Thread: Is Floyd an ATG?

Is he an ATG, or has he avoided too many fighters?

I would say in terms of pure ability, he's up there with the very best.

I guarantee you, if he fought and beat Pacquiao back in 2009-2010, people would be calling him a top 10 ATG.

Yes, Floyd is an Arrogant Troubled Gay. It seems pretty obvious to me.

Originally Posted by VG_Addict

Is he an ATG, or has he avoided too many fighters?

I would say in terms of pure ability, he's up there with the very best.

I guarantee you, if he fought and beat Pacquiao back in 2009-2010, people would be calling him a top 10 ATG.

Why do you have to be such a twerp no matter what forum your on!

Of course he is an ATG, despite being an utter wanker, he is still among the greatest boxers of all time by far.

Get a hold of yourself.

I think Floyd is an ATG. Where he belongs on that list is a question I don't know the answer to.
What I want to know is what in the world does the fact that Floyd is an arrogant prick, ass, has problem with women, or anything else have to do with it? If every ATG had to meet a nice guy standard 75% of them would probably be gone.

Originally Posted by beenKOed

I think Floyd is an ATG. Where he belongs on that list is a question I don't know the answer to.
What I want to know is what in the world does the fact that Floyd is an arrogant prick, ass, has problem with women, or anything else have to do with it? If every ATG had to meet a nice guy standard 75% of them would probably be gone.

Remember that SRR was a wife beater.

Whatever Floyd and Leonard did outside the ring is irrelevant. They could have been rapists for all I care..

Floyd is no doubt an Atg..

Originally Posted by VG_Addict

Is he an ATG, or has he avoided too many fighters?

I would say in terms of pure ability, he's up there with the very best.

I guarantee you, if he fought and beat Pacquiao back in 2009-2010, people would be calling him a top 10 ATG.

First what is "your" criteria for ATG?

Why would a great boxer beating a great fighter both past thier physical primes make a difference in ranking either one of them, other than what you have already to place them on your list. I guarantee you, that most ATG lists that have been made, have changed over the last 20 years even though nothing in history has changed.

Originally Posted by fan johnny

Originally Posted by VG_Addict

Is he an ATG, or has he avoided too many fighters?

I would say in terms of pure ability, he's up there with the very best.

I guarantee you, if he fought and beat Pacquiao back in 2009-2010, people would be calling him a top 10 ATG.

First what is "your" criteria for ATG?

Why would a great boxer beating a great fighter both past thier physical primes make a difference in ranking either one of them, other than what you have already to place them on your list. I guarantee you, that most ATG lists that have been made, have changed over the last 20 years even though nothing in history has changed.

Past their physical primes? What? Pacquiao was at his best in 2009-2010.