Back in the day, the WBA belt was THEE BELT. But then the IBF came along, and the WBC before that. But now the WBA is a total joke- I mean, their champions are no names and just a pathetic org, when the WBA title holder was "typically" the lineal champion as well. The only reason to have a WBA belt is if have sentimental issues with boxing.
The WBC didn't gain real prominence until just recently- they always had sanctioning issues, dodgy rankings and useless eliminator fights.
But, the WBC has made a fantastic about turn. They ARE the organization of record. Their champions are slightly better and their mandatory match-making is a little better than most others.
The WBO has made great strides, but they are still considered the lesser of the big four- but I do have them slightly ahead of the WBA in prominence.
To me now, here is how I rate the importance of the big four:
WBC
IBF
WBO/WBA
Bookmarks