Boxing Forums



User Tag List

Thanks Thanks:  0
Likes Likes:  0
Dislikes Dislikes:  0
Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast
Results 16 to 30 of 32

Thread: Is Hatton better than Castillo was at Lightweight

Share/Bookmark
  1. #16
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Posts
    43
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    0
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Is Hatton better than Castillo was at Lightweight

    Hatton may not of broken his ribs but he certainly broke his heart. Castillo was always a little one dimensional and was ideal stylistically for Hatton to shine against. For my money Hatton beats any incarnation of Castillo and pound for pound he's the more rounded fighter with greater career achievements.

  2. #17
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Posts
    6,229
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    2476
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Is Hatton better than Castillo was at Lightweight

    Quote Originally Posted by Violent Demise
    Quote Originally Posted by Kel
    Quote Originally Posted by Violent Demise
    Quote Originally Posted by Kel
    Quote Originally Posted by ElTerribleMorales
    yea he has a KO4 over a shot aged and worn Castillo, Mayweather will always have 2 UDS against a prime Castillo which at least one of was more impressive than Hattons victory
    So a prime Castillo would have shrugged off that body punch and the broken ribs would not have bothered him?
    Castillo ribs were never broken. It was just something made up by a Hatton groupie
    I read that in a few articles after Ricky said it on TV might be false. Anyway here is a quote from Castillo himself about the body shot.
    "He got me very good with that punch," said Castillo afterwards. "I have never been caught that way. It was the perfect shot. I couldn't breathe. I couldn't get up."

    http://www.cnpprofessional.co.uk/blo...-blog-237.html
    Thats one about the ribs

    Castillo gave a short interview on Telefutro (Spanish TV) a couple of weeks after the Hatton fight saying he was okay and was undecided about his future. He said he was sore but was other wise fine. If Castillo's ribs were really broken it would of been heard about every where
    Well if his ribs were broke he would be sore.......but fine otherwise .
    Who knows if they were broke? maybe your right we would know more about it if so.
    You only have to look at the shot to figure out why he could not get to his feet. I reckon that body shot would have dropped a LOT of guys.

  3. #18
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Posts
    399
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    987
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Is Hatton better than Castillo was at Lightweight

    A prime Castillo could have taken that shot. He looked quite fleshy in the Hatton fight and he was moving up away from his best division. He had weight trouble in the last two Corrales fights and he wasn't himself in the fight before Hatton. If we had a prime v prime fight i think it would be a real brutal affair and i have to say it would be a coin toss as to whom would come out victorious. 100% it would go longer than 4 rounds tho.

  4. #19
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    kentucky
    Posts
    4,334
    Mentioned
    10 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1120
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Is Hatton better than Castillo was at Lightweight

    certain body shots like the one hatton happened to land on castillo will take out most any fighter, doesn't matter if they're in their absolute prime or past their best.

  5. #20
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Posts
    6,229
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    2476
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Is Hatton better than Castillo was at Lightweight

    Quote Originally Posted by ACEA
    A prime Castillo could have taken that shot. He looked quite fleshy in the Hatton fight and he was moving up away from his best division. He had weight trouble in the last two Corrales fights and he wasn't himself in the fight before Hatton. If we had a prime v prime fight i think it would be a real brutal affair and i have to say it would be a coin toss as to whom would come out victorious. 100% it would go longer than 4 rounds tho.
    Impossible to say mate. I can't recall a fight where he took a shot as good as that.

  6. #21
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Los Angeles
    Posts
    18,672
    Mentioned
    40 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    0
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Is Hatton better than Castillo was at Lightweight

    Quote Originally Posted by Kel
    Quote Originally Posted by ACEA
    A prime Castillo could have taken that shot. He looked quite fleshy in the Hatton fight and he was moving up away from his best division. He had weight trouble in the last two Corrales fights and he wasn't himself in the fight before Hatton. If we had a prime v prime fight i think it would be a real brutal affair and i have to say it would be a coin toss as to whom would come out victorious. 100% it would go longer than 4 rounds tho.
    Impossible to say mate. I can't recall a fight where he took a shot as good as that.
    You must of not seen Castillo-Corrales 1. He took some brutal shots. Including some to the body

  7. #22
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Posts
    6,229
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    2476
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Is Hatton better than Castillo was at Lightweight

    Quote Originally Posted by Violent Demise
    Quote Originally Posted by Kel
    Quote Originally Posted by ACEA
    A prime Castillo could have taken that shot. He looked quite fleshy in the Hatton fight and he was moving up away from his best division. He had weight trouble in the last two Corrales fights and he wasn't himself in the fight before Hatton. If we had a prime v prime fight i think it would be a real brutal affair and i have to say it would be a coin toss as to whom would come out victorious. 100% it would go longer than 4 rounds tho.
    Impossible to say mate. I can't recall a fight where he took a shot as good as that.
    You must of not seen Castillo-Corrales 1. He took some brutal shots. Including some to the body
    Seen it lots of times and no BODY SHOTS he took compares.

  8. #23
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Posts
    399
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    987
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Is Hatton better than Castillo was at Lightweight

    sorry i wasn't very clear, it was a good body shot but how of it was down to the conditioning of Castillo? If he would have been riped and in peak physical condition would he have gone down? Sure it would have hurt him but would it have KOed him?

  9. #24
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Posts
    6,229
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    2476
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Is Hatton better than Castillo was at Lightweight

    Quote Originally Posted by ACEA
    sorry i wasn't very clear, it was a good body shot but how of it was down to the conditioning of Castillo? If he would have been riped and in peak physical condition would he have gone down? Sure it would have hurt him but would it have KOed him?
    You dont have any muscle covering the area he got hit in. Feel about 3 inches below your armpit.

  10. #25
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    a local pub near you.
    Posts
    7,652
    Mentioned
    5 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    2779
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Is Hatton better than Castillo was at Lightweight

    Quote Originally Posted by Kel
    Quote Originally Posted by ACEA
    sorry i wasn't very clear, it was a good body shot but how of it was down to the conditioning of Castillo? If he would have been riped and in peak physical condition would he have gone down? Sure it would have hurt him but would it have KOed him?
    You dont have any muscle covering the area he got hit in. Feel about 3 inches below your armpit.
    Eric Esch does.....
    "If there's a better chin in the world than Pryor's, it has to be on Mount Rushmore." -Pat Putnam.

  11. #26
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Melbourne Australia
    Posts
    2,702
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1139
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Is Hatton better than Castillo was at Lightweight

    Quote Originally Posted by ElTerribleMorales
    yea he has a KO4 over a shot aged and worn Castillo, Mayweather will always have 2 UDS against a prime Castillo which at least one of was more impressive than Hattons victory
    I'll give you that! No doubt Castillo was great against PBF in fight 1 and the Corrales fights were incredible. Just give the Fatboy some time and he will live up to expectations.

  12. #27
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Posts
    6,229
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    2476
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Is Hatton better than Castillo was at Lightweight

    Quote Originally Posted by boozeboxer
    Quote Originally Posted by Kel
    Quote Originally Posted by ACEA
    sorry i wasn't very clear, it was a good body shot but how of it was down to the conditioning of Castillo? If he would have been riped and in peak physical condition would he have gone down? Sure it would have hurt him but would it have KOed him?
    You dont have any muscle covering the area he got hit in. Feel about 3 inches below your armpit.
    Eric Esch does.....

  13. #28
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Posts
    1,377
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    914
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Is Hatton better than Castillo was at Lightweight

    Does anyone yet see what I'm getting at with this thread.

    Most believe that Hatton will go after Floyd in a very similar fashion to the way Castillo did in their first fight. Many have said in other threads that Floyd has learned from that fight and is a better fighter.

    Here we are having a debate on whether or not Hatton is better than the lightweight version of Castillo and the debate is split down the middle.

    So my question is obvious. How will Hatton beat Floyd?

  14. #29
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Posts
    43
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    0
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Is Hatton better than Castillo was at Lightweight

    He will do what he does best and what has got him this far. Theres no deceptive stratagem in this one and what you see is what you get. The only question that is yet unanswered pertains to the horsepower that Hatton has at his disposal. Guile and ring craft is not really his forte and he doesn't possess the ability to execute pressure whilst remaining elusive unlike Duran against DeJesus in their third encounter.

  15. #30
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Posts
    1,306
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    0
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Is Hatton better than Castillo was at Lightweight

    Prime Castillo would destroy Hatton

    Quote Originally Posted by The Rookie Fan
    Does anyone yet see what I'm getting at with this thread.

    Most believe that Hatton will go after Floyd in a very similar fashion to the way Castillo did in their first fight. Many have said in other threads that Floyd has learned from that fight and is a better fighter.

    Here we are having a debate on whether or not Hatton is better than the lightweight version of Castillo and the debate is split down the middle.

    So my question is obvious. How will Hatton beat Floyd?
    He wont.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

     

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  




Boxing | Boxing Photos | Boxing News | Boxing Forum | Boxing Rankings

Copyright © 2000 - 2024 Saddo Boxing - Boxing