Boxing Forums



User Tag List

Thanks Thanks:  0
Likes Likes:  0
Dislikes Dislikes:  0
Page 5 of 6 FirstFirst ... 3456 LastLast
Results 61 to 75 of 86

Thread: P4P bias towards American based fighters?

Share/Bookmark
  1. #61
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    The Bay Area
    Posts
    14,471
    Mentioned
    14 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    2841
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: P4P bias towards American based fighters?

    So they're fighting in baseball stadiums? How many of those stadiums you listed have had a fight in the past 5 years?

  2. #62
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Posts
    7,899
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    0
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: P4P bias towards American based fighters?

    Quote Originally Posted by amat View Post
    We get it, you are important. With that said, what does a list of stadiums where they don't hold boxing cards have to do with P4P lists having a bias towards Americans?
    Yankee Stadium
    Held fights?
    Yes
    The Spectrum in Philly
    Held fights?
    Yes
    List could go on endlessly
    Yes
    If there are more fighters,and more venues that can hold fights,sooner or later you will fight in the States
    Fenster wants exclusion of every fighter who's fought in the states,well guess where the money is,in the states

  3. #63
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    The Bay Area
    Posts
    14,471
    Mentioned
    14 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    2841
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: P4P bias towards American based fighters?

    Endlessly? Really? Let's see you name more then 5 of the stadiums you listed that have had cards within the last 10 years. That's the only way anything you posted is at all relevant to the discussion.

  4. #64
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    The Bay Area
    Posts
    14,471
    Mentioned
    14 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    2841
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: P4P bias towards American based fighters?

    Using those rules, Yankee Stadium wouldn't count. Neither would any of those. Please this is nonsense dribble ruining a fairly interesting topic.

  5. #65
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    This Lunatic Asylum
    Posts
    23,278
    Mentioned
    428 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    3061
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: P4P bias towards American based fighters?

    Quote Originally Posted by Trainer Monkey View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Fenster View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Trainer Monkey View Post
    You asked a simple question,does the United States have more stadiums then the rest of the world,you got your answer
    And its pretty conclusive


    I never asked that question. I never even mentioned stadiums. Venue!!! That was YOUR word - Venue!!!

    Venue could be a small club, or sports hall, or pub (bar)

    You donut
    Considering you were talking about title fights,I was pretty sure that was a safe assumptive
    I mean it was supposed to be about P4P champions,I dont think their fighting in bars
    And if they are,there's a trainer somewhere crying
    They're not fighting in stadiums either.

    Most big fights in America are held in Vegas.. maybe New York - MSG.. Los Angeles. Especially if involving a non-American.

    How many fights per year are held in US stadiums?
    Last edited by Fenster; 02-09-2009 at 10:10 PM.
    3-Time SADDO PREDICTION COMP CHAMPION.

  6. #66
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    This Lunatic Asylum
    Posts
    23,278
    Mentioned
    428 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    3061
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: P4P bias towards American based fighters?

    Quote Originally Posted by amat View Post
    Endlessly? Really? Let's see you name more then 5 of the stadiums you listed that have had cards within the last 10 years. That's the only way anything you posted is at all relevant to the discussion.
    I missed this. I guess he's already looking for the answer
    3-Time SADDO PREDICTION COMP CHAMPION.

  7. #67
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Posts
    7,899
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    0
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: P4P bias towards American based fighters?

    Quote Originally Posted by amat View Post
    Endlessly? Really? Let's see you name more then 5 of the stadiums you listed that have had cards within the last 10 years. That's the only way anything you posted is at all relevant to the discussion.
    MSG would be in there,just recently scheduled




    2009-05-07Main Street Armory, Rochester, New York, United States


    2009-05-02MGM Grand, Las Vegas, Nevada, United States


    2009-05-01Blue Horizon, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States


    2009-04-25The Village, Little Rock, Arkansas, United States


    2009-04-11Mandalay Bay Resort & Casino, Las Vegas, Nevada, United States


    2009-04-11Woodlands Resort, Wilkes-Barre, Pennsylvania, United States


    2009-04-11City Armory, Lynchburg, Virginia, United States


    2009-04-10Morongo Casino Resort & Spa, Cabazon, California, United States


    2009-04-04Texas, United States


    2009-04-04Masonic Temple, Norfolk, Virginia, United States


    2009-04-03Amelia Island, Fernandina Beach, Florida, United States






    2009-03-28Red & Jerrys, Denver, Colorado, United States


    2009-03-28Grand Casino, Hinckley, Minnesota, United States


    2009-03-28Harlingen Field, Harlingen, Texas, United States


    2009-03-27United States


    2009-03-27A La Carte Event Pavilion, Tampa, Florida, United States


    2009-03-21Playboy Mansion, Beverly Hills, California, United States


    2009-03-21Civic Center, Pensacola, Florida, United States


    2009-03-21Ramada Inn, Saint Joseph, Missouri, United States






    2009-03-16Madison Square Garden, New York, New York, United States


    2009-03-14Dorchester Armory, Dorchester, Massachusetts, United States

  8. #68
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    The Bay Area
    Posts
    14,471
    Mentioned
    14 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    2841
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: P4P bias towards American based fighters?

    Back to the topic at hand, when did Calzaghe and Hatton crack the P4P lists? Surely Joe made it before fighting Hopkins and Hatton never fought stateside until he fought Collazo. I'm not sure if he was on the P4P lists by that time or not but I'm fairly confident he was.

    Abraham doesn't really have a case to be on the P4P list because the only guy he has beaten that opens any eyes is Miranda. Ivan Calderon was at the 10 spot in the January issue which I have right now. He may have fought in the US before but he's definitely a Puerto Rico based fighter.

    Actually, I'll go ahead and list the guys in the Ring 100 who haven't fought in America or who at least aren't American based.

    10. Calderon
    18. Abraham
    19. John
    20. Kessler
    23. Hasegawa
    32. Naito
    35. Haye
    37. Gonzalez
    43. Pongslakek
    44. Sakata
    45. Erdei
    48. Valero

    Those are it for the top 50. I think most of those are about right but there are some American fighters who probably are to high up on the list like Pavlik at 11.
    Last edited by amat; 02-09-2009 at 10:21 PM.

  9. #69
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    This Lunatic Asylum
    Posts
    23,278
    Mentioned
    428 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    3061
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: P4P bias towards American based fighters?

    Quote Originally Posted by Trainer Monkey View Post
    Fenster wants exclusion of every fighter who's fought in the states
    What does that even mean? Seriously
    3-Time SADDO PREDICTION COMP CHAMPION.

  10. #70
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Posts
    7,899
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    0
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: P4P bias towards American based fighters?

    Quote Originally Posted by Fenster View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Trainer Monkey View Post
    Fenster wants exclusion of every fighter who's fought in the states
    What does that even mean? Seriously
    Every time we pointed out a foreign based fighter is in the top ten,that would be 8 out out of the top 10 by the way,you claimed it didnt count because theyd fought in the states at some point

  11. #71
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    This Lunatic Asylum
    Posts
    23,278
    Mentioned
    428 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    3061
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: P4P bias towards American based fighters?

    Quote Originally Posted by Trainer Monkey View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Fenster View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Trainer Monkey View Post
    Fenster wants exclusion of every fighter who's fought in the states
    What does that even mean? Seriously
    Every time we pointed out a foreign based fighter is in the top ten,that would be 8 out out of the top 10 by the way,you claimed it didnt count because theyd fought in the states at some point
    Well it doesn't count. My question was spefically about fighters without ties to America. I can see the word "based" confused you. But i did explain a billion times what i meant.

    The answer is just ONE fighter.
    Last edited by Fenster; 02-09-2009 at 10:47 PM.
    3-Time SADDO PREDICTION COMP CHAMPION.

  12. #72
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Posts
    7,899
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    0
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: P4P bias towards American based fighters?

    Quote Originally Posted by Fenster View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Trainer Monkey View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Fenster View Post

    What does that even mean? Seriously
    Every time we pointed out a foreign based fighter is in the top ten,that would be 8 out out of the top 10 by the way,you claimed it didnt count because theyd fought in the states at some point
    Well it doesn't count. My question was spefically about fighters without ties to America. I can see the word "based" confused you. But i did explain a billion times after what i meant.

    The answer is just ONE fighter.
    And the answer is,with bigger venues,larger paychecks,and more fighters to choose from,sooner or later your coming to the states
    Which Ive said a dozen times now

  13. #73
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    This Lunatic Asylum
    Posts
    23,278
    Mentioned
    428 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    3061
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: P4P bias towards American based fighters?

    Quote Originally Posted by amat View Post
    Back to the topic at hand, when did Calzaghe and Hatton crack the P4P lists? Surely Joe made it before fighting Hopkins and Hatton never fought stateside until he fought Collazo. I'm not sure if he was on the P4P lists by that time or not but I'm fairly confident he was.

    Abraham doesn't really have a case to be on the P4P list because the only guy he has beaten that opens any eyes is Miranda. Ivan Calderon was at the 10 spot in the January issue which I have right now. He may have fought in the US before but he's definitely a Puerto Rico based fighter.

    Actually, I'll go ahead and list the guys in the Ring 100 who haven't fought in America or who at least aren't American based.

    10. Calderon
    18. Abraham
    19. John
    20. Kessler
    23. Hasegawa
    32. Naito
    35. Haye
    37. Gonzalez
    43. Pongslakek
    44. Sakata
    45. Erdei
    46. Wlad
    47. Vitali
    48. Valero

    Those are it for the top 50. I think most of those are about right but there are some American fighters who probably are to high up on the list like Pavlik at 11.
    Hatton after beating Tszyu and Calzaghe when he beat Lacy.


    I was just trying to show how crap P4P is. But really it just highlighted America is the daddy of boxing. Without a connection to the States a fighter will never get recognition.

    Fair enough. That's the way she goes... most top fighters want to fight in the States anyway.
    3-Time SADDO PREDICTION COMP CHAMPION.

  14. #74
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    This Lunatic Asylum
    Posts
    23,278
    Mentioned
    428 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    3061
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: P4P bias towards American based fighters?

    Quote Originally Posted by Trainer Monkey View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Fenster View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Trainer Monkey View Post
    Every time we pointed out a foreign based fighter is in the top ten,that would be 8 out out of the top 10 by the way,you claimed it didnt count because theyd fought in the states at some point
    Well it doesn't count. My question was spefically about fighters without ties to America. I can see the word "based" confused you. But i did explain a billion times after what i meant.

    The answer is just ONE fighter.
    And the answer is,with bigger venues,larger paychecks,and more fighters to choose from,sooner or later your coming to the states
    Which Ive said a dozen times now
    Stop with the bigger venues crap. Germany, Britain, Japan they fight in front of huge audiences. MOST big fights happen in Vegas.

    Ive shown you DON'T need to fight in the States to be P4P ranked.

    America has the glamour the glitz and pizzazz, so naturally will produce popular fighters who inturn will become P4P rated.
    Last edited by Fenster; 02-09-2009 at 10:48 PM.
    3-Time SADDO PREDICTION COMP CHAMPION.

  15. #75
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Posts
    285
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    997
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: P4P bias towards American based fighters?

    Quote Originally Posted by Fenster View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Trainer Monkey View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Fenster View Post

    Well it doesn't count. My question was spefically about fighters without ties to America. I can see the word "based" confused you. But i did explain a billion times after what i meant.

    The answer is just ONE fighter.
    And the answer is,with bigger venues,larger paychecks,and more fighters to choose from,sooner or later your coming to the states
    Which Ive said a dozen times now
    Stop with the bigger venues crap. Germany, Britain, Japan they fight in front of huge audiences. MOST big fights happen in Vegas.

    Ive shown you DON'T need to fight in the States to be P4P ranked.

    America has the glamour the glitz and pizzazz, so naturally will produce popular fighters who inturn will become P4P rated.

    i think UK can create their own P4P list... why bother US P4P list if you don't agree with it.. Lets get real here, lots of big fights happen in america, im not saying happening only in america. If you dont fight in US how are they going to rate you? same goes to UK and other countries. So go on create your UK P4P myth list nobody is going to stop you guys anyway.. stop this America bias crap..

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

     

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 7
    Last Post: 12-24-2008, 03:14 AM
  2. Replies: 32
    Last Post: 11-21-2008, 06:32 PM
  3. Best American fighters P4P active right now...
    By PRIDE OF BOSTON in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 22
    Last Post: 07-09-2008, 01:27 AM
  4. Stop The Boxing Bias
    By Bx730NY in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 20
    Last Post: 04-23-2008, 06:24 AM
  5. German based fighters?
    By eagle in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 26
    Last Post: 10-04-2007, 01:05 PM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  




Boxing | Boxing Photos | Boxing News | Boxing Forum | Boxing Rankings

Copyright © 2000 - 2024 Saddo Boxing - Boxing