Boxing Forums



User Tag List

Thanks Thanks:  0
Likes Likes:  0
Dislikes Dislikes:  0
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 28

Thread: Warren: Froch-Kessler is good, but Froch-Cleverly is better

Share/Bookmark
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Birmingham, UK
    Posts
    6,156
    Mentioned
    15 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1351
    Cool Clicks

    Default Warren: Froch-Kessler is good, but Froch-Cleverly is better

    Froch Will Likely Avoid Cleverly Showdown, Says Warren - Boxing News

    Frank says that he thinks Carl will likely swerve a fight with Cleverly and to take the Kessler shot. Frank is right, shameless ducking by Carl. Froch needs to stop fighting bums and start fighting top contenders. Follow the Cleverly blueprint Carl!!
    Last edited by bzkfn; 12-30-2012 at 07:41 PM.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Sunderland, England
    Posts
    1,705
    Mentioned
    12 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    816
    Cool Clicks

    Default

    As if Warren would put Cleverly in with Froch He needs to fight someone with a pulse first.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Peak District
    Posts
    2,036
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    853
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Warren: Froch-Kessler is good, but Froch-Cleverly is better

    Cleverly definitely needs some column inches, and old frog eyes knows it. If anyones boxing calender ever fizzled out with a squirt at the end it has been Cleverly's this year. Ha.

    2013 will be his year though, he's already putting it right out there against Robert Krasniqi to get the year off to a bang. Start as we mean to go on hey Frank.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    England
    Posts
    5,956
    Mentioned
    49 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    971
    Cool Clicks

    Default

    Why o why has nathan not fought dawson yet? How long is this guy going to be protected and remain undefeated fighting bums.!

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Posts
    64,726
    Mentioned
    1671 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    3025
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Warren: Froch-Kessler is good, but Froch-Cleverly is better

    Blame Warren not Cleverly for this crap, just a cheap way to ride on the publicity that is froch from a rival promoter.
    Do not let success go to your head and do not let failure get to your heart.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Posts
    11,430
    Mentioned
    26 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    2017
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Warren: Froch-Kessler is good, but Froch-Cleverly is better

    Hasn't had him fight a good fighter in his own weight class yet, but a champion in the division BELOW his is 'avoiding him'.

    OK Warren... Sure...

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Posts
    1,603
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    715
    Cool Clicks

    Default

    Typical fish eyes or squid head

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Posts
    64,726
    Mentioned
    1671 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    3025
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Warren: Froch-Kessler is good, but Froch-Cleverly is better

    Cleverly beating Bellow was an underrated victory.
    Do not let success go to your head and do not let failure get to your heart.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Posts
    1,603
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    715
    Cool Clicks

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Master View Post
    Cleverly beating Bellow was an underrated victory.
    Agreed!
    And if it happens again tony would beat him I reckon

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Location
    North Wales
    Posts
    9,844
    Mentioned
    391 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    892
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Warren: Froch-Kessler is good, but Froch-Cleverly is better

    Quote Originally Posted by Dropanuke View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Master View Post
    Cleverly beating Bellow was an underrated victory.
    Agreed!
    And if it happens again tony would beat him I reckon
    In you dream's Tony is the second best Ligh-HW in the country, I like him let him win an other version
    of the Light- HW title, then have a rematch good pay day for each of them, a great fight for the fan's.

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Posts
    9,542
    Mentioned
    86 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    890
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Warren: Froch-Kessler is good, but Froch-Cleverly is better

    clev doesnt really have any massive fight options other than bellew and the time probably isnt right for the rematch

    what else is frank gonna do to try and get a big fight
    Officially the only saddo who has had a girlfriend

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Birmingham, UK
    Posts
    6,156
    Mentioned
    15 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1351
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Warren: Froch-Kessler is good, but Froch-Cleverly is better

    Quote Originally Posted by erics44 View Post
    clev doesnt really have any massive fight options other than bellew and the time probably isnt right for the rematch

    what else is frank gonna do to try and get a big fight
    Dawson, Hopkins, Cloud, Shumanov, Pascal, Campillo? Maybe call out a decent Light-Heavyweight?

    I like Cleverly. He was progressing nicely but his opposition has gotten worse since winning the belt. Frank needs to stop talking and start making decent fights. You can't harp on about Nathan being ready for the best and then sign to fight Tom Karpency. Saying Froch will duck Cleverly though is absolutely laughable. Froch is levels above him, and his opposition is on a higher level than Nathan. Plus Froch will make alot more money elsewhere.

    Why wouldn't time by right for the Bellew rematch? Seriously, what else has he got going on?

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Posts
    40
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    0
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Warren: Froch-Kessler is good, but Froch-Cleverly is better

    Warren's just trying to hype up his boy. Clev needs to step up his competition before challenging someone of Froch's calibre.

    Beating Clev does absolutely nothing for Froch's legacy, but it'll give him a good payday.

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Birmingham, UK
    Posts
    6,156
    Mentioned
    15 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1351
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Warren: Froch-Kessler is good, but Froch-Cleverly is better

    Quote Originally Posted by mightyfighter View Post
    Warren's just trying to hype up his boy. Clev needs to step up his competition before challenging someone of Froch's calibre.

    Beating Clev does absolutely nothing for Froch's legacy, but it'll give him a good payday.
    You're not hyping him well by doing this though. Challenging a fighter out of your fighter's weightclass, and criticising his choise of higher calibre opponent for more money? It is idiocy. He did the same thing with Brook by challenging Khan.

  15. #15
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Posts
    9,542
    Mentioned
    86 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    890
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Warren: Froch-Kessler is good, but Froch-Cleverly is better

    Quote Originally Posted by bzkfn View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by erics44 View Post
    clev doesnt really have any massive fight options other than bellew and the time probably isnt right for the rematch

    what else is frank gonna do to try and get a big fight
    Dawson, Hopkins, Cloud, Shumanov, Pascal, Campillo? Maybe call out a decent Light-Heavyweight?

    I like Cleverly. He was progressing nicely but his opposition has gotten worse since winning the belt. Frank needs to stop talking and start making decent fights. You can't harp on about Nathan being ready for the best and then sign to fight Tom Karpency. Saying Froch will duck Cleverly though is absolutely laughable. Froch is levels above him, and his opposition is on a higher level than Nathan. Plus Froch will make alot more money elsewhere.

    Why wouldn't time by right for the Bellew rematch? Seriously, what else has he got going on?
    he has tried and failed with more than one of those fighters

    clev v froch would generate lots of pounds

    why not try?
    Officially the only saddo who has had a girlfriend

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

     

Similar Threads

  1. Warren on Froch/ Calzaghe and Kessler...
    By THE PHILOSOPHER in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: 12-02-2012, 08:51 PM
  2. Replies: 22
    Last Post: 09-05-2012, 06:11 PM
  3. Froch talks Bute,Ward & why he wont fight Cleverly
    By porkypara in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 03-21-2012, 03:40 PM
  4. Froch vs Miranda/lacy or maybe cleverly?
    By Dropanuke in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 20
    Last Post: 03-28-2011, 03:46 PM
  5. Replies: 23
    Last Post: 05-12-2009, 08:41 AM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  




Boxing | Boxing Photos | Boxing News | Boxing Forum | Boxing Rankings

Copyright © 2000 - 2024 Saddo Boxing - Boxing