Thread: CHUCK GIAMPA OFFICIALY BLACKLISTED???

Originally Posted by SalTheButcher

I saw the fight and there was no way in hell it was 116 for Floyd.

i agree sally...........116 for floyd pleaze......at least the 3rd judge saw the same fight i did

i actually once had a poll to blacklisyt giampa for a previous foight, i am troo fdrunk to mremembr which one, it h think it was taylor writghy and people voted no, but this on top of that...


loks like he will be added


and the motherfucking proiducers of rocky 6 made him be the only guy that gave the fight to rocky, that pissed me off

I had Floyd about 2 points ahead, i had £25 on Oscar to win a decision but there was no way he won that fight

This was a hard fight to score with some close rounds i had it 117 Mayweather 113 Oscar so a 4 point difference but it was hard to call but i thought Mayweather deserved a UD

It was a S***** Fight........

Let's be real here...it is not even as though it was a fight with a lack of action but was technical so it can be appreciated in that aspect......DLH looked for one big shot....Floyd looked just to survive....

Floyd SR nailed the scoring on the head....Oscar was the agressor and Floyd was the more accurated....Oscar threw more...Floyd landed more.......

It is all how you judge it....agressiveness or accuracy....We have all seen guys who land less win fights on the merit they were the agressor....so the scoring was not actualy bad....

reminded me of Sven Ottke .

Originally Posted by DaxxKahn

It was a S***** Fight........

Let's be real here...it is not even as though it was a fight with a lack of action but was technical so it can be appreciated in that aspect......DLH looked for one big shot....Floyd looked just to survive....

Floyd SR nailed the scoring on the head....Oscar was the agressor and Floyd was the more accurated....Oscar threw more...Floyd landed more.......

It is all how you judge it....agressiveness or accuracy....We have all seen guys who land less win fights on the merit they were the agressor....so the scoring was not actualy bad....

Agree with the last part, but therein lies the problem. There is no one set way of criteria to judge a fight. Some judge based on accuracy, others on who was more aggressive. If two of the three would have been the type who appreciate who presses the action, Oscar would have won. But that's not how it was.

His was the only score that wasn't absolutely shameful. That fight was an easy 117-111 for Floyd. I don't know how you could possibly give Oscar more than 4 rounds.

For gods sake... The guy who gave it 115-113 for Oscar is the suspect party here.. 116-112 was a perfectly acceptable score if you ask me... It seems most people think 115-113 for Floyd was dead on.. And yet everyone admits there were severel very close rounds.. So this judge who gave on more swing round to Floyd should be blacklisted Right. Sal, GET OFF THE GLUE.

Originally Posted by DaxxKahn

It was a S***** Fight........

Let's be real here...it is not even as though it was a fight with a lack of action but was technical so it can be appreciated in that aspect......DLH looked for one big shot....Floyd looked just to survive....

Floyd SR nailed the scoring on the head....Oscar was the agressor and Floyd was the more accurated....Oscar threw more...Floyd landed more.......

It is all how you judge it....agressiveness or accuracy....We have all seen guys who land less win fights on the merit they were the agressor....so the scoring was not actualy bad....

I think you guys get carried away a bit. The judges score the fight round by round so the difference between 116-112 and 115-113 is merely one single close round where one judge thought it went one way and another thought it went another.

There were several close rounds in that fight.

In the end I feel the right man won because Floyd finished like a true champion should, on top. Oscar finished like a great fighter who always loses to the elite is expected to finish, fading down the stretch.

Originally Posted by DaxxKahn

It was a S***** Fight........

Let's be real here...it is not even as though it was a fight with a lack of action but was technical so it can be appreciated in that aspect......DLH looked for one big shot....Floyd looked just to survive....

Floyd SR nailed the scoring on the head....Oscar was the agressor and Floyd was the more accurated....Oscar threw more...Floyd landed more.......

It is all how you judge it....agressiveness or accuracy....We have all seen guys who land less win fights on the merit they were the agressor....so the scoring was not actualy bad....

That's fair in some fights, but the numbers weren't even close here. Floyd landed at more than DOUBLE the connect-percentage of Oscar, and landed nearly TWICE as many shots. Tom Kaszmarik is going to feel like an ass when he watches the tape.