Well what do you think?
I think gun laws in the US are crazy.
I know the counter argument is you need them to protect your home and so on but how many people have to die brfore they are at leas changed.
Well what do you think?
I think gun laws in the US are crazy.
I know the counter argument is you need them to protect your home and so on but how many people have to die brfore they are at leas changed.
Balls
ok gun laws wont change shit and heres why:
Just because someone can't get one legally doesn't mean they cant get one
Everything in the world is dangerous when a crazy idiot is in possesion of it (hell every house in the world has something in it that can be turned into a bomb)
People in america trust politicians that they think are bent on turning the country into a liberal dictatorship as far as their gun has range
In conclusion: Don't take the guns off the street, take the idiots that use them off the street.
Guns are not inherently good or bad....they take on the qualities of the shooter.Originally Posted by porkypara
I like the ability to own guns, it's for safety, protection, and defense of your constitutional rights.
I've shot fully automatic weapons and I know plenty of people with conceal and carry licenses and honestly they are the LAST people you need to worry about causing trouble.
Also if guns are illegal then only criminals have them!
The US gun laws at least give us a fair chance
BTW special licenses are needed for conceal and carry, and to own fully automatic weapons. Many people disagree with me and say "Fully automatic firearms are illegal"....no they are not you just need a special license to own them and it's very difficult to get such a license, we're talking deep background checks and it's a FEDERAL process.
The US South, including Texas probably has the most firearms per capita in the US and very few LEGAL GUN OWNERS commit deadly crimes with their firearms
the common argument is that it is not the guns that are harmful but the people who use them....
But if guns were abolished then the so called "idiots" can't shoot nobody, if that south korean didn't have a firearm then there is no way in hell he could of shot 32 people.
If a weapon is available to someone, ofcourse there is going to be a strong chance of usuage....a man is only a so called idiot once he uses the gun on somebody else, and by then it's too late.
If no guns existed in the USA the crime rate would reduce, its by removing the availabilty to use a weapon of mass murder.
FACT!!! at present LONDON is P4P more violent than any city in the US currently.
Saw it on BBC news while having me breakfast
This would not have happened if guns were outlawed.
always thought most of london was a shithole (south), glad i gtfoOriginally Posted by Smashup
No offense :-)
The One.....crazy people find a way to cause damage.
Pipe Bomb anyone
I mean there are a number of ways to kill a huge number of people....guns aren't the only things that can kill people.
Places that have outlawed guns, England, Australia actually have higher rates of gun violence than the US.
Originally Posted by The_One77
South London is and has always been Bandit Country
Well said.Originally Posted by Punisher136
Let's put it into perspective. That was a horrible tragedy. But the guns are a branch of the problem, not the root. Many other things kill more than 33 people a day, but we always want to "educate" people on how to use it safer.
Drunk driving
Smoking
Prescription medication
Seriously much higher body count. The problem is what led this kid to have no respect for human life, and to want to kill 33 people. Guns are important for our government to not get over confident in their power. Instill a little healthy fear into them. More laws don't prevent the problem every shooting violates tons of laws. Laws don't prevent crime. Yes, a nut can do alot of damage in a short time with a gun, but if there was no gun that nut would do alot of damage over a long time. It makes for shorter careers of mass murderers, but wouldn't prevent it.
London is P4P more dangerous than any city in the USA? HAHAHAHAH Shut the fuck up.
Dont doute it for a second fella.Originally Posted by Lyle
The problem is,in the uk for example if a nutter loses the plot he does not have acsses to leathel weopons that a lot of armys would be jelous of.
Balls
you can get guns from unlegit sources and if u dont have guns like lyle said theres bombs and stuff they could make out of just about anything.
as for england being more violent than any city in america its very possible. now granted more than 50 people die nationwide everyday from guns in one way or another. Maybe our countrys wouldn't be so messed up if our language was designed better. what do i mean? look at this shit:
I'm going to read the green book today because I read the red book last month.
There are two words spelled exactly the same that have different pronounciations and meaning then you have another word thats spelled differently but pronounced like one of the other words. No wonder when people come over here and try to learn our language they wanna blow shit up.
Then to make matters worse we have geeks at harvard (who for the record cant get laid and wanna feel like they have some impact in the world) that change the rules about quotation marks and periods. Tell me does it go inside or out side of the quotes? WRONG!
well judging from that korean nutter's english skills I dont think cared to much about the conventions of the english language, unless of course this murder spree was caused by his inability to tell the difference between a standard colon and semi-colon. There's a frustrated writer in all of us. In which case I'll stand corrected. For the time being I'm prepared to put it down to him being fucking crazy.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks