Boxing Forums



User Tag List

Thanks Thanks:  0
Likes Likes:  0
Dislikes Dislikes:  0
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 23

Thread: New Raitings On Box Rec

Share/Bookmark
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Posts
    7,899
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    0
    Cool Clicks

    Default New Raitings On Box Rec

    Looked like some folks helped themselve quite a bit last night,and a current champ shot himself in the foot with that lack luster performance according to them
    http://www.boxrec.com/ratings.php?na...us=A&SUBMIT=Go

  2. #2
    ICB Guest

    Default Re: New Raitings On Box Rec

    Mora at number 10 what a joke.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    South Carolina, United States
    Posts
    24,706
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1550
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: New Raitings On Box Rec

    Quote Originally Posted by Trainer Monkey
    Looked like some folks helped themselve quite a bit last night,and a current champ shot himself in the foot with that lack luster performance according to them
    http://www.boxrec.com/ratings.php?na...us=A&SUBMIT=Go
    If anyone shot themselves in the foot & further besmirched their credibility...it's boxrec.com.

    They listed Spinks in their top 10 middles...what the fwock?
    Never beg a 40 dollar hooker...specially after she's just turned down your mom's credit card!!

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    South Carolina, United States
    Posts
    24,706
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1550
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: New Raitings On Box Rec

    Quote Originally Posted by ICE COLD BOXING
    Mora at number 10 what a joke.
    I actually have no issues with that...but Spinks at number three?!?!?! Over Pavlik?

    Come the fuck on!
    Never beg a 40 dollar hooker...specially after she's just turned down your mom's credit card!!

  5. #5
    ICB Guest

    Default Re: New Raitings On Box Rec

    Quote Originally Posted by wacko3205
    Quote Originally Posted by ICE COLD BOXING
    Mora at number 10 what a joke.
    I actually have no issues with that...but Spinks at number three?!?!?! Over Pavlik?

    Come the F*** on!
    Yea even though he gave good showing fact of matter is don't matter how many people say Spinks won at end of the day Taylor got the decision Spinks lost and a good showing should not automatically place you that high imo but i disagree with Mora he should be about 20.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Posts
    3,385
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    0
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: New Raitings On Box Rec

    Quote Originally Posted by wacko3205
    Quote Originally Posted by ICE COLD BOXING
    Mora at number 10 what a joke.
    I actually have no issues with that...but Spinks at number three?!?!?! Over Pavlik?

    Come the F*** on!
    come on wack the man best competition was 5 rounders (at a point which recordwise indicates he should've been fighting atleast against guys that will get title shots but not win them. He steals rounds by throwing weak combos at the end of them and if he gets in the ring with a legit fighter (power puncher or not) he will get destroyed.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Posts
    7,899
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    0
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: New Raitings On Box Rec

    And for the record,I dont writes em,I just reports em

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    South Carolina, United States
    Posts
    24,706
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1550
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: New Raitings On Box Rec

    Quote Originally Posted by Punisher136
    Quote Originally Posted by wacko3205
    Quote Originally Posted by ICE COLD BOXING
    Mora at number 10 what a joke.
    I actually have no issues with that...but Spinks at number three?!?!?! Over Pavlik?

    Come the F*** on!
    come on wack the man best competition was 5 rounders (at a point which recordwise indicates he should've been fighting atleast against guys that will get title shots but not win them. He steals rounds by throwing weak combos at the end of them and if he gets in the ring with a legit fighter (power puncher or not) he will get destroyed.
    That's your opinion and you're entitled to be wrong...but he's undefeated & keeps on winning...also...I never said that I liked him or that I think he's some kinda world beater...I just stated...clearly...that I have no issues with his placing in comparsion to Spinks though...it's laughable.

    Pavlik should be resting in Spinks slot quite comfortabley.
    Never beg a 40 dollar hooker...specially after she's just turned down your mom's credit card!!

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Posts
    3,385
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    0
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: New Raitings On Box Rec

    The heavyweight ratings have Sprott in the top 20 at first i thought that was a joke but after reveiwing the division for a second, i can't say that i completely disagree with that. I mean he has fought the best out there and beaten some of them.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Posts
    3,385
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    0
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: New Raitings On Box Rec

    Quote Originally Posted by wacko3205
    Quote Originally Posted by Punisher136
    Quote Originally Posted by wacko3205
    Quote Originally Posted by ICE COLD BOXING
    Mora at number 10 what a joke.
    I actually have no issues with that...but Spinks at number three?!?!?! Over Pavlik?

    Come the F*** on!
    come on wack the man best competition was 5 rounders (at a point which recordwise indicates he should've been fighting atleast against guys that will get title shots but not win them. He steals rounds by throwing weak combos at the end of them and if he gets in the ring with a legit fighter (power puncher or not) he will get destroyed.
    That's your opinion and you're entitled to be wrong...but he's undefeated & keeps on winning...also...I never said that I liked him or that I think he's some kinda world beater...I just stated...clearly...that I have no issues with his placing in comparsion to Spinks though...it's laughable.

    Pavlik should be resting in Spinks slot quite comfortabley.
    I do suppose staying undefeated against weak competition is better than have a loss to it. Fair enough

  11. #11
    ICB Guest

    Default Re: New Raitings On Box Rec

    Quote Originally Posted by wacko3205
    Quote Originally Posted by Punisher136
    Quote Originally Posted by wacko3205
    Quote Originally Posted by ICE COLD BOXING
    Mora at number 10 what a joke.
    I actually have no issues with that...but Spinks at number three?!?!?! Over Pavlik?

    Come the F*** on!
    come on wack the man best competition was 5 rounders (at a point which recordwise indicates he should've been fighting atleast against guys that will get title shots but not win them. He steals rounds by throwing weak combos at the end of them and if he gets in the ring with a legit fighter (power puncher or not) he will get destroyed.
    That's your opinion and you're entitled to be wrong...but he's undefeated & keeps on winning...also...I never said that I liked him or that I think he's some kinda world beater...I just stated...clearly...that I have no issues with his placing in comparsion to Spinks though...it's laughable.

    Pavlik should be resting in Spinks slot quite comfortabley.
    He is undefeated yes but who has he beat in his last 2 fights ?? he got dropped by mediocre fighter then beats guy with 25-3 i think it was and that places Mora top 10 Middleweight ?? i don't think so Wacko.

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Posts
    3,385
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    0
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: New Raitings On Box Rec

    They're formula is messed up. It was made to predict who would win a fight and placing better fighters above the ones they'd supposedly beat. This formula has been changed several times in the last years because of situations like this. The last time it had to be changed because after alonzo butler beat a guy by some freakishly wide margin they shot him up to the top 8. They have it based on actual judges scores so the more points a judge gave a guy the more it effects his rating. The SD shot spinks up because essentially they're giving him credit with half beating Taylor.

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Posts
    563
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    0
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: New Raitings On Box Rec

    I don't get the point of boxrec's ratings one bit.
    I mean, I understand their system, but I don't know what they're trying to prove wth it.
    Boxing is maybe the most subjective sport in the world. Calculators can't determine boxing rankings.

    Well, it's good for a laugh anyways.

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    South Carolina, United States
    Posts
    24,706
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1550
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: New Raitings On Box Rec

    Quote Originally Posted by ICE COLD BOXING
    He is undefeated yes but who has he beat in his last 2 fights ?? he got dropped by mediocre fighter then beats guy with 25-3 i think it was and that places Mora top 10 Middleweight ?? i don't think so Wacko.
    ICB...how would you rank a fighter when compiling a list?

    Not quite sure how...but generally you line up the combatants that are most active & then you rank them on their records, opposition, & last completed bouts.

    I never said that I agreed with the place that they have the man...nor did I say that I liked him...but it is laughable that Spinks is in the number three spot & Mora is trailing behind him.

    For some reason...many people love LOVE LOVE to read more into what is posted than by what is actually said.

    Mora's undefeated & has performed quite imperssively during his outtings. As for what happened regarding him being dropped...he got up to win...correct?

    Odd that many boxing fans will applaude other fighters that they favor for getting up & gutting out a win when it suits their fancy.

    Like Mora or not...& I fwockin don't...he did get up to win...& deserves the credit.
    Never beg a 40 dollar hooker...specially after she's just turned down your mom's credit card!!

  15. #15
    ICB Guest

    Default Re: New Raitings On Box Rec

    Quote Originally Posted by wacko3205
    Quote Originally Posted by ICE COLD BOXING
    He is undefeated yes but who has he beat in his last 2 fights ?? he got dropped by mediocre fighter then beats guy with 25-3 i think it was and that places Mora top 10 Middleweight ?? i don't think so Wacko.
    ICB...how would you rank a fighter when compiling a list?

    Not quite sure how...but generally you line up the combatants that are most active & then you rank them on their records, opposition, & last completed bouts.

    I never said that I agreed with the place that they have the man...nor did I say that I liked him...but it is laughable that Spinks is in the number three spot & Mora is trailing behind him.

    For some reason...many people love LOVE LOVE to read more into what is posted than by what is actually said.

    Mora's undefeated & has performed quite imperssively during his outtings. As for what happened regarding him being dropped...he got up to win...correct?

    Odd that many boxing fans will applaude other fighters that they favor for getting up & gutting out a win when it suits their fancy.

    Like Mora or not...& I fwockin don't...he did get up to win...& deserves the credit.
    I don't think Spinks should be 3 i agreed with you on that but Mora at number 10 ?? he hasn't fought since August yes he got up and won from being kd but still not impressive to be dropped by a nobody and since that has fought a guy with 25-3 he is nowhere near top 10 imo.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

     

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  




Boxing | Boxing Photos | Boxing News | Boxing Forum | Boxing Rankings

Copyright © 2000 - 2024 Saddo Boxing - Boxing