If I hear "Bad Decisions are Part of Boxing" one more time.....

[Onix]

Looked up "Onix" on Wikipedia. Seems to be an ancient Mexican pagan word for DICK. The picture I hope I uploaded from the site even LOOKS like a dick.
That would explain your personality.

Wow you are seriously on a good one dude. I dont know where the Margarito thing came from but I guess you got back to what you know when you cant think of even new insults.

I do hop you are not in your 30's, it would be embaressing for us grown men.

[TitoFan]

Looked up "Onix" on Wikipedia. Seems to be an ancient Mexican pagan word for DICK. The picture I hope I uploaded from the site even LOOKS like a dick.
That would explain your personality.

Wow you are seriously on a good one dude. I dont know where the Margarito thing came from but I guess you got back to what you know when you cant think of even new insults.

I do hop you are not in your 30's, it would be embaressing for us grown men.

You're the one who came in here without anything constructive to say, asshole. You began the insults without contributing anything useful, as usual. But I think I know why you behave the way you do.

Found this off "wikipedia". And I'm not making this up.



Behavior

They are very hotheaded Pokémon and will constantly attack humans and Pokémon when various objects are caught in its craggy body. However, domesticated Onix will show signs of distress instead of attacking others.
Habitat


Cave Pokémon


Onix can be found in mountains and caves, though they prefer underground tunnels with little light. It can also be found in craggy mountains and abandoned mines. It is most common in Kanto, Johto, and Sinnoh, with some rare appearances in Unova.





So my only question is: Are you a "domesticated" Onix?

[TitoFan]

Look kid... everyone here knows you're a dick. You came into the thread and instead of posting something constructive you began with the insults. Do you have a "man-crush" on me? Doesn't Tony give you enough dick? Seriously, quit stalking my posts for the chance to get into trading insults... and go play in the street, like a good little boy.

[Onix]

Look kid... everyone here knows you're a dick. You came into the thread and instead of posting something constructive you began with the insults. Do you have a "man-crush" on me? Doesn't Tony give you enough dick? Seriously, quit stalking my posts for the chance to get into trading insults... and go play in the street, like a good little boy.

Thats alot of research you did there for my profile name haha. Anyway I dont know what a constructive comment would be to to "if I hear bad decisions blah blah" I figured you just got bored after posting up like 5 threads that all could have been bunched into one thread so I was just going through and giving some validity to your bitching post.

Anyway you do seem genuinely irrate so I guess I'll let you be, funny thing is you never respond to any "legitimate" comment or thread that anyone makes that challenges what you say, you simply start with the belittling and name calling bacause you dont know how to handle real debates.

[TitoFan]

you simply start with the belittling and name calling bacause you dont know how to handle real debates.

No kid.... I save my belittling and name calling for dicks like you.

funny thing is you never respond to any "legitimate" comment or thread that anyone makes that challenges what you say,

bacause you dont know how to handle real debates.

You don't bother to read my posts, so you wouldn't know how I respond to legitimate comments. You simply stalk my posts and begin with your intelligent comments, such as: "So you would huff and puff and blow your straw house down?" A lot of brain power and maturity THAT shows, huh kid? Also, you wouldn't recognize a "real debate" if it up and kicked you in the ass.

Thats alot of research you did there for my profile name haha.

Well... you seem fascinated by fat ass Brian, to the point where I'm beginning to think you have some kind of sick sexual fantasies.... so I thought I'd poke a little fun at your profile name and how it fits your abrasive personality.





You see..... everytime you see me online... you just rush over (I imagine with this little shitty grin on your face)... so you can begin trading insults. And I of course oblige, because I don't believe on putting anybody on "ignore." You think you're bothering me, when in reality I'm just laughing at how moronic you're making yourself look in the process. So I've got no problem doing this. But if it bothers you that I insult you and make you look like the little punk you are, I strongly suggest you stop stalking my posts and start posting your own.

[Beanz]

What was this thread about again? All that I can ascertain is that you have an overactive vomit reflex.

[ElTerribleMorales]

sorry but this thread is a bit ridiculous, we've seen worse decisions and there hasn't been as big of an uproar, where was all this drama when Chisora was ripped off against Helenius (which was just as bad a decision as Bradley/Pacquiao), where was the uproar when Macklin got robbed against Sturm, lets face it if Pacquiao hadn't been involved in the fight there wouldn't be so much drama, the decision was wrong IMO but it's not the worst decision in the history of the sport and there was already a simple solution which Pacquiao already has allegedly turned down which is the rematch, Titofan you get mad that people bring up the Marquez fights and although most see them as close fights, I'd dare say more had Marquez winning at least 2 of the 3 clearly, so to be robbed 2 out of 3 fights (had him winning all 3) is just as tragic as you play up Bradley/Pacquiao, it's not being a hater it's just pointing out clear facts, this uproar and drama about petitions and overturning decisions is just another example of how Pacquiao and even Mayweather get special treatment it's ridiculous

[TitoFan]

sorry but this thread is a bit ridiculous, we've seen worse decisions and there hasn't been as big of an uproar, where was all this drama when Chisora was ripped off against Helenius (which was just as bad a decision as Bradley/Pacquiao), where was the uproar when Macklin got robbed against Sturm, lets face it if Pacquiao hadn't been involved in the fight there wouldn't be so much drama, the decision was wrong IMO but it's not the worst decision in the history of the sport and there was already a simple solution which Pacquiao already has allegedly turned down which is the rematch, Titofan you get mad that people bring up the Marquez fights and although most see them as close fights, I'd dare say more had Marquez winning at least 2 of the 3 clearly, so to be robbed 2 out of 3 fights (had him winning all 3) is just as tragic as you play up Bradley/Pacquiao, it's not being a hater it's just pointing out clear facts, this uproar and drama about petitions and overturning decisions is just another example of how Pacquiao and even Mayweather get special treatment it's ridiculous

(summoning all the patience in my being.....)

For the umpteenth time: I'm not discrediting the Pac-Marquez fights, and people are perfectly within their rights to call them bad decisions as well. I still maintain.... what the FUCK does this have to do with the Pac-Bradley fight?

Number 2, and PLEASE read carefully: The whole premise here (from my point of view, anyway) is not that the decision was bad because Pac came out on the short end. The premise here is that bad decisions are becoming all too commonplace.

It could've been Joe Blow decisioning John Fuck in a bad decision... and at least my outcry would've been just as bad.

It just so happens I finally had enough on this particular fight, and it happens to have been a Pac fight. Feel free (please) to look back through my thousands of previous posts over the years. When the HELL have I ever come across as a "Pactard"?? That's what I thought. Sure, I like Pac as a boxer, and I thoroughly enjoyed his beatings of DLH (where he made him quit whimpering on the stool), Hatton (where he explosively dispelled any talk about Hatton being anywhere NEAR p4p), and Margarito (talk about "karma"...... THAT, my friend, was karma). He TKO'ed Cotto, but what the hell. Cotto wasn't adequately prepared, and it was his own damn fault.

As to WHY the thread....... well maybe I'm just a bit sick and tired of the same old song-and-dance after bad decisions: "Bad decisions are part of the game". Bullshit!! That's the complacent, "let's-sit-on-our-hands-and-do-nothing" point of view. And frankly, I want no part of it.

Do you understand now? Or shall I repeat any part of it?

[Spicoli]

I like the outrage man. Its needed and good to keep it in the spotlight. I dont think that by acknowledging bad and iffy calls are a part of the sport it means we except it and turn the other cheek. Shit promoters, judges etc etc count on just that. It has been around though, for the longest and the danger is that the outcry becomes cliche...almost like a mantra. There are close debatable calls and then there are outright strong arm robberies. I don't know the answer really and honestly do not see a full fool proof system that will leave all in agreement but keeping it 'in the know' is a start. Never ever take a guys written record on face value. Maybe its a sad-twisted thing but I find myself remembering the 'terrible' decisions just as clearly and as often as some of the greatest fights.

[TitoFan]

I like the outrage man. Its needed and good to keep it in the spotlight. I dont think that by acknowledging bad and iffy calls are a part of the sport it means we except it and turn the other cheek. Shit promoters, judges etc etc count on just that. It has been around though, for the longest and the danger is that the outcry becomes cliche...almost like a mantra. There are close debatable calls and then there are outright strong arm robberies. I don't know the answer really and honestly do not see a full fool proof system that will leave all in agreement but keeping it 'in the know' is a start. Never ever take a guys written record on face value. Maybe its a sad-twisted thing but I find myself remembering the 'terrible' decisions just as clearly and as often as some of the greatest fights.

I like to see some of the more serious, veteran posters weighing in on the subject. I hate to have to wade through the fucking riff-raff sometimes.... but on a whole this is a pretty knowledgeable forum that cares about boxing. Like I answered IamInuit... as long as we continue the "hand-wringing" everytime we get slapped in the face by a ridiculous decision (and let's face it... some of us have friends that are marginally into boxing, and are easy to turn away)...... we'll never fix anything. That's why I get so frustrated with the "it's part of boxing mentality". It may be part of boxing now more than ever, but it doesn't have to be. There are MANY things that can be done. Unfortunately, the average "Joe Fan" doesn't have the power to do it. But forums such as this one can serve as a vehicle to try to force change. So as with IamInuit, thanks for your thoughts on the matter and for caring about boxing in general.