Who’s had the vaccine ? Side effects ?

[TIC]

Yeah, it definitely hasn't enjoyed being isolated. It's behaviour has changed markedly, it seems to be scratching its fur a lot and is noticeably unhappy.

I would triumphantly conclude that, having provably isolated the virus now, I need to show how you can catch it from a surface or through the air.

I tried shoving the virus up my nose but it wouldn't quite fit in my nostril. I think TIC might have been onto something all along now as I can't see how you could physically catch the virus from inhaling it - which means that all those anti-maskers might be right after all.

Of course, having the virus stuck in your nose might technically count as 'catching it' and thus actually being infected? That is clearly why infected people are immune (obviously having a virus blocking each nostril means that nothing else can get in, so you are immune)

In a startling new development ..... I have also established the cause of so-called 'long covid' too.

As part of my experiment to see if one could catch my newly isolated virus from a surface, I also licked it up and swallowed it yesterday. This morning, I have discovered that the virus is now lodged and is blocking my anus so I can't have a poo.

Logically, I will not now be able to expel that virus from my body for some time now ............ so I have long Covid.

I will keep you all informed of my continuing ground breaking research in due course!

you haven't outlined your processes describing the isolation of the covid nineteen aka sars cov two virus in human beings, directly from a sample taken from a patient, where the patient sample was not first combined with any other source of genetic material. note the word isolate indicates a thing is separated from all other material surrounding it. you are an example for titofan of one party not acting in good faith

That's a bit unfair, mate. You didn't ask for all that stuff, you just wanted proof that the virus had been isolated by me and that I could show how it could be passed on from surfaces or the air.

You can see that I have gone to a whole load of effort to do that, post the photos and explain my findings from my experiments.

Surely it's cheating a bit to now say all this stuff after the event? That's an example of somebody not acting in good faith, not me.

You've hurt my feelings a bit, to be honest.

Anyway, I will persevere in good faith.

My neighbour has COVID (and I know this because he took a government test. Our government over here never lies about anything so it was definitely a COVID positive sample.).

I got him to spit into a teacup and kept his spit isolated from anything else (for example, I was very careful not to make a cup of tea in that cup)

I made absolutely certain that I didn't inadvertently contaminate the sample (say, by masturbating into it) either, so I am sure that it is pure genetic material from the patient and not combined with any other genetic material. Like spunk.

I found a large kitchen sieve and, wearing my gardening gloves and a welding mask, I very carefully passed the material through the sieve. The virus remained in the sieve and I separated this out. I remembered the sage advice from president Trump and put the virus into a shoebox (because it is dark in there) and kept the shoebox well away from bleach.

That's how I did it, and hopefully you can see that it was done scientifically, and that it provides you with the reassurance you need.

So you can see that I have acted in good faith and gone to a great deal of time and trouble to follow your guidelines and requirements for a proper and complete scientific experiment that I think proves the things you were asking for. Does that help mate?

spit would contain other material. how are you seeing the virus you claim you separated again? your camera must be amazing. you should quit while you are ahead

I’ve already shown it to you, pay attention man. I put a photo up of it.

Plus there was no spit after I isolated the virus by using the sieve. I’m beginning to doubt whether you even read these responses, or if your scientific credentials are not what you imply they are. Are you able to post a copy of them by any chance?

you are claiming to have isolated a virus with a sift & taken a photo of it with your camera & you are talking to me about credentials. you really are a funny guy

Well, I have taken a lot of time and trouble to isolate the virus and to prove it can be caught through the air and off surfaces. You must agree with that surely? I’ve pretty much nailed it

I have been open and transparent about my scientific methodology and the specialist apparatus I used throughout the experiment. Yes, I used my camera to record the virus, but don't forget it was pretty much zoomed in to the max. It is a very good phone

I got decent results in my Science GCSE exams, and I am a registered Fire Marshall at work so I think I am qualified to carry out this experiment and also that my scientifically proven results should be accepted. You can't seriously have spent 42 pages asking somebody to do this and then start quibbling about small details when they do, or what was the point of asking it so many times?

That would be really mean after all my hard work. My wife is pissed off because I used the sieve already so don't make it all futile

I was genuinely asking about your credentials though, just so I can be assured that you are properly qualified to peer-review my work, and arent just some random internet guy making nonsensical arguments, bringing in more blockers and caveats after the event, and then refusing to accept facts when they are presented to them.

Obviously, I dont think you are that, but (speaking as one scientist to another) you will admit that the logical possibility does exist, no matter how far fetched that might be?

saying it's a very good phone is all i need to ignore your bullshit. i could pick you to bits but it would be a waste of my time. it is strange though that all those here that hold the same belief as you are not calling out your bullshit