Every Bernard Hopkins win adds to the legacy of Joe Calzaghe

**Freedom** · 04-20-2014 04:47 PM

www.twitter.com/RealJoeCalzaghe

Joe Calzaghe@RealJoeCalzaghe
With Bhop unifying world titles at 49 does that mean I beat him at his peak?!

**mrbig1** · 04-20-2014 05:18 PM

I watch the fight again and again. No way Hopkins won that fight. Bhop beat everybody before and after the Calzaghe fight. So yes it does add to his legacy. It just shows how good Joe was. Hopkins is a great fighter no doubt, but he is also the biggest cry baby bitch in boxing.

**palmerq** · 04-20-2014 11:39 PM

Originally Posted by mrbig1

I watch the fight again and again. No way Hopkins won that fight. Bhop beat everybody before and after the Calzaghe fight. So yes it does add to his legacy. It just shows how good Joe was. Hopkins is a great fighter no doubt, but he is also the biggest cry baby bitch in boxing.

I only watched it once but I agree I dont see how hopkins won it.. it was pretty close but i think you would have to do some creative scoring to have bernard winning..

Although I thought b-hop was better in the first half of the fight and started to fade , I think if he was a couple of years younger(strange saying that based on what he is doing now :S) he would have won it .. Two pretty evenly matched guys I think , b-hop has ended up with the better career in my opinion .

**DannyV297** · 04-21-2014 12:29 AM

Originally Posted by Max Power

He did beat him though. You can't change that!

Refusing a rematch is not as serious as ducking a fight altogether. Otherwise you'd have to call into question many great boxers who did the same thing.

Calzaghe was awesome! I don't think he's underrated at all. There will always be detractors though.

He beat him. And I'm glad he beat him. If people don't like it, hahahahahaha. Fck em