Yes that is another form of fascism. Yet it dresses itself up as some kind of altruistic savior and protector of the world against fascism. It is rather tricky and sneaky and has a couple of layers of camouflage but it is one and the same.
Yes that is another form of fascism. Yet it dresses itself up as some kind of altruistic savior and protector of the world against fascism. It is rather tricky and sneaky and has a couple of layers of camouflage but it is one and the same.
Yes It is. If someone can't @name call Oswald Mosley without being called a facist, then the person demanding everyone agree with them is a facist.
There is lack of clarification in what exactly is a fascist. So it is unlikely that it is fascist to label someone a fascist if they are not.
Your views are very uncomfortable to some Brockton, and they could be described as to the right of the political spectrum, anti-liberal, anti-conservative and anti-establishment so thus some may conclude you are a fascist...
Personally I am on the fence, I think you use such extreme views to show off and create debate, which you are good at.
"Boxing is like jazz. The better it is, the less people appreciate it."
George Foreman
I think you are a classic facist Brit Kid for expecting some gold standard explanation of everything including what constitutes being a facist.
I don't think Brockton or @Reg/Miles/Gaydalph/Oswald is either...much but concluding that one can not invoke Blackshirt backers in response to immediate calls for backup from yes men in silly threads about continents you are not even living on is a bit facist like.
I am not much of a fascist, but you don't need to be living in Europe to see that political correctness, neo liberalism, and refugees are sinking the ship. In Europe you get labelled a Nazi for pointing out these things and that in itself is the fascism. I have a friend living in Brussels who isn't happy about the place at all. It doesn't matter where you are as long as the thought process makes sense. The left is what I like but unfortunately the left has become warped with unrealistic analysis of the situation.
an authoritarian and nationalistic right-wing system of government and social organization.Those are the kinds of definitions you get for the term.One makes you think the person has to be right of some political circle.They are both so broad and so narrow that they almost become meaningless and they are anchored by how its applied. Its open season. If the bureaucrats are in uniforms the leaders a fascist. Its a label for everything and nothing. From religion to ones boss to the Editor of a newspaper. Its just a word and there is really nothing finite about it.a political philosophy, movement, or regime (as that of the Fascisti) that exalts nation and often race above the individual and that stands for a centralized autocratic government headed by a dictatorial leader, severe economic and social regimentation, and forcible suppression of opposition
I've seen some labeled fascist simply for a name or in even more fucktardish instances, the color of a name Sometimes if one finds labels necessary you're not necessarily a fascist, ya could just be a blooming arsehole
Its part of my job, I teach controversial topic IELTS writing workshops. We need to analyze our views and question ourselves often/reassess the basis for our often unexamined precepts.
Its healthy debate. So is examining why people would feel so extremely uncomfortable being frank about controversial topics. Things should be objectively discussed. References to fascists are thinly-veiled and superficial knee-jerk reactions to "shame" the opposing view, and must be called-out for its underhandedness.
Yet I love Beans and have nothing personal against him, for the record, lest misunderstandings get afoot.
It's a ridiculous over reaction. Two words.@name calling a dead man and the defenders of liberty have a melt down. Jeez
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks