Amir Khan and Kell Brook are better welterweights than Floyd Mayweather and Manny Pacquiao, says Paulie Malignaggi | Boxing News | Sky Sports
'Mayweather and Pacquiao are the biggest names but I think here we are in 2015, Kell Brook, Keith Thurman and Amir Khan are the best three welterweights in the world'
Is he saying that those three can beat may and pac? Or does he mean once Mayweather and Pac have gone and has been misquoted?
I usually like Malignaggi and he is a good boxing analyst but I seriously disagree with him there.
I personally think Pac steam rolls all three and Mayweather boxes their ears off. Khan is chinny, Brook is too slow and Thurman makes mistakes that he would seriously pay for against May or Pac.
Maybe he's right and I'm just being like my dad (who thinks modern fighters don't stand a chance against the old timers who he watched growing up) can't accept my immortal heroes are mere mortals. Maybe I have that syndrome for Mayweather and Pacquiao as the two fighters from my era who I will see as unbeatable in hypothetical match-ups against any future WWs. Sat in my armchair 'I watched Mayweather and Pacquiao, these young kids wouldn't stand a chance'.
I started this thread wanting to have a go at Paulie but I got a little sentimental . To hell with it, you guys are weird as fuck on here anyway, so I have no need to be embarrassed about my sentimentality.
Anyways, share your opinions on Malignaggi's statement.
Bookmarks