Firstly, I don't see why your opinion of BJS is so much higher just because he beat the Superhero that is Eubank jr. surely he should've won ? he was a possible World title contender and Eubank was a relative novice albeit a good one. Both of them are exactly what they say on the tin....
Saunders- technically good Boxer looking for a World title shot. Whether he belongs at that level , we'll find out.
Eubank - a very good novice with massive "potential", but still a bit raw, a bit wild and a bit arrogant. He COULD go a long way, but he'll need to listen now and again, and if he doesn't , he's going nowhere.
Finally, this has lead you to think that fights with Soliman and Geale are "easily winnable". Forget about Mundine, because his last fight was at LMW And he's nearly 40, But Geale and Soliman have both been World Champions and fought the best.
At the moment, that is something BJS and Eu have no guarantees of doing. Geale was Half a second from KO'ing Darren Barker and I think your comment is grossly disrespectful to both of them.
I suppose it's typical of many English people's perception that the World begins in Cornwall and ends in Carlisle.
Im not English or from the UK...
No, you live in the Channel Islands, which isn't far off, you can take your pick. That's probably why you have the Union Jack in your ID. I don't see the tricoloure in there.and you, putting it kindly wax lyrical about 2 Brit fighters to the point of Blind faith.
I think that justifies my comment.
I'm not going to look through all your Jingoistic posts, but I think it's unrealistic to cling onto the thought that Eubank won just because "one judge said so" and "the gypsy stood next to me said so!" Get over it .
It's also unrealistic to say that Fury beats nearly every HW in the division "easily". You use the fact that Lucas Browne hasn't beaten anyone of note to make your opinion of him. That's fair enough, but by the same context, who the fuck has Fury beat apart from a feather fisted CW that decked him before he leant all over him for 8 rounds?
I've said before I like Fury, but keep it real and even if he beats most HW's in the division it's unrealistic to think that it will be easy.
I dont think Eubank won just because a judge said so and people in the crowd also thought so. I used those as examples to prove how its not ridiculous for anyone to think Eubank won.
I based my opinion on what I saw and from my experience as an actual boxer and judge.
What do you base your opinion on?
Sometimes in the arena, you can get a distorted view of how the fight is going, so I watched it very carefully twice over, first time with no volume. And to be honest I think Saunders was spot on. He won the first six rounds and won 2 out of the next 6. That means he won the fight comfortably by 4 rounds. Eubank wasn't helped by his Dad posing in front of him in the corner, and the only reason he started slowly was that he couldn't suss out what to do to combat Saunders tactics, and he refuses to allow Davis to talk or listen when he does. That is the biggest fuckin joke in the World.
Saunders didn't win all the first 6 at all. There was a couple of rounds minimum in the first half Eubank won. My view was not distorted. As an ex judge I'm looking at the work both produce and not the overall impression by any one fighter. As an amateur judge its difficult to watch or enjoy a fight as you are counting both fighters punches at the same time and you learn how to do it proficiently. Although pro isn't scored like amateur on number of punches landed solely if you land more punches than your opponent generally you are going to win the round, unless your not putting any effort or steam on those punches.
Well, it's all about opinions I suppose, and no disrespect to you being an ex Judge, but I've seen judges give poor decisions as you have seen also no doubt.I'm not putting you in that bracket, just saying.
Nonetheless , I notice you never answered my remarks about Fury's experience or Eubank's arrogance, so I'll take it you concede and agree on those points.
I didnt notice any comments about experience or arrogance.
If you are saying Tyson is not experienced enough thats not entirely his own fault. David Haye pulled out twice, he tried making a replacement fight with Wilder, that didnt come off and then Chisor pulled out and his trainer pulled him out of the replacement because his trainers brother was dying.
As for arrogance, so what? Its only arrogance. Its not the ignorance that spouts out of Saunders mouth. You know Tyson Fury got fined for saying lesser things than saunders did but its terrible that a boxer should believe in himself?
Whats the most terrbile thing that Eubank Jr has said that someone could take offence at?
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks