Thread: How did you score Klitschko v Povetkin?

Originally Posted by erics44

check the post above for the difference between wlad fights and the hatton and Tzu fight

my argument has always been the ref is corrupt, that's why he gets away with what he does

its clear for everyone to see

Then by using YOUR logic this would mean the refs for Hatton's various foul fests were corrupt as well....and you said nothing about those fellas so therefore you are showing your bias now

Lyle,


Where does this intolerable nuthugging come from?

Do you think you're a bigger Klitschko fan than I am? You're not.

But did you SEE the fight Saturday?

What the fuck are you on about?

Christ I get tired of listening to your stupid ass talk about Wladimir. I LOVE him, I'm he and his brother's biggest fan. Saturday night he was a disgrace. I saw it, you saw it, we all saw it.

Where does this obsessive mancrush come from that blinds you to when he fights scared to death? You can't possibly be that stupid.

^^ what he said

Originally Posted by DynoMight

Lyle,


Where does this intolerable nuthugging come from?

Do you think you're a bigger Klitschko fan than I am? You're not.

But did you SEE the fight Saturday?

What the fuck are you on about?

Christ I get tired of listening to your stupid ass talk about Wladimir. I LOVE him, I'm he and his brother's biggest fan. Saturday night he was a disgrace. I saw it, you saw it, we all saw it.

Where does this obsessive mancrush come from that blinds you to when he fights scared to death? You can't possibly be that stupid.

I saw the fight, the fight was boring nobody is arguing that, but if you're going to argue "this guy fouls and it should be called" vs "This other guy fouled, but it didn't really matter because he didn't do it as much as the other guy" that's the ONLY issue I've had with people about the fight and that's the ONLY thing I've had an argument about.

Did you just assume I thought the fight was fantastic? Trust me, nobody (not even me) wants to see Wlad win a fight that way.....but he did win, he did so fairly, and that's that....on to the next defense.

id rather judges be corrupt and give a bad verdict than the extreme refereeing corruption of that fight

least with bad judges you get a fight first

with ref corruption like that where the ref does everything to make a fighter win just makes the fight unbareable

and youd expect them to at least try and hide it as well

Originally Posted by erics44

id rather judges be corrupt and give a bad verdict than the extreme refereeing corruption of that fight

least with bad judges you get a fight first

with ref corruption like that where the ref does everything to make a fighter win just makes the fight unbareable

and youd expect them to at least try and hide it as well

Yup, those corrupt refs....let me tell you

No Lyle, abandon that shit immediately. I haven't brought up any comparison of fouls between fighters because I'M NOT RETARDED.

Who gives a shit what another fighter got away with? I'm talking about Saturday. Povetkin vs Wlad. I don't give a rat's ass what you want to contrast it with.

Wlad, my favorite heavyweight since Tyson, fought like a bitch on Saturday. Even my wife was disgusted, and she doesn't know shit about anything.

Your level of denial regarding the way Wlad resorts to whatever the fuck works to protect that chin is borderline neurotic, and I can only imagine your walls covered with life size posters of the man like mine was with Hulk Hogan when I was 10.

Fucking stop it, you willfully dishonest assclown. He fought like a terrified kitten after round 2, and all I want from you is to either still your tongue in the justification department when it comes to Wlad's antics or to admit it was an UTTER SHIT EMBARASSING performance and you hope he finds his nuts in the next one.

MORE IMPORTANTLY, please, for the love of god, tell me why he's immune to criticism in your eyes. Are you guys friends? Are you in his will? Where the shit does your unwavering loyalty to his Ukranian jock even come from??

You've jumped in midstream to my arguing with erics44, now very well you might not be retarded and you aren't trying to compare and contrast fighters, but erics44 IS and that's who my responses have been to.

Wlad's NOT immune to criticism, people can talk about he's boring all the time I don't care. I never have. I DO care when they bitch about HIS fouling while they never said anything about fouling that other fighters have done. It's hypocritical to call 1 fighter out for fouling while turning a blind eye to others is it not.

My entire discussion hasn't been defending the actual fight at all, but just saying it was fair for Wlad if the ref isn't calling fouls to continue doing what he was doing as all fighters would do. Again, it's not about the FIGHT, but about the FOULS or rather the perceived fouls since the ref didn't call them....why is that wrong?

Originally Posted by El Kabong

Originally Posted by erics44

id rather judges be corrupt and give a bad verdict than the extreme refereeing corruption of that fight

least with bad judges you get a fight first

with ref corruption like that where the ref does everything to make a fighter win just makes the fight unbareable

and youd expect them to at least try and hide it as well

Yup, those corrupt refs....let me tell you

Great job of undermining your own argument. Hatton showed more desire in 5 seconds of that clip than Wlad did in the whole Povetkin fight. Hatton was not the overwhelming favourite, he did not tower over Tzsyu. Where was Wlads aggression ? Where was His will to win against a far less able Povetkin? Purlease