Boxing Forums



User Tag List

Thanks Thanks:  0
Likes Likes:  0
Dislikes Dislikes:  0
Page 7 of 8 FirstFirst ... 5678 LastLast
Results 91 to 105 of 106

Thread: Manny Pacquiao is Not on Steroids or PEDS... Plain and Very Simple

Share/Bookmark
  1. #91
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Posts
    321
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    779
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Manny Pacquiao is Not on Steroids or PEDS... Plain and Very Simple

    Quote Originally Posted by hitmanhatton View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by brucelee View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by hitmanhatton View Post


    unlike you i dont have a one track mind and concentrate on just one fighter, i am a boxing fan not a fan of one particualar guy

    you dont reach that level by being scared, the 'most feared' tag is media hype that you obviouslly fall for, risk and reward come in to it, why did pac not fight guzman when he had the chance, why did he pick david diaz over the true lw champ nate campbell...... same thing they didnt bring in enough $$ to justify the risk, its not good for the sport but that is the way it is im afraid
    what chance against guzman are you talking about? guzman was an unknown fighter during that time and Pac was like demolishing legends( Barrera and Morales) then.

    Pac fought 3 to 2 times a year and all of them towards achieving a goal. To win belts in as many divisions as possible.

    nate campbell as the true lw champ? how about Juan Diaz and Casamayor ( The Ring title holder) who were also champions then? I thought Juan was the man during that time. I could remember it well and no one's talking of Campbell as the true lw champ then.

    So again, what chances are you talking about?
    campbell had already beat the #1 Lw in diaz at that point, casamayor was showing blatent signs of being past, and pac picked the weakest champion in that division

    calling guzman an unknown shows a lack of interest in anyone other than pac , guzman called pac out following the barrera rematch, but he instead moved up to fight david diaz...
    Pac picked up the weakest guy because he is testing waters at 135. He is a former 106 pnder for God's sake! And please don't say that david is some puny. Pac is just that good but to say the least david is a strong fighter and a c-class at best. What you should realize is pac went up against a heavier opponent in a championship fight while testing waters at 135.
    And pac afraid of campbell? Lol. It seems you have forgotten what a bum peden did to him. What more if that was pac. Pac toys with nate easily.
    Guzman? Funeka just showed that he can be hurt. And just by jabs? Manny has a lot than jabs to hurt guz. Funeka just exposed how overrated this guy was.
    The moment pac ko'ed cotto, you should'nt bring up guzman, campbell, juan diaz or anybody which pac did'nt faced back then. You should'nt just should'nt. Rule of thumb.

  2. #92
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Posts
    3,640
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1070
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Manny Pacquiao is Not on Steroids or PEDS... Plain and Very Simple

    Quote Originally Posted by mad_takamura View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by hitmanhatton View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by brucelee View Post

    what chance against guzman are you talking about? guzman was an unknown fighter during that time and Pac was like demolishing legends( Barrera and Morales) then.

    Pac fought 3 to 2 times a year and all of them towards achieving a goal. To win belts in as many divisions as possible.

    nate campbell as the true lw champ? how about Juan Diaz and Casamayor ( The Ring title holder) who were also champions then? I thought Juan was the man during that time. I could remember it well and no one's talking of Campbell as the true lw champ then.

    So again, what chances are you talking about?
    campbell had already beat the #1 Lw in diaz at that point, casamayor was showing blatent signs of being past, and pac picked the weakest champion in that division

    calling guzman an unknown shows a lack of interest in anyone other than pac , guzman called pac out following the barrera rematch, but he instead moved up to fight david diaz...
    Pac picked up the weakest guy because he is testing waters at 135. He is a former 106 pnder for God's sake! And please don't say that david is some puny. Pac is just that good but to say the least david is a strong fighter and a c-class at best. What you should realize is pac went up against a heavier opponent in a championship fight while testing waters at 135.
    And pac afraid of campbell? Lol. It seems you have forgotten what a bum peden did to him. What more if that was pac. Pac toys with nate easily.
    Guzman? Funeka just showed that he can be hurt. And just by jabs? Manny has a lot than jabs to hurt guz. Funeka just exposed how overrated this guy was.
    The moment pac ko'ed cotto, you should'nt bring up guzman, campbell, juan diaz or anybody which pac did'nt faced back then. You should'nt just should'nt. Rule of thumb.

    when he was 16 for fuck sake, he is now 30 years old, have you seen how thin he looked at 106 lb?? i love how pac fans go on about him being 106 back in the day but also use weight draining as an excuse for his losses, obviously he wasnt meant to be that weight to start with

  3. #93
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Posts
    19,037
    Mentioned
    21 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1898
    Cool Clicks

    Cool Re: Manny Pacquiao is Not on Steroids or PEDS... Plain and Very Simple

    Quote Originally Posted by hitmanhatton View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by mad_takamura View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by hitmanhatton View Post

    campbell had already beat the #1 Lw in diaz at that point, casamayor was showing blatent signs of being past, and pac picked the weakest champion in that division

    calling guzman an unknown shows a lack of interest in anyone other than pac , guzman called pac out following the barrera rematch, but he instead moved up to fight david diaz...
    Pac picked up the weakest guy because he is testing waters at 135. He is a former 106 pnder for God's sake! And please don't say that david is some puny. Pac is just that good but to say the least david is a strong fighter and a c-class at best. What you should realize is pac went up against a heavier opponent in a championship fight while testing waters at 135.
    And pac afraid of campbell? Lol. It seems you have forgotten what a bum peden did to him. What more if that was pac. Pac toys with nate easily.
    Guzman? Funeka just showed that he can be hurt. And just by jabs? Manny has a lot than jabs to hurt guz. Funeka just exposed how overrated this guy was.
    The moment pac ko'ed cotto, you should'nt bring up guzman, campbell, juan diaz or anybody which pac did'nt faced back then. You should'nt just should'nt. Rule of thumb.

    when he was 16 for fuck sake, he is now 30 years old, have you seen how thin he looked at 106 lb?? i love how pac fans go on about him being 106 back in the day but also use weight draining as an excuse for his losses, obviously he wasnt meant to be that weight to start with

    I was 7lb something when I was born, look how I've grown. I wonder what pac weighed?

  4. #94
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Posts
    321
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    779
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Manny Pacquiao is Not on Steroids or PEDS... Plain and Very Simple

    Quote Originally Posted by hitmanhatton View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by mad_takamura View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by hitmanhatton View Post

    campbell had already beat the #1 Lw in diaz at that point, casamayor was showing blatent signs of being past, and pac picked the weakest champion in that division

    calling guzman an unknown shows a lack of interest in anyone other than pac , guzman called pac out following the barrera rematch, but he instead moved up to fight david diaz...
    Pac picked up the weakest guy because he is testing waters at 135. He is a former 106 pnder for God's sake! And please don't say that david is some puny. Pac is just that good but to say the least david is a strong fighter and a c-class at best. What you should realize is pac went up against a heavier opponent in a championship fight while testing waters at 135.
    And pac afraid of campbell? Lol. It seems you have forgotten what a bum peden did to him. What more if that was pac. Pac toys with nate easily.
    Guzman? Funeka just showed that he can be hurt. And just by jabs? Manny has a lot than jabs to hurt guz. Funeka just exposed how overrated this guy was.
    The moment pac ko'ed cotto, you should'nt bring up guzman, campbell, juan diaz or anybody which pac did'nt faced back then. You should'nt just should'nt. Rule of thumb.

    when he was 16 for fuck sake, he is now 30 years old, have you seen how thin he looked at 106 lb?? i love how pac fans go on about him being 106 back in the day but also use weight draining as an excuse for his losses, obviously he wasnt meant to be that weight to start with
    Find in my post that i was sour graping his loses because he was weight drained. Any post. Don't label me with them. For me pac's losses are inexcusable. I'm not like some pachaters out there, who find every lame excuse for all the opponents pac has beaten.
    Hmmm i wonder who are those hypocrites out there. hmmm..
    Last edited by mad_takamura; 12-26-2009 at 10:50 AM.

  5. #95
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Posts
    31
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    0
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Manny Pacquiao is Not on Steroids or PEDS... Plain and Very Simple

    Quote Originally Posted by Howlin Mad Missy View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by hitmanhatton View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by mad_takamura View Post
    Pac picked up the weakest guy because he is testing waters at 135. He is a former 106 pnder for God's sake! And please don't say that david is some puny. Pac is just that good but to say the least david is a strong fighter and a c-class at best. What you should realize is pac went up against a heavier opponent in a championship fight while testing waters at 135.
    And pac afraid of campbell? Lol. It seems you have forgotten what a bum peden did to him. What more if that was pac. Pac toys with nate easily.
    Guzman? Funeka just showed that he can be hurt. And just by jabs? Manny has a lot than jabs to hurt guz. Funeka just exposed how overrated this guy was.
    The moment pac ko'ed cotto, you should'nt bring up guzman, campbell, juan diaz or anybody which pac did'nt faced back then. You should'nt just should'nt. Rule of thumb.

    when he was 16 for fuck sake, he is now 30 years old, have you seen how thin he looked at 106 lb?? i love how pac fans go on about him being 106 back in the day but also use weight draining as an excuse for his losses, obviously he wasnt meant to be that weight to start with

    I was 7lb something when I was born, look how I've grown. I wonder what pac weighed?
    I thought it was Top Rank and Roach that picked Diaz for Pacquiao since Diaz is also a Top Rank guy. Same as they picked Cotto. They were talking about that fight even before the rematch with Marquez because it was difficult for Pac to make weight at 130. I was hoping he'd fight campbell, but Diaz was a bigger draw.

  6. #96
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Puerto Rico
    Posts
    7,933
    Mentioned
    9 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1283
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Manny Pacquiao is Not on Steroids or PEDS... Plain and Very Simple

    Quote Originally Posted by ER-101 View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Howlin Mad Missy View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by hitmanhatton View Post


    when he was 16 for fuck sake, he is now 30 years old, have you seen how thin he looked at 106 lb?? i love how pac fans go on about him being 106 back in the day but also use weight draining as an excuse for his losses, obviously he wasnt meant to be that weight to start with

    I was 7lb something when I was born, look how I've grown. I wonder what pac weighed?
    I thought it was Top Rank and Roach that picked Diaz for Pacquiao since Diaz is also a Top Rank guy. Same as they picked Cotto. They were talking about that fight even before the rematch with Marquez because it was difficult for Pac to make weight at 130. I was hoping he'd fight campbell, but Diaz was a bigger draw.
    no not really, Campbell had just beaten Juan Diaz, and Casamayor was still the ring and lineal champ, all of those 3 names were/are bigger than David Diaz (especially anywhere outside of Chicago, bet Juan Diaz would even be the crowd favorite there), David Diaz had gotten a gift decision against a shot Morales and barely got by with a draw against a journeyman, Roach and Pacquiao picked David Diaz cause he was the easiest of the bunch and also had a strap, end of

  7. #97
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Posts
    321
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    779
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Manny Pacquiao is Not on Steroids or PEDS... Plain and Very Simple

    Quote Originally Posted by ElTerribleMorales View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by ER-101 View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Howlin Mad Missy View Post


    I was 7lb something when I was born, look how I've grown. I wonder what pac weighed?
    I thought it was Top Rank and Roach that picked Diaz for Pacquiao since Diaz is also a Top Rank guy. Same as they picked Cotto. They were talking about that fight even before the rematch with Marquez because it was difficult for Pac to make weight at 130. I was hoping he'd fight campbell, but Diaz was a bigger draw.
    no not really, Campbell had just beaten Juan Diaz, and Casamayor was still the ring and lineal champ, all of those 3 names were/are bigger than David Diaz (especially anywhere outside of Chicago, bet Juan Diaz would even be the crowd favorite there), David Diaz had gotten a gift decision against a shot Morales and barely got by with a draw against a journeyman, Roach and Pacquiao picked David Diaz cause he was the easiest of the bunch and also had a strap, end of
    That is strategic if you'll tell me. But if you ask me that what if pac chose campbell, juan, or casa..pac would swipe the floor with them. End of.

  8. #98
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Puerto Rico
    Posts
    7,933
    Mentioned
    9 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1283
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Manny Pacquiao is Not on Steroids or PEDS... Plain and Very Simple

    Quote Originally Posted by mad_takamura View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by ElTerribleMorales View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by ER-101 View Post

    I thought it was Top Rank and Roach that picked Diaz for Pacquiao since Diaz is also a Top Rank guy. Same as they picked Cotto. They were talking about that fight even before the rematch with Marquez because it was difficult for Pac to make weight at 130. I was hoping he'd fight campbell, but Diaz was a bigger draw.
    no not really, Campbell had just beaten Juan Diaz, and Casamayor was still the ring and lineal champ, all of those 3 names were/are bigger than David Diaz (especially anywhere outside of Chicago, bet Juan Diaz would even be the crowd favorite there), David Diaz had gotten a gift decision against a shot Morales and barely got by with a draw against a journeyman, Roach and Pacquiao picked David Diaz cause he was the easiest of the bunch and also had a strap, end of
    That is strategic if you'll tell me. But if you ask me that what if pac chose campbell, juan, or casa..pac would swipe the floor with them. End of.
    but he didn't, he didn't have the balls to take on one of the top dogs, or even Marquez for the 3rd time, he tucked ass and ran, just like he's doing now, so much for Mayweather being the runner HAHAHAHAHA

  9. #99
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Posts
    321
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    779
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Manny Pacquiao is Not on Steroids or PEDS... Plain and Very Simple

    Quote Originally Posted by ElTerribleMorales View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by mad_takamura View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by ElTerribleMorales View Post
    no not really, Campbell had just beaten Juan Diaz, and Casamayor was still the ring and lineal champ, all of those 3 names were/are bigger than David Diaz (especially anywhere outside of Chicago, bet Juan Diaz would even be the crowd favorite there), David Diaz had gotten a gift decision against a shot Morales and barely got by with a draw against a journeyman, Roach and Pacquiao picked David Diaz cause he was the easiest of the bunch and also had a strap, end of
    That is strategic if you'll tell me. But if you ask me that what if pac chose campbell, juan, or casa..pac would swipe the floor with them. End of.
    but he didn't, he didn't have the balls to take on one of the top dogs, or even Marquez for the 3rd time, he tucked ass and ran, just like he's doing now, so much for Mayweather being the runner HAHAHAHAHA
    What the. That post needs a little bit of maturing in your part el.
    Why would pac won't have the balls to swipe the floor when there is only one year to test himself as the henry armstrong of this generation. Don't be blind. Read through my sentences and don't let your hatred enbitter you. There are 3 reasons why. Remember timeline is important to get through my point.
    1. Money. High risk high reward.
    2. To redcarpet a pbf showdown by fighting the common opponents and his ducked opponent in your idol cotto.
    3. To capture history by winning 7 belts,( to some 5 ) in different divisions.
    Can pac squeeze a fight with campbell, casa or juan during that year? How long has been in 135? LESS THAN A YEAR. Then you expect pac to squeeze campbell, guz, juan diaz, jmm, on that year alone
    Pac fought david diaz after claiming the sf. belt. against jmm. That was a grueling one. You expect pac to fight juan, casa, or campbell right away after that 2nd fight with jmm? Even if pac would swipe the floor with the fighters you mentioned he ducked, imo, he still has to test waters at 135. A tune up against the 135 wbc champ? Not bad is'nt it?
    After that pac can choose easy pickings from the division. Then an offer he can't refuse came. The right to battle golden spoiled brat hoya. Would you trade a fight against hoya to a fight with campbell, casa, a 3rd fight with jmm, diaz? Now i hear that brain of yours finally working. Or do i have to use symbolism. $$$$$$$$
    That fight was fought on 147 pnds. on that same year.This is the start of the pbf conspiracies. Some of us posters predicted that, as well as taking on hoya, this will be a chance to force pbf out of retirement and stir up anticipation. So the fights against hatton and cotto followed through. Hatton fought with pbf. Cotto was avoided by pbf. All of this are connected to red carpet a showdown of p4p #1 fighters in the world: former and current. (pbf and pac.)
    Where on this timeline of events can you squeeze those fighters pac ducked? Now answer that wise guy.

  10. #100
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Puerto Rico
    Posts
    7,933
    Mentioned
    9 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1283
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Manny Pacquiao is Not on Steroids or PEDS... Plain and Very Simple

    Quote Originally Posted by mad_takamura View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by ElTerribleMorales View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by mad_takamura View Post
    That is strategic if you'll tell me. But if you ask me that what if pac chose campbell, juan, or casa..pac would swipe the floor with them. End of.
    but he didn't, he didn't have the balls to take on one of the top dogs, or even Marquez for the 3rd time, he tucked ass and ran, just like he's doing now, so much for Mayweather being the runner HAHAHAHAHA
    What the. That post needs a little bit of maturing in your part el.
    Why would pac won't have the balls to swipe the floor when there is only one year to test himself as the henry armstrong of this generation. Don't be blind. Read through my sentences and don't let your hatred enbitter you. There are 3 reasons why. Remember timeline is important to get through my point.
    1. Money. High risk high reward.
    2. To redcarpet a pbf showdown by fighting the common opponents and his ducked opponent in your idol cotto.
    3. To capture history by winning 7 belts,( to some 5 ) in different divisions.
    Can pac squeeze a fight with campbell, casa or juan during that year? How long has been in 135? LESS THAN A YEAR. Then you expect pac to squeeze campbell, guz, juan diaz, jmm, on that year alone
    Pac fought david diaz after claiming the sf. belt. against jmm. That was a grueling one. You expect pac to fight juan, casa, or campbell right away after that 2nd fight with jmm? Even if pac would swipe the floor with the fighters you mentioned he ducked, imo, he still has to test waters at 135. A tune up against the 135 wbc champ? Not bad is'nt it?
    After that pac can choose easy pickings from the division. Then an offer he can't refuse came. The right to battle golden spoiled brat hoya. Would you trade a fight against hoya to a fight with campbell, casa, a 3rd fight with jmm, diaz? Now i hear that brain of yours finally working. Or do i have to use symbolism. $$$$$$$$
    That fight was fought on 147 pnds. on that same year.This is the start of the pbf conspiracies. Some of us posters predicted that, as well as taking on hoya, this will be a chance to force pbf out of retirement and stir up anticipation. So the fights against hatton and cotto followed through. Hatton fought with pbf. Cotto was avoided by pbf. All of this are connected to red carpet a showdown of p4p #1 fighters in the world: former and current. (pbf and pac.)
    Where on this timeline of events can you squeeze those fighters pac ducked? Now answer that wise guy.
    don't let your queer eye love (or maybe just lust) for Pacquiao overwhelm you, the guy is holding up the fight, and hell it's not hard to jump divisions if you're juicing lol

  11. #101
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Posts
    321
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    779
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Manny Pacquiao is Not on Steroids or PEDS... Plain and Very Simple

    Quote Originally Posted by ElTerribleMorales View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by mad_takamura View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by ElTerribleMorales View Post
    but he didn't, he didn't have the balls to take on one of the top dogs, or even Marquez for the 3rd time, he tucked ass and ran, just like he's doing now, so much for Mayweather being the runner HAHAHAHAHA
    What the. That post needs a little bit of maturing in your part el.
    Why would pac won't have the balls to swipe the floor when there is only one year to test himself as the henry armstrong of this generation. Don't be blind. Read through my sentences and don't let your hatred enbitter you. There are 3 reasons why. Remember timeline is important to get through my point.
    1. Money. High risk high reward.
    2. To redcarpet a pbf showdown by fighting the common opponents and his ducked opponent in your idol cotto.
    3. To capture history by winning 7 belts,( to some 5 ) in different divisions.
    Can pac squeeze a fight with campbell, casa or juan during that year? How long has been in 135? LESS THAN A YEAR. Then you expect pac to squeeze campbell, guz, juan diaz, jmm, on that year alone
    Pac fought david diaz after claiming the sf. belt. against jmm. That was a grueling one. You expect pac to fight juan, casa, or campbell right away after that 2nd fight with jmm? Even if pac would swipe the floor with the fighters you mentioned he ducked, imo, he still has to test waters at 135. A tune up against the 135 wbc champ? Not bad is'nt it?
    After that pac can choose easy pickings from the division. Then an offer he can't refuse came. The right to battle golden spoiled brat hoya. Would you trade a fight against hoya to a fight with campbell, casa, a 3rd fight with jmm, diaz? Now i hear that brain of yours finally working. Or do i have to use symbolism. $$$$$$$$
    That fight was fought on 147 pnds. on that same year.This is the start of the pbf conspiracies. Some of us posters predicted that, as well as taking on hoya, this will be a chance to force pbf out of retirement and stir up anticipation. So the fights against hatton and cotto followed through. Hatton fought with pbf. Cotto was avoided by pbf. All of this are connected to red carpet a showdown of p4p #1 fighters in the world: former and current. (pbf and pac.)
    Where on this timeline of events can you squeeze those fighters pac ducked? Now answer that wise guy.
    don't let your queer eye love (or maybe just lust) for Pacquiao overwhelm you, the guy is holding up the fight, and hell it's not hard to jump divisions if you're juicing lol
    Jump in to conclusions proves that you wet your pants trying to troll pacfans. You don't actually believe in the phrase: "innocent until proven guilty? " LOL. That just proves that you're that ignorant to the ways of the law. That's easy for you to say but it's not really proven is'nt it? And you didn't answered my question but instead retorted to name calling. How pathetic!
    end.

  12. #102
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Posts
    19,037
    Mentioned
    21 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1898
    Cool Clicks

    Cool Re: Manny Pacquiao is Not on Steroids or PEDS... Plain and Very Simple

    Quote Originally Posted by mad_takamura View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by ElTerribleMorales View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by mad_takamura View Post
    What the. That post needs a little bit of maturing in your part el.
    Why would pac won't have the balls to swipe the floor when there is only one year to test himself as the henry armstrong of this generation. Don't be blind. Read through my sentences and don't let your hatred enbitter you. There are 3 reasons why. Remember timeline is important to get through my point.
    1. Money. High risk high reward.
    2. To redcarpet a pbf showdown by fighting the common opponents and his ducked opponent in your idol cotto.
    3. To capture history by winning 7 belts,( to some 5 ) in different divisions.
    Can pac squeeze a fight with campbell, casa or juan during that year? How long has been in 135? LESS THAN A YEAR. Then you expect pac to squeeze campbell, guz, juan diaz, jmm, on that year alone
    Pac fought david diaz after claiming the sf. belt. against jmm. That was a grueling one. You expect pac to fight juan, casa, or campbell right away after that 2nd fight with jmm? Even if pac would swipe the floor with the fighters you mentioned he ducked, imo, he still has to test waters at 135. A tune up against the 135 wbc champ? Not bad is'nt it?
    After that pac can choose easy pickings from the division. Then an offer he can't refuse came. The right to battle golden spoiled brat hoya. Would you trade a fight against hoya to a fight with campbell, casa, a 3rd fight with jmm, diaz? Now i hear that brain of yours finally working. Or do i have to use symbolism. $$$$$$$$
    That fight was fought on 147 pnds. on that same year.This is the start of the pbf conspiracies. Some of us posters predicted that, as well as taking on hoya, this will be a chance to force pbf out of retirement and stir up anticipation. So the fights against hatton and cotto followed through. Hatton fought with pbf. Cotto was avoided by pbf. All of this are connected to red carpet a showdown of p4p #1 fighters in the world: former and current. (pbf and pac.)
    Where on this timeline of events can you squeeze those fighters pac ducked? Now answer that wise guy.
    don't let your queer eye love (or maybe just lust) for Pacquiao overwhelm you, the guy is holding up the fight, and hell it's not hard to jump divisions if you're juicing lol
    Jump in to conclusions proves that you wet your pants trying to troll pacfans. You don't actually believe in the phrase: "innocent until proven guilty? " LOL. That just proves that you're that ignorant to the ways of the law. That's easy for you to say but it's not really proven is'nt it? And you didn't answered my question but instead retorted to name calling. How pathetic!
    end.

    Please remember that next time you're calling someone predatorhead or whatever it was.

  13. #103
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Posts
    321
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    779
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Manny Pacquiao is Not on Steroids or PEDS... Plain and Very Simple

    Quote Originally Posted by Howlin Mad Missy View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by mad_takamura View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by ElTerribleMorales View Post
    don't let your queer eye love (or maybe just lust) for Pacquiao overwhelm you, the guy is holding up the fight, and hell it's not hard to jump divisions if you're juicing lol
    Jump in to conclusions proves that you wet your pants trying to troll pacfans. You don't actually believe in the phrase: "innocent until proven guilty? " LOL. That just proves that you're that ignorant to the ways of the law. That's easy for you to say but it's not really proven is'nt it? And you didn't answered my question but instead retorted to name calling. How pathetic!
    end.

    Please remember that next time you're calling someone predatorhead or whatever it was.
    He is'nt on this forums is'nt he? Unless you're him secretly pretending you're fat and wear glasses.
    And you guys like to call us pacfans blind nut huggers.

  14. #104
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Montreal/Luxembourg
    Posts
    6,399
    Mentioned
    25 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1009
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Manny Pacquiao is Not on Steroids or PEDS... Plain and Very Simple

    Quote Originally Posted by mad_takamura View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by hitmanhatton View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by mad_takamura View Post
    Pac picked up the weakest guy because he is testing waters at 135. He is a former 106 pnder for God's sake! And please don't say that david is some puny. Pac is just that good but to say the least david is a strong fighter and a c-class at best. What you should realize is pac went up against a heavier opponent in a championship fight while testing waters at 135.
    And pac afraid of campbell? Lol. It seems you have forgotten what a bum peden did to him. What more if that was pac. Pac toys with nate easily.
    Guzman? Funeka just showed that he can be hurt. And just by jabs? Manny has a lot than jabs to hurt guz. Funeka just exposed how overrated this guy was.
    The moment pac ko'ed cotto, you should'nt bring up guzman, campbell, juan diaz or anybody which pac did'nt faced back then. You should'nt just should'nt. Rule of thumb.

    when he was 16 for fuck sake, he is now 30 years old, have you seen how thin he looked at 106 lb?? i love how pac fans go on about him being 106 back in the day but also use weight draining as an excuse for his losses, obviously he wasnt meant to be that weight to start with
    Find in my post that i was sour graping his loses because he was weight drained. Any post. Don't label me with them. For me pac's losses are inexcusable. I'm not like some pachaters out there, who find every lame excuse for all the opponents pac has beaten.
    Hmmm i wonder who are those hypocrites out there. hmmm..
    http://ratonland.org/img/articles/bunny-pancake.gif
    Hidden Content
    That's the way it is, not the way it ends

  15. #105
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Posts
    400
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    786
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Manny Pacquiao is Not on Steroids or PEDS... Plain and Very Simple

    Dont know about anyone else but these posts are starting to get repetitive. Everyones got their own opinion so theres only one way of proving ones honesty and thats to take a simple test and put it to bed. Its not as if hes Jason trying to find a golden fleece or anything. Quick test, bish bash bosh , settled.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

     

Similar Threads

  1. Manny Pac accused of steroids
    By gest12645 in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 72
    Last Post: 11-12-2009, 05:23 PM
  2. Replies: 16
    Last Post: 09-18-2009, 01:57 AM
  3. MANNY PACQUIAO..... NOWHERE TO RUN!!!!!!!!
    By frozensolid_702 in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 49
    Last Post: 10-26-2007, 04:04 AM
  4. Simple question, simple answer....
    By JonesJrMayweather in forum Ask the Trainer
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 04-10-2006, 02:15 PM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  




Boxing | Boxing Photos | Boxing News | Boxing Forum | Boxing Rankings

Copyright © 2000 - 2024 Saddo Boxing - Boxing