Boxing Forums



User Tag List

Thanks Thanks:  0
Likes Likes:  0
Dislikes Dislikes:  0
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 16 to 21 of 21

Thread: WBC order Pascal vs B-Hop II

Share/Bookmark
  1. #16
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    British Columbia, Canada
    Posts
    18,766
    Mentioned
    15 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    4304
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: WBC order Pascal vs B-Hop II

    Quote Originally Posted by No Contest View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by ruthless rocco View Post
    pascal will beat hopkins this time around...
    but he would lose to dawson.
    so this is good for everyone but chad.
    I think Pascal is gonna opt to fight Dawson. I dont think he wants another ass whooping by someone old enough to be his daddy. What makes you think he will win? He had no answers and if not for horrific judging and bad refereeing he would have lost.
    He'll lose to either guy IMO.

  2. #17
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Posts
    4,900
    Mentioned
    84 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    843
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: WBC order Pascal vs B-Hop II

    Quote Originally Posted by CFH View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by No Contest View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by ruthless rocco View Post
    pascal will beat hopkins this time around...
    but he would lose to dawson.
    so this is good for everyone but chad.
    I think Pascal is gonna opt to fight Dawson. I dont think he wants another ass whooping by someone old enough to be his daddy. What makes you think he will win? He had no answers and if not for horrific judging and bad refereeing he would have lost.
    He'll lose to either guy IMO.

    i'm not a big fan of pascal. my brother kept telling me he was good. i didn't really see it... but he's better than he showed against hopkins. i didn't see him do anything from the second round on. i don't believe it was bernard's skills that shut pascal down...he pretty much stalled from the start on his own. hopkins then turned it up and took over. i believe pascal will come in trained and prepared with a fight plan and strategy that will allow him to win...i can't see him doing worse than he did the last time against b-hop and i acknowledge that he got very lucky with the reffing and the judges.

    ...as for dawson, i think he can smoothly cruise to victory against the smaller pascal with a strong jab keeping the fight on the outside followed by big bombs. pascal fought the fight of his life against dawson and got lucky with the clash of heads, whereas dawson looked pretty terrible most of the fight but appeared to be the better harder hitter who seemed to be the stronger fighter when he asserted himself effectively. if he's being trained by emmanual stewart and if he listens to what he's told i see him keeping pascal outside with relative ease and maybe even knocking him out while pascal is lunging in.

  3. #18
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Posts
    3,880
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1470
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: WBC order Pascal vs B-Hop II

    Quote Originally Posted by No Contest View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by ruthless rocco View Post
    pascal will beat hopkins this time around...
    but he would lose to dawson.
    so this is good for everyone but chad.
    I think Pascal is gonna opt to fight Dawson. I dont think he wants another ass whooping by someone old enough to be his daddy. What makes you think he will win? He had no answers and if not for horrific judging and bad refereeing he would have lost.

    Would think he will get more money and recognition if he fights Hopkins again.He can always fight Dawson after that.
    Balls

  4. #19
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    In a hole in the ground
    Posts
    23,387
    Mentioned
    19 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    3313
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: WBC order Pascal vs B-Hop II

    Although I'm pleased for Bhop I don't think it's the WBC doing the right thing at all, it's not the right thing.

    They have officially elected judges who judge the fight and their result should stand. You can't just overide them because you feel like it, and it wasn't that controversial anyway.

    There have been far worse decisions where a rematch hasn't been ordered. It's nothing about fairness and rather them favouring the bigger name fighter.

    The first Toney Peter match was ordered to be refought as well.

    When it's an upopular fighter who wins however ala Santa Cruz against Casamayor, an ancient Holyfield against Valuev, or a Kotelnik against Devon Alexander, then not a word from the sanctioning bodies.

    Anyone who thinks this has anything to do with the WBC being fair is completely wrong. They just want the cash from a rematch. Fuck them.

    And it's not even fair. According to the rules set up by them the three judges deemed it a draw. Pascal is being forced to refight even though he held on to his title according to their rules, because B Hop is a very big name in boxing. Had he fought Jesse Brinkley with the same outcome the WBC would be completely silent.

  5. #20
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    Kent, England
    Posts
    989
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    749
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: WBC order Pascal vs B-Hop II

    Quote Originally Posted by Bilbo View Post
    Although I'm pleased for Bhop I don't think it's the WBC doing the right thing at all, it's not the right thing.

    They have officially elected judges who judge the fight and their result should stand. You can't just overide them because you feel like it, and it wasn't that controversial anyway.

    There have been far worse decisions where a rematch hasn't been ordered. It's nothing about fairness and rather them favouring the bigger name fighter.

    The first Toney Peter match was ordered to be refought as well.

    When it's an upopular fighter who wins however ala Santa Cruz against Casamayor, an ancient Holyfield against Valuev, or a Kotelnik against Devon Alexander, then not a word from the sanctioning bodies.

    Anyone who thinks this has anything to do with the WBC being fair is completely wrong. They just want the cash from a rematch. Fuck them.

    And it's not even fair. According to the rules set up by them the three judges deemed it a draw. Pascal is being forced to refight even though he held on to his title according to their rules, because B Hop is a very big name in boxing. Had he fought Jesse Brinkley with the same outcome the WBC would be completely silent.
    Would they not get the same money if Pascal fought Dawson instead anyway? I don't understand how it all works with the sanctioning bodies except they seem to do what suits themselves. I know they get a sanctioning fee, is that a percentage of the total purse or something?

  6. #21
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Posts
    4,900
    Mentioned
    84 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    843
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: WBC order Pascal vs B-Hop II

    Quote Originally Posted by Bilbo View Post
    Although I'm pleased for Bhop I don't think it's the WBC doing the right thing at all, it's not the right thing.

    They have officially elected judges who judge the fight and their result should stand. You can't just overide them because you feel like it, and it wasn't that controversial anyway.

    There have been far worse decisions where a rematch hasn't been ordered. It's nothing about fairness and rather them favouring the bigger name fighter.

    The first Toney Peter match was ordered to be refought as well.

    When it's an upopular fighter who wins however ala Santa Cruz against Casamayor, an ancient Holyfield against Valuev, or a Kotelnik against Devon Alexander, then not a word from the sanctioning bodies.

    Anyone who thinks this has anything to do with the WBC being fair is completely wrong. They just want the cash from a rematch. Fuck them.

    And it's not even fair. According to the rules set up by them the three judges deemed it a draw. Pascal is being forced to refight even though he held on to his title according to their rules, because B Hop is a very big name in boxing. Had he fought Jesse Brinkley with the same outcome the WBC would be completely silent.


    very very true!

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

     

Similar Threads

  1. Mr Chris N! Congrats are in order
    By Tito BHB in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 11
    Last Post: 07-12-2007, 06:08 AM
  2. Top 5 heavys Now in order
    By Pro BOXER18 in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 32
    Last Post: 01-11-2007, 04:32 AM
  3. Should i order this sat HBOPPV??
    By TaxanBaller in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 36
    Last Post: 10-20-2006, 09:16 PM
  4. Did anyone order some C*NTS over the weekend...?
    By smashup in forum Off Topic
    Replies: 28
    Last Post: 05-20-2006, 11:36 AM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  




Boxing | Boxing Photos | Boxing News | Boxing Forum | Boxing Rankings

Copyright © 2000 - 2024 Saddo Boxing - Boxing