She had it 114-114 in the Loma-Russell fight. WTF!!!!!!!!
C.J. Ross is a retired boxing judge who drew criticism for a series of questionable fighting decisions in high profile matchups, including Mayweather vs Canelo and Pacquiao vs Bradley.
She had it 114-114 in the Loma-Russell fight. WTF!!!!!!!!
C.J. Ross is a retired boxing judge who drew criticism for a series of questionable fighting decisions in high profile matchups, including Mayweather vs Canelo and Pacquiao vs Bradley.
“If you want loyalty, buy a dog.” Ricky Hatton
It takes drowning nearly to death as an infant and suffering severe brain damage to be as bad as C.J. Ross. That bitch is either blind or she was tied in with some nasty sort of fellas.
114 - 114 was a disgrace and quite frankly it pushes womens involvement in sport back by years
Excuse my spelling Hidden Content
This is why women should not be involved in judging boxing matches, figure skating yes, boxing no.
There are male judges equally as bad as these women. Theres also a shitload of men on this forum who cannot score a fight for their lives, so it is not a sex thing. I do think judges should have some experience with boxing (eg former boxer/trainer etc themselves before they can even apply to become a judge. Im pretty sure CJ Ross had none.
Well.. from one decision I can't say yes or no, but Checking boxrec, she has a history of these kind of decisions. Scoring the fights closer than the other 2 judges in most of her fights. With the benefit of her husband's experience, she should definitely not be making these kind of gaffes.
Good Read on Chuck:Judge Emeritus Chuck Giampa: You can't have robots deciding who wins fights - National Boxing | Examiner.com
One thing I will say is it seems more and more common now for that one judge to go the other way, when you have a tough exciting fight. I dont know if: a.)they're paid for their vote and follow through no matter what the result so they can be approached again on another fight. b.)Are trying to keep the young names alive for the future of boxing or c.) trying to keep a shred of doubt there to justify rematch possibilities. Its probably none of the three or it could be all of the 3.
The more common explanation. She bit on the flashy shoe-shining by Russell, which had my thinking my TV was off or something when he exhaled like 6 times and threw 3 punches in those flurries.
They want your @$$ beat because upsets make news. News brings about excitement, excitement brings about ratings. The objective is to bring you up to the tower and tear your @$$ down. And if you don't believe that, you're crazy.
Roy Jones, Jr. "What I've Learned," Esquire 2003
C.J. Ross is the Mt. Everest of boxing incompetence. But she's not entirely to be blamed for the Mayweather-Canelo scoring. Rumor has it she had been fondling herself to Canelo posters leading up to the fight, compounding that by consuming several pints of hard liquour before the fight, and finally... accidentally blinding herself in the ladies' room while applying her mascara and getting bumped from behind.
Besides... I'm sure she was paid handsomely before the fight by Canelo's cartel/ hype machine to make sure she did her damned best to give the fight to Canelo.
Can you imagine what difference what be made if every shitty judge without tits received as much scrutiny and calling out
New rule, every crap judge without tits well, is a tit. Remember them and make threads about them
Now, now my friend. The brush you are using here seems as large or larger in its stroke then the one actually being used in the complaint. Not every criticism of a women is sexist. Scientifically speaking there are both physical and cerebral differences between men and women. Our brains are wired differently.
Equality is a nice concept and also physically and mentally impossible. Its my contention that women are terrible boxing judges and also that there is nothing they can do about it. Of course there are exceptions. There are simply things that one does better then the other and judging a boxing match is one of them. I also think about 10 different disciplines in Science would have my back on that. Nothing to do with vaginas and dicks.
Its most likely a brain function because women use both sides of the brain for many of the same functions men reserve a spot for. A product of evolution I suppose. I routinely call out hack judges and they are most definitely men as a rule but that's just based on the basic math.
Men dwarf women in the scum bag judge category and men are much more likely to be bought for their incompetence whereas women are simply not capable of the fixation needed. I think thats exactly what happened to Williams based on her own testimony. Its like she was guessing and it came ought a draw. I don't think a blank card has every been handed in. Can you imagine? Handing in 12 blank round cards to the official score keeper lol. Some of these Vegas good ole boys and production affiliated judges are probably handed job expectation memos once every 6 months.
I had to clarify because things can be taken and placed out of context. And ftr, overall I believe women are superior to men largely because they are more in touch with their emotions and I believe their brains have evolved more. Its not hard to predict a time when we are nothing but sperm producers. And I bet they still wont be able to judge a boxing match
The fact remains and is non-controvertible that Ross, Williams, and now Giampa have been inducted into the Blind Judges Hall of Shame (located in Texas) along with Gale Van Hoy, Duane Ford, Roger Tilleman, Pierluigi Poppi, Mikael Hook, Guillermo Perez, Calvin Claxon, Lawrence Layton, Ron McNair, Frank Lombardi an d many others.
“If you want loyalty, buy a dog.” Ricky Hatton
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks