Originally Posted by
OumaFan
LOL, you're just messing with me now or you have Alzheimers, one of the two.
I can't believe you with your utter hatred of small guys pick one to put on your list but its the wrong fucking one.
I don't hate them at all
I just assess them more realistically.
I think people treat little guys the way they treat animals. I.e a show a Cappacin Monkey breaking a nut and people will go 'Aww look at how clever they are!'.
Well its relative, yes they can use stones to crack nuts but but that's not exactly going to send a monkey to the moon is it?
It's the same with little guys, one of them shows some defence and he's a little Mayweather, knock a guy out and he's a mini Tyson.
The standards of comparison are just ridicously low. Never mind that they are fighting in a pool of about 300 fellow pro's worldwide, and that most are part time and combine boxing with fishing, goat herding and paper rounds, people give them maximum credit for beating these 13-3-3 guys and equate it to being equal to or even better than beating an unbeaten challenger in the welterweight division.
It's all nonsense really. If a 112 lber is really p4p he can move up and beat guys up to 122 at least. Manny did it, J M Marquez has done it.
these other guys, if they can only rule their pathetically uncompetative divisions they arn't p4p.
Bookmarks