Boxing Forums



User Tag List

Thanks Thanks:  0
Likes Likes:  0
Dislikes Dislikes:  0
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 28

Thread: What More could Dirrell Have done

Share/Bookmark
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Posts
    2,720
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1051
    Cool Clicks

    Default What More could Dirrell Have done

    Ok the obvious answer is KO Froch but seriouly what more could the man have done.

    1.He made Froch miss and miss badly at times.
    2.Used the ring effectivley
    3.Landed the cleaner shots.
    4.Not sure of the punch stats but to me it appeared that Dirrel landed more shots.
    5. He hurt Froch.
    6. He clearly frustrated Froch. This is indicated by the body slam and rabbit punches.

    SO WHAT MORE DO PEOPLE WANT FROM DIRREl?

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Posts
    18,367
    Mentioned
    38 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    2483
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: What More could Dirrell Have done

    I thought he won clearly but are you being serious? He could have just done more. Period. He spent too much time grabbing and not enough punching. He was on the road and he had at least one judge that was bought or somehow influenced (the guy that scored the 11th for Froch, I mean come on that's just corruption, there's no other explanation) and at times he did just enough to win rounds when sometimes you have to know that you have to do more than that, don't leave any questions, don't let an incompetent judge say yeah but Froch was coming forward. It was a bit Clottey-esque.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Posts
    593
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    864
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: What More could Dirrell Have done

    i agree that any judge that scored the 11th for froch is either blind, retarded or just plain corrupt. But Dirrell has to throw and land punches to win a fight. he could have picked froch apart round after round if he chose to fight and i thought he could have ko'd froch the way he was tagging him in the 11th. Dirrell gave everyone with good eyes the impression he didn't want to fight for most of the rounds. Froch was slower than molasses but at least he looked like he wanted to fight.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Posts
    1,480
    Mentioned
    13 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1019
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: What More could Dirrell Have done

    Dirrell could have taken a more combatative approach. Not saying he had to be agressive, but he had the speed and reach to catch Front coming in. With his speed, and the fact that Froch carrying his hands low often, he could have dropped inside lead hooks all day and slip the counters with his eyes closed.
    Floyd and Pac did it to Hatton... Jones jr. did it gonzalez and countless other sluggers. Niether of them is considered the agressive brawling type. Dirrell chose to use his feet and stupid grin, more than he did his hands because he doesn't like being in range to get hit. Then again niether did Ali or Lewis, so they used their reach and footwork to keep their opponents under control in the center of the ring. Sure they clinched or moved to avoid the rush and swarm tactics, but after that it was back to business as usual. Dirrell fought like a fighter that didn't have enough pop to put his opponent away (even though he did) so he rather run his way to a stinker of a victory than putting his speed or combinations to use going for an accumulation of puches because it presented too much of a risk.
    They want your @$$ beat because upsets make news. News brings about excitement, excitement brings about ratings. The objective is to bring you up to the tower and tear your @$$ down. And if you don't believe that, you're crazy.

    Roy Jones, Jr. "What I've Learned," Esquire 2003

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    South London Baby
    Posts
    5,330
    Mentioned
    8 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1644
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: What More could Dirrell Have done

    Quote Originally Posted by OumaFan View Post
    I thought he won clearly but are you being serious? He could have just done more. Period. He spent too much time grabbing and not enough punching. He was on the road and he had at least one judge that was bought or somehow influenced (the guy that scored the 11th for Froch, I mean come on that's just corruption, there's no other explanation) and at times he did just enough to win rounds when sometimes you have to know that you have to do more than that, don't leave any questions, don't let an incompetent judge say yeah but Froch was coming forward. It was a bit Clottey-esque.
    This. I thought Dirrell won comfortably, but if he'd just put the effort he put into the last 2 1/2 rounds into the rest of the fight, no one would be able to dispute it & he might well have KO'd Froch (although I'm convinced the European judges would have still found a way to give it to Froch).

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Los Angeles
    Posts
    18,672
    Mentioned
    40 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    0
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: What More could Dirrell Have done

    It doesn't matter what Dirrell did. He was never going to win. The fix was in from the start

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Richmond, Va, USA
    Posts
    982
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1066
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: What More could Dirrell Have done

    I don't care how well you use the ring. I don't care how badly you make him miss. IF the opponent is determined enough, unscathed, and still landing shots then you can't rely on squeeking by.

    Make no mistake. I thought Dirrel won.

    I think this early loss in Dirrell's career is going to help him BIG in the long run. I didn't see a guy who was discouraged, angry, beaten, or disheartened. I saw him instantly say "I'm gonna hit the gym". This could prove to be Direll's greatest triumph to date.

    When he realized (come the 10th round) the ref wasn't cutting him any slack for holding all the time... He went to plan B. He landed bombs on Froch and moved even more effectively. Dirrell is going to move at a much faster pace his next fight. Mark my words. And God help Froch when they meet again!
    "Floyd needs to inject Xylocaine into his balls to gain the courage to fight Pacquiao."

    - and I quote from some random guy on the internet

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Hopeman, Scotland
    Posts
    3,773
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1197
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: What More could Dirrell Have done

    Dirrell should of fought the fight like he did in the later rounds.

    To be honest though, even though he fought a negative fight , he still landed way more and got robbed.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Posts
    2,720
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1051
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: What More could Dirrell Have done

    It's easy to say now that he should of did what he did at the end of the fight the whole fight because he didn't get KOed. Before the fight most thought that would have been the quickest way for him to get KOed.

    Everybody thought it best for dirrel to box move and stay away from the ropes. Not be the aggressor.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Posts
    2,720
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1051
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: What More could Dirrell Have done

    So what you all are saying is the things i listed are not enough for a fighter to win a fight

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Hopeman, Scotland
    Posts
    3,773
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1197
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: What More could Dirrell Have done

    Quote Originally Posted by The Boxer View Post
    So what you all are saying is the things i listed are not enough for a fighter to win a fight
    In my opinion, it was enough. Froch got a gift.

    He should of done less holding and running though.

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    British Columbia, Canada
    Posts
    18,766
    Mentioned
    15 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    4298
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: What More could Dirrell Have done

    Slightly off topic, but I still can't believe that Massimo Barrovecchio scored both 11 and 12 for Froch...

    BOXINGTALK

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Hopeman, Scotland
    Posts
    3,773
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1197
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: What More could Dirrell Have done

    Quote Originally Posted by CFH View Post
    Slightly off topic, but I still can't believe that Massimo Barrovecchio scored both 11 and 12 for Froch...

    BOXINGTALK
    The guy must of been blind.

    The last three rounds in the fight were clearly Dirrell rounds.

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    British Columbia, Canada
    Posts
    18,766
    Mentioned
    15 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    4298
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: What More could Dirrell Have done

    Quote Originally Posted by Pugilistic View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by CFH View Post
    Slightly off topic, but I still can't believe that Massimo Barrovecchio scored both 11 and 12 for Froch...

    BOXINGTALK
    The guy must of been blind.

    The last three rounds in the fight were clearly Dirrell rounds.
    If he'd scored the last two rounds correctly, the right fighter would have won.

  15. #15
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Hopeman, Scotland
    Posts
    3,773
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1197
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: What More could Dirrell Have done

    Quote Originally Posted by CFH View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Pugilistic View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by CFH View Post
    Slightly off topic, but I still can't believe that Massimo Barrovecchio scored both 11 and 12 for Froch...

    BOXINGTALK
    The guy must of been blind.

    The last three rounds in the fight were clearly Dirrell rounds.
    If he'd scored the last two rounds correctly, the right fighter would have won.
    Pure bullshit.

    Froch got a gift, If that fight was anywhere else, Dirrell would of got the decision he deserved.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

     

Similar Threads

  1. A new Dirrell FAN
    By Darth_Simasu in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 18
    Last Post: 10-20-2009, 09:05 PM
  2. my take on froch-dirrell
    By HattonTheHammer in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 10-20-2009, 12:56 PM
  3. Froch vs Dirrell
    By Tysonbruno in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 38
    Last Post: 10-13-2009, 07:17 PM
  4. Would like to see Mundine-Dirrell
    By Taeth in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 04-09-2009, 01:09 AM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  




Boxing | Boxing Photos | Boxing News | Boxing Forum | Boxing Rankings

Copyright © 2000 - 2024 Saddo Boxing - Boxing