Re: Rigo to lose his WBO belt soon
I can see not being able to unify as a reason none of the big name players will fight you. Losing your belt is a result of not paying sanctioning fees or fighting mandatories (which is entirely possible if your attached to a network that wont approve opponents for a televised fight. That though is the result of the contract with the network, or the named fighters.
I agree with you about getting into the rankings. Its an interesting scenario for once because, we see the division between notoriety, earning power and technical skill. Believe it or not its good for boxing in that the steering of the division by a single talent with an undefeated record, does not automatically equate to rule changing and demands. I'm sure there are plenty of people that will fight Rigo for notoriety. They may not have a chance in hell. but some have to be ranked and some have to be waiting for their long awaited mandatory shot. People used to pick apart roy for fighting his mandatories. But he defended all his belts. Now you can drop the belts and chase the money or be a proud champion. Rigo is finding out that no matter what floyd pulled in vegas or with his douchey money persona. Sometimes you can't have both. With 15 fights, he has no reason to cry that he's earned some kind of leniency. That's just my opinion of course.
p.s. Now the interesting thing to me is the guy who lost the belt to rigo (30 months ago) and been trying to reinvent himself or at least get back to his old style by fighting in obscurity (since being ko'd by walters), would be in line to fight for this vacant strap. Sometimes a little humility goes a long way.
They want your @$$ beat because upsets make news. News brings about excitement, excitement brings about ratings. The objective is to bring you up to the tower and tear your @$$ down. And if you don't believe that, you're crazy.
Roy Jones, Jr. "What I've Learned," Esquire 2003
Bookmarks