true........... same with holmes who i still think is underratedOriginally Posted by Lyle
people should appreciate we have a fighter that can unify....
true........... same with holmes who i still think is underratedOriginally Posted by Lyle
people should appreciate we have a fighter that can unify....
All I have to say about this is that one of their kind (Klitschko hater)has got to pay me and as I pocket my winnings I will bring up the Vitali-Jameel fight.
WHO NEXT ?Hidden Content
You best pray to your god that Wlad never EVER loses another fight for the rest of his natural born life.Originally Posted by Lyle
You're such a hater....don't fucking try it. I stuck with Wladimir threw the Sanders loss, the Brewster loss, the trouble he had vs Williamson and honestly your argument against Wlad has never changed no matter how much he has improved and that gives me the grounds to knight youOriginally Posted by Punisher136
YOU HAVE BEEN KNIGHTED....SIR PUNK ASS HATER OF SADDO BOXING
So tell me again how much of a bum mayweather is?Originally Posted by Lyle
He is a true bum because he thinks he's the greatest, he hasn't unified or TRIED to unify in any of the 5 divisions he has held a title in, and he doesn't try to finish anyone off.
And let me explain that in regards to the Klitschko-Brewster II fight.
#1: Wladimir first tried to get a unification fight
#2: Wladimir still doesn't consider himself great and he tries to improve in every fight
#3: Wladimir didn't really try to stop Brewster because of the first fight...Wlad tried to finish Lamon too early and he lost. Wlad learned from his mistake.
#4: Wlad gives his opponents all the respect in the world but he still KO's a ton of them 44 out of 49
Wlad being humble and trying to unify makes up for his flaws in my opinion......Floyd being a punk ass and saying he's the greatest and never trying to unify makes up for his TALENT.
So yes if Floyd wasn't an asshole, I might take it easy on him
Interesting. Beating people in 5 divisions (some fringe HOFr's) is less impressive than getting your ass handed to you by 2 good fighters and a journeymen in 1 division (which is a sorry one at that). 2 and 4 don't have shit to do with boxing. Being nice doesn't make you a great fighter, its boxing not the miss america pageant. Ok wlad "tried" to get a unification fight. The most recognizeable heavyweight in the world can't negotiate unification terms but changaev and ibragimov can? Thats makes senseOriginally Posted by Lyle
Plus he refused a 20 million offer from Muhammad to fight Evander, now he breaks his hand, man, yo guys in America are losing it to them, next time unifications are gonna take place in Moskow and 76 year old Larry will freeze do Death before makin his last telecast commentsOriginally Posted by Punisher136
Originally Posted by Punisher136
even if klitchko loses again he will still be a d@mn good HW in most people eyes, if he doesnt lose than he will be the best of this era and a top 10-20 HW all time
....he was never THE champion of any of the 5 divisions he's been in.....and what of the Ray Leonard's, Roberto Duran's, Tommy Hearns, Roy Jones Jr.'s? Should their unifying divisions not come into question when you compare them with Floyd
Well here's the selling point on Wlad unifying....you can either keep your title or fight the best guy out there and MAYBE someone will beat Wlad. BUT the other title holders haven't really come close to fighting each other until just recently
Wlad is only 31 he CAN still become a great champion.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks