to an overall plan for the Democrats to rig the election---those who followed them believed them, until FOX cut them loose. So where they telling lies?

recap-
1. Diamond & Silk, fraudulent-let go from FOX.
2. Attorney Sidny Powell, Claimed no reasonable person would have taken her seriously.
3. NEWSMAX- walked back claims- "We have gone out of our way to say we have no evidence that the Dominion software was manipulated in any way,"
4. OAN & NEWSMAX -claimed FOX is complicit in fake news, so is that the truth?
5. Attonery General Barr stated- DOJ Has No Evidence of Fraud That Would Change Election Outcome
6. Proud Boy leader Enrico Terrio- He never thought the election was rigged. is he right? If so, where did he get his news from?


A montage goulage of OAN & Newsmax checkin' the hell out of FOX & telling their viewers Donaldict Drumpf would win in court. He went 1-60. Reggie Strickland numbers!



50 seconds in, some chick states: "We at One American News Are the only ones providing truthful, accurate numbers"


And so what does Don do? 2016 he boycotted Fox. they bowed to him. Then he left them for OAN & Newsmax- until Newsmax retracted their voter fraud claims and now he is starting his own

so does this mean ALL of right wing media is fake, false?


OAN is so into punking the fecal matter out of FOX, they advertise themselves in a manner of such-

"FOX has joined the mainstream media in censoring factual reporting" Tjis is OAN talking, not mainstream aka liberal, so one can ask is it true?

thing is, yall got nothin to fake here, it be right in ya faces but nahhh,

[Kirkland Laing]

https://twitter.com/GOP/status/1329490975266398210

[SlimTrae]

THE FACTS WON'T STOP!!

Those who claim Stolen Election have watched their sources- one by one denounce their own sources!

1. A lot of Republican voters believe this election was rigged.

Now, how did they come to this conclusion? Wasn't CNN, MSNBC, ABC,NBC. It came about from people like attorney Sidney Powell. she claimed fraud.
Question who reported it? Who entertained it? FOX, OAN, Right Wing radio to name a few.

And what did Trump team do to solidify their faith in her? Trump legal team let her go.

When it came time to prove her point-

This was in Powell’s motion for dismissaletermining whether a statement is protected involves a two-step inquiry: Is the statement one which can be proved true or false? And would reasonable people conclude that the statement is one of fact, in light of its phrasing, context, and the circumstances surrounding its publication.

The attorney who got an attorney argued - no reasonable person would conclude that the statements were truly statements of fact .


https://www.washingtonpost.com/opini...258_story.html


The very fake false right wing media that touted her claims, so far hasn't said a peep about her defense. Please think that over.

Sidney Powell defends election fraud claims, says they were political 'hyperbole--but what about all the voters that believed her?

her speech was political in nature and protected by the First Amendment.

In a 90-page filing, she said she was advocating for former President Donald Trump as a lawyer and that political speech can be “inherently prone to exaggeration and hyperbole.

“Reasonable people would not accept such statements as fact but view them only as claims that await testing by the courts through the adversary process,” her court filing read.


And who was the attorney before that? Rudy G baby.


NEWSMAX became the go to station- but the dude who runs it C Ruddy stated- Newsmax CEO SaysThey Have No Evidence of Election Fraud. But what about those who tuned in for months and were told there was? Until Dominion said they were ready to take it to court, so all Newsmax has to do is walk it back? and their audience won't hold them accountable, why?


Diamond and Silk aka Lynette Hardaway and Rochelle Richardson, claim the "China Virus" and the "scandemic" are linked to an overall plan for the Democrats to rig the election---those who followed them believed them, until FOX cut them loose. So where they telling lies?

recap-
1. Diamond & Silk, fraudulent-let go from FOX.
2. Attorney Sidny Powell, Claimed no reasonable person would have taken her seriously.
3. NEWSMAX- walked back claims- "We have gone out of our way to say we have no evidence that the Dominion software was manipulated in any way,"
4. OAN & NEWSMAX -claimed FOX is complicit in fake news, so is that the truth?
5. Attonery General Barr stated- DOJ Has No Evidence of Fraud That Would Change Election Outcome
6. Proud Boy leader Enrico Terrio- He never thought the election was rigged. is he right? If so, where did he get his news from?


A montage goulage of OAN & Newsmax checkin' the hell out of FOX & telling their viewers Donaldict Drumpf would win in court. He went 1-60. Reggie Strickland numbers!



50 seconds in, some chick states: "We at One American News Are the only ones providing truthful, accurate numbers"


And so what does Don do? 2016 he boycotted Fox. they bowed to him. Then he left them for OAN & Newsmax- until Newsmax retracted their voter fraud claims and now he is starting his own

so does this mean ALL of right wing media is fake, false?


OAN is so into punking the fecal matter out of FOX, they advertise themselves in a manner of such-

"FOX has joined the mainstream media in censoring factual reporting" Tjis is OAN talking, not mainstream aka liberal, so one can ask is it true?

thing is, yall got nothin to fake here, it be right in ya faces but nahhh,

Ya'll? No one here supports him, at least myself, I didnt vote for him and not sure who has. I could see placing this in the Biden thread- we all Bash him there.
I just wanted to make a thread on rignt wing media. I'm of the mindset all media is biased, not just Mainstream.

[SlimTrae]

Any Parler fans here?

I heard they were the anecdote to left wingism. When I heard of zuckerfuck, zuckerburg working with FBI wasn't sure if he was trying to do the right thing or trying to supress speech he didnt want- after all it is his shit, he aint got to accept all.


I understood both sides. But since millions turned to Parler- I wondered why the silence on these guys- only to learn right before the D-day aka Donald's Day aka Jan 6th.


The Wall Street Journal detailed how Parler made more than 50 referrals to the FBI ahead of the violent siege.


One user wrote: "To confirm, you are calling for an investigation into big tech collusion while you are colluding with the FBI against your platform members?"

Another user wrote: "This is NOT an example of a free speech platform. Parler is a fraud."


Question- when is free speech not free speech?

If someone posts your address on lets say Muhfreedom.abc & told users to go by and douse your house with buckets of camel snot. And someone told the cops- next day they got 4 guys front page with 18 bucket loads...plot stopped.
would you be angry at muhfreedom.abc for preventing it?

Serious would you?

WTF was Parler supposed to do? If they got folks planning out in the open- what they were going to do Jan 6th naming their organizations. at what point do you as the owner of a social platform either intervene or close their account out...knowing if you do-- the following will occur:


"I guess when a company says they are a free speech platform I would not expect them to turn folks over to the corrupt FBI," one person commented.

Another wrote:
"How is this supposed to make us want to stay on Parler when you violated people's right to free speech?"

A third Parler user said: "So you are saying you ratted on a bunch of us."


Can we conclude these members were not BLM? I mean why would Parler protect leftists free speech? Especially if the speech involved premeditated actions.


I can't say Parler is a fake platform. I can't or won't say they denied free speech.

think I can say they denied individuals the right to congregate on their site planning acts that they assumed was meant to cause damage in any nature- be it dousing someone's home with toilet paper or ruining the State Capital.

[SlimTrae]

And the wildest part is those who want to leave Parler invoke his name- The Don, they can't wait for --
https://www.45office.com/root


Well it's here!
Is this the answer to fake news, biased social platforms?

His home page I mean is spectacular!!

BE BEST, Mrs. Trump’s awareness campaign

BE BEST also held a role on the international stage.
In addition to BE BEST, Mrs. Trump has a deep appreciation for

There is a page for receiving a greeting from either one- but allow up to 6 weeks for processing to get that greeting- I mean just because its a website doesnt mean its reel-time I mean they got shit to do.
Due to the volume of greeting requests President and Mrs. Trump receive, we will not provide status updates. (wow only a few days and they're stacked already)


Now I admit the greeting page is special- they claim they will respond to events of the people- just use the dropdown menu if the media will attend.

& the final page is for Press Inquiry- the page states they dig hearing from the people. Not sure what that has to do with the media& don't expect status updates.

So for the people who left Parler stating they can't wait for Don's Page..well its here!!

I do wonder if/when they will add a forum to discuss or a page to allow the good citizens to plan their next kickaDemocratintheazzapalooza event.

I mean we got Biden, Harris & pelosi's pussy is still stanking the halls the hell up. surely there must be a website where we all in public can plan on diapering their houses, tampon their cars, kotex their mopads, threaten a V.P. Isn't that what free speech is for?



https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/techn...ot/ar-BB1f0ory