This is one of those weird boxing things that I never got. Whenever there is a questionable decision, people go to the Compubox stats to either confirm or dispute a decision.

We all (I hope) understand the concept that boxing is scored round by round, not as a whole. That it's about who wins the most rounds, not who lands the most punches in a fight. But yet we still refer to the overall punch stats for some reason.

Can we all agree to see the error in doing this and give it a rest?

Also this is in no way a "Bradley won" thread. I still haven't seen Pac/Bradley. I just get irked when people use this fallacy.