Originally Posted by
B@rr3r@
Isnt it weird.
Firstly, how many fights have there been this year, that on this board alone, people have gone crazy at each other, for the simple fact they thought the fightwe who lost won the fight, or the fight who won the fight, did win the fight.
I mean for me, Collazo won the fight, when I watched it first, but when I watched it second time Haqtton won the fight. (I am a Hatton fan) I marked Hatton lower because he was my favourite so if he lost I knew he would be scored higher, and given it was close, If I had been unbiased he would have won the fight....
Many of you will disagree.
When I watched the Barrera v Juarez fight, I had it a draw, but this time, give Barrera more rounds maybe I shouldnt.
Second time round, I had it a draw....
Jermaine Taylor v Wright, Wright all the way.. second time round, Wright.
Wright style does him no favours, simple fact taylor hit Wrights arms, but for some reason, it doesnt matter, so I could see why Wright was frustrated, he doesnt seem to have the killer blow, so he had to rely on decisions, and we know nowadays, no fighter should do that. (Look at Jermaines face.)
This brings me on to the, well lets say so many preople say, "The Fighter Who Can Turn Up And Lose and STILL Win The Fight"
Oscar De La Hoya....
If I am 100% honest and scored it from as a Tito fan, I truthfully could never give it Tito, Oscar always won that fight. If I watched Moseley and Oscar 2nd Fight, Oscar won the fight, although 10% of me could see why Moseley got it.
Oscar v Sturm 60% v 40% Sturm could have go the decision.
Thing is....Oscar gets slated for having gift decisions, but the 2 most defining fights of his carrrer, which seems the fans knew he won, he officially lost.
I never seem to grasp how people say he got the gift decisions.
Maybe I am biased because everyone knows I am a massive Oscar fan, but when I am scoring and my favourite is fighting, I Bias the other fighter....on the scorecards.
Morale of the post, we all see fights differently, and unless its a absolute daylight robbery (Rabah v Urango) then we cant argue with the judges, because end of the day, although they get paid, they are no different than us.
We all see matches in a different light, and if we didnt, boards like Saddos wouldnt exist....
Boxings all about opinions....
Bookmarks