Boxing Forums



User Tag List

Thanks Thanks:  0
Likes Likes:  0
Dislikes Dislikes:  0
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 20

Thread: Rios/Bradley set to go ahead

Share/Bookmark
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    The Edge Of Nowhere
    Posts
    24,896
    Mentioned
    946 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1315
    Cool Clicks

    Default Rios/Bradley set to go ahead

    Timothy Bradley will defend his WBO World welterweight title on Nov. 7 at the Thomas & Mack Center in Las Vegas against former lightweight champion Brandon Rios.The fight will be televised on regular HBO.
    For Bradley, his first step is to find a new trainer.
    Boxers and trainers split up all the time, but when we are speaking about competition at the world-class level, that’s a rarity. Earlier this week, the once dynamic duo of Timothy Bradley and Joel Diaz called it quits.
    Legendary trainer Teddy Atlas and highly-respected trainer Buddy McGirt are possible replacements according to ESPN’s Dan Rafael.
    Not only was Diaz caught off guard, but he found Bradley’s actions to be selfish. He spoke exclusively with Fight Hype’s Luis Sandoval and when the topic of Teddy Atlas came up as a possible replacement, Diaz let it loose.
    “It’s not going to work. In order for anybody to work with Bradley, they need to adapt to every single person around Bradley,” he explained.
    Diaz explained that Bradley allowed too many people to have an influence on his decision making, and it became difficult to even access his fighter just to do simple things, like checking up on his fighter, because there were so many people Diaz had to get through.
    If Diaz’s speech holds true, does a Teddy Atlas or a Buddy McGirt sound like a couple of guys that would be able to adapt to the hazardous environment that Diaz described?
    Would any professional trainer be able to succeed in that type of environment for that matter?
    Distractions or not, we’re in for a good fight according to Top Rank President, Todd duBoef.
    “We think we have a terrific fight,” said duBoef via Las Vegas-Review Journal. “These guys are perfect for each other. They are action fighters who like to come forward, and it’s probably the best non-pay-per-view fight out there.”
    Bradley’s wife and manager, Monica, finalized the deal for the Rios fight in conjunction with duBoef.
    “We’ve been working on this for quite a while, and we’re glad to have it done,” duBoef said. “This is a fight that both Tim and Brandon wanted, and I’m pleased we were able to bring it to Las Vegas.”
    Rios was in line for a shot at the IBF title against Kell Brook this summer, but when Eddie Hearn, Brook’s promoter at Matchroom Sport, demanded a rematch clause, negotiations fell through.
    Rios is coming off a third-round stoppage of a shot and totally unprepared Mike Alvarado in a trilogy match this past January while Bradley is coming off a unanimous decision victory over Jessie Vargas to claim what was initially the interim WBO welterweight belt before Floyd Mayweather was stripped of the world title.
    Bradley will have to clear his head, move on, and prepare for a fight which is just over two months away.
    Bradley-Rios will be the first boxing match in the newly-renovated Thomas & Mack Center, which is in the process of a $72 million renovation.
    Ironically, the last time the venue hosted boxing was in October 2013 when Bradley defeated Mexican legend Juan Manuel Marquez by split decision to defend his WBO World welterweight belt for the second time.
    “We’re excited about being the first boxing event in the new Thomas & Mack,” duBoef said. “We’ve had many great fights in that building over the years, and this will be right up there with the best of them. It’s a great way to help close out what’s been a great year for boxing.”


    Bradley-Rios officially on Nov. 7 in Las Vegas | Tha Boxing Voice


    Hidden Content

    "I am always doing that which I can not do, in order that I may learn how to do it."

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Posts
    4,605
    Mentioned
    38 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    617
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Rios/Bradley set to go ahead

    Rios is damaged goods and Bradley will box circles around him. You need to put Rios in with someone who is going to come forward. At least he will make an exciting fight.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Sep 2013
    Posts
    5,063
    Mentioned
    74 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    627
    Cool Clicks

    Default

    The piece was slightly incomplete. The problem wasn't that they wanted a rematch clause. It was that they wanted a rematch also in the UK for basically the same split. The first 2 could have been sorted out. I hate Rios and I agree with him that the 3rd detail is offensive.

    As for the fight. Rios is used up, but Bradley hasn't looked good for a while either. If Bradley boxes he wins EASILY, if he gets into a fight he should still be able to beat Rios to the punch but who knows.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Posts
    64,724
    Mentioned
    1670 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    3024
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Rios/Bradley set to go ahead

    Bradley just has to box but he can get too excited and end up in a war. If he does Tim could be in trouble.
    Do not let success go to your head and do not let failure get to your heart.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Sep 2013
    Posts
    5,063
    Mentioned
    74 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    627
    Cool Clicks

    Default

    Let's just hope Rios has the discipline to not enter the ring with a muffintop like he did against Emanuel.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Posts
    946
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    764
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Rios/Bradley set to go ahead

    I think rios can beat Bradley if he can get him to trade Bradley has no power and rios although very limited in him boxing iq is one tough bastard

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Posts
    9,794
    Mentioned
    21 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1351
    Cool Clicks

    Default

    Berto vs Ortiz all over again?

    Maybe.

    That or as others have said, Bradley just boxes his ears off.

    I see both men getting hit a lot though. Two iron wills going at it.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    This Lunatic Asylum
    Posts
    23,278
    Mentioned
    428 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    3060
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Rios/Bradley set to go ahead

    Quote Originally Posted by Ron Swanson View Post
    The piece was slightly incomplete. The problem wasn't that they wanted a rematch clause. It was that they wanted a rematch also in the UK for basically the same split. The first 2 could have been sorted out. I hate Rios and I agree with him that the 3rd detail is offensive.
    Rubbish. How could you possibly know what the split was let alone the details of the negotiations?

    Feel free to provide some evidence.
    3-Time SADDO PREDICTION COMP CHAMPION.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Posts
    683
    Mentioned
    3 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    552
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Rios/Bradley set to go ahead

    Bradley has been in some exciting fights but I don't think he'll get sucked into a brawl with Rios. After the scare against Vargas; Bradley will remain focused and will stick to the game plan.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Sep 2013
    Posts
    5,063
    Mentioned
    74 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    627
    Cool Clicks

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Fenster View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Ron Swanson View Post
    The piece was slightly incomplete. The problem wasn't that they wanted a rematch clause. It was that they wanted a rematch also in the UK for basically the same split. The first 2 could have been sorted out. I hate Rios and I agree with him that the 3rd detail is offensive.
    Rubbish. How could you possibly know what the split was let alone the details of the negotiations?

    Feel free to provide some evidence.
    You said rubbish, prove me wrong. Prove it is rubbish. You not being privy to the facts doesn't make it untrue. You supply any evidence it is rubbish and I will supply piece after piece stating they wanted basically the same split in a rematch. Back up your talk and I'll gladly back up mine. I'll give you 12 hours, mine will only take minutes

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    This Lunatic Asylum
    Posts
    23,278
    Mentioned
    428 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    3060
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Rios/Bradley set to go ahead

    Quote Originally Posted by Ron Swanson View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Fenster View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Ron Swanson View Post
    The piece was slightly incomplete. The problem wasn't that they wanted a rematch clause. It was that they wanted a rematch also in the UK for basically the same split. The first 2 could have been sorted out. I hate Rios and I agree with him that the 3rd detail is offensive.
    Rubbish. How could you possibly know what the split was let alone the details of the negotiations?

    Feel free to provide some evidence.
    You said rubbish, prove me wrong. Prove it is rubbish. You not being privy to the facts doesn't make it untrue. You supply any evidence it is rubbish and I will supply piece after piece stating they wanted basically the same split in a rematch. Back up your talk and I'll gladly back up mine. I'll give you 12 hours, mine will only take minutes
    You want me to produce evidence that you're talking rubbish? The onus is on you to back up what you have claimed. I have not claimed to know anything. I will apologise if you provide evidence of the money/split and the intricacies of the contract that fell apart.

    Once again - please feel free to provide evidence (especially as it will only take minutes).
    3-Time SADDO PREDICTION COMP CHAMPION.

  12. #12
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Paradise
    Posts
    26,091
    Mentioned
    530 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1951
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Rios/Bradley set to go ahead

    What I'd like:

    Bradley by highlight reel, devastating, embarrassing KTFO.

    What'll happen:

    Bradley by wide UD, having boxed Brandon's ears off.

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Posts
    64,724
    Mentioned
    1670 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    3024
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Rios/Bradley set to go ahead

    Quote Originally Posted by TitoFan View Post
    What I'd like:

    Bradley by highlight reel, devastating, embarrassing KTFO.

    What'll happen:

    Bradley by wide UD, having boxed Brandon's ears off.
    Bradley does not have the power to knockout anyone.
    Do not let success go to your head and do not let failure get to your heart.

  14. #14
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Paradise
    Posts
    26,091
    Mentioned
    530 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1951
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Rios/Bradley set to go ahead

    Quote Originally Posted by Master View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by TitoFan View Post
    What I'd like:

    Bradley by highlight reel, devastating, embarrassing KTFO.

    What'll happen:

    Bradley by wide UD, having boxed Brandon's ears off.
    Bradley does not have the power to knockout anyone.


    (sigh)

    Unfortunately, you're quite right. Much less that 6-inch thick skull of Rios.

  15. #15
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    On the levee
    Posts
    45,714
    Mentioned
    428 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    5040
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Rios/Bradley set to go ahead

    Based on styles and wondering if Bradley's chin has began to crack, I think this is a pick em honestly. Don't get me wrong Rios is one slugfest away from needing to use flash cards for conversations but he'll come very physical and sloppy dangerous on a guy he'll surely outweigh and refuses to listen to people smarter than he. I've never bought in that Bradley was some full on boxer simply choosing to brawl. Some of those choices were made for him and over the last few fights he's been leaving himself in bad exposed lurches. Tough gritty fight for both I think

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

     

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 12
    Last Post: 08-04-2015, 12:49 AM
  2. Replies: 25
    Last Post: 01-03-2014, 05:46 PM
  3. Marquez wants Bradley as 2nd option.. Bradley accepts!
    By FinitoElDinamita in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 35
    Last Post: 06-23-2012, 03:06 PM
  4. pac vs. pbf....thinking ahead
    By happytrip in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 45
    Last Post: 11-15-2009, 05:21 AM
  5. Cotto looking ahead...???
    By KananKrus in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 19
    Last Post: 08-13-2009, 12:25 PM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  




Boxing | Boxing Photos | Boxing News | Boxing Forum | Boxing Rankings

Copyright © 2000 - 2024 Saddo Boxing - Boxing