Originally Posted by
mikeeod
One of the oldest adages in the sport of boxing is that a challenger must take the championship away from the champion. Unfortunately, however, this isn't always the case and fans are left with feelings of regret and frustration after underwhelming title changes. My top 4 worst/most underwhelming title changes are:
1. Bernard Hopkins vs. Jermaine Taylor: BHOP was making his record 21st defense of the unified title but had started to slow down and show "slippage" while Taylor was the heir apparent to the crown and the HBO favorite/future Golden Boy. Bernard was economical during the first half, which meant he threw minimal punches while attempting to focus mostly on defense with the hope that Taylor, like all of Hop's previous opponents, would burn out in the late rounds. Jermaine fought well early, mostly through sheer aggression, prior to becoming exhausted and struggling late in the fight. whether you feel that Taylor deserved the disputed decision or not (I didn't), you have to admit that this was a pathetic way for a great, proud, and historical champion like BHOP to lose his coveted middleweight crown.
2. Marvin Hagler vs. Sugar Ray Leonard: Like Hopkins, Marvelous Marvin Hagler was a dominant and proud champion who took great pride in his championship and in ruling his division. Hagler also had a great disdain for Leonard, who he perceived as having been given fame and fortune easily while Hagler had to fight and scrap for every cent he had. This fight was much better than Hop vs. Taylor, with much more sustained action, but did follow a similar theme: Hagler giving away the first four rounds before coming on late to batter an exhausted Leonard. Leonard stuck to a strategy of focusing his efforts on the final 30 seconds of each round, with the hope of "stealing" these rounds from the judges. I can see a case for some fans feeling this was a great changing of the guard/championships due to Leonard being such a large underdog as well as its historical value. As entertaining as the fight was and despite its historical value, Marvelous Marvin Hagler deserved to have the title beaten away from him (if he was to lose it), not have his top rival/enemy "steal" his prized title by working the crowd and judges.
3. Oliver McCall vs. Frank Bruno: Historically a great fight since big Frank FINALLY won his championship, but one of the worst heavyweight fights ever in terms of sustained action in the ring. Bruno started very quickly but, as usually happened with Bruno, he tired out by the mid rounds and went into defense/survival mode. Luckily for Bruno, McCall was equally pathetic, refusing to throw any punches until the 9th round, and never mounting a committed or consistent attack against an extremely vulnerable opponent.
4. Michael Moorer vs. Evander Holyfield: Evander was coming off of his title winning performance in the Bowe rematch and was known as boxing's "Holy Warrior". Moorer, meanwhile, was an undefeated southpaw who had a vicious punch and a reputation for being the meanest fighter in business, albeit a vulnerable one who had a less than reliable chin (as shown in his fight vs. Bert Cooper). This fight started out well, with Evander coming out fast and scoring an early knockdown while Moorer attempted to fight a tactical fight behind a sharp right jab. Things changed dramatically in the mid rounds when, depending on who you believe, Evander had a heart issue or reaction to preflight medication. The fight turned out to be extremely dull with an obviously distraught Evander unable to mount sustained attacks and a reluctant Moorer doing the bare minimum to win a majority decision.
Anyone have additional fights I missed?
Bookmarks