Today in Trump

[walrus]

Walrus is right. Should and could and would and May and Might are called modals, sometimes known as conditionals, depending on which grammar one consults.

Conditionals are used in unreal situations, for example: he could have gotten the job if he had not forgotten to shake the interviewer's hand.

In reality he did not get the job but he simply could have gotten the job IF HE HAD SHAKEN THE INTERVIEWERS HAND. The same goes with the word should which is also a modal or a conditional depending on which grammatical terminology you prefer

Now in the United States treason is punishable by Death. That is definitely the law. There is ample evidence to support that Obama has committed treason on many levels. At no time did I say that someone should not be tried in a court of law by a jury of his or her peers. Now in the strictly conditional sense using the modal should, I think it is quite fair to say that conditionally if a person commits treason then they should AS PRESCRIBED BY US LAW be lynched or if you prefer the modern sense lethally injected I think that is the most modern method being used nowadays as the electric chair may only still be used in Alabama I believe.

A terroristic threat is defined by it's clear personal and willful intent or threat. For example if a person says that he is definitely going to hunt someone down and kill them then that is a terroristic threat.

@walrus has correctly nailed the grammatical differential on this topic.

Thank you. I forgot all those proper usage things, I reverse my ban suggestion.

[Spicoli]

Walrus is right. Should and could and would and May and Might are called modals, sometimes known as conditionals, depending on which grammar one consults.

Conditionals are used in unreal situations, for example: he could have gotten the job if he had not forgotten to shake the interviewer's hand.

In reality he did not get the job but he simply could have gotten the job IF HE HAD SHAKEN THE INTERVIEWERS HAND. The same goes with the word should which is also a modal or a conditional depending on which grammatical terminology you prefer

Now in the United States treason is punishable by Death. That is definitely the law. There is ample evidence to support that Obama has committed treason on many levels. At no time did I say that someone should not be tried in a court of law by a jury of his or her peers. Now in the strictly conditional sense using the modal should, I think it is quite fair to say that conditionally if a person commits treason then they should AS PRESCRIBED BY US LAW be lynched or if you prefer the modern sense lethally injected I think that is the most modern method being used nowadays as the electric chair may only still be used in Alabama I believe.

A terroristic threat is defined by it's clear personal and willful intent or threat. For example if a person says that he is definitely going to hunt someone down and kill them then that is a terroristic threat.

@walrus has correctly nailed the grammatical differential on this topic.

If you'd like to chase it around a tree, have at it. I'm talking here and I'll keep it simple for you..don't call for or half ass suggest or rally round a lynching. Of anyone. Good? Thanks.

[Gandalf]

I always use should and could. My lawyer tells me it is my get out clause.

[Gandalf]

Walrus is right. Should and could and would and May and Might are called modals, sometimes known as conditionals, depending on which grammar one consults.

Conditionals are used in unreal situations, for example: he could have gotten the job if he had not forgotten to shake the interviewer's hand.

In reality he did not get the job but he simply could have gotten the job IF HE HAD SHAKEN THE INTERVIEWERS HAND. The same goes with the word should which is also a modal or a conditional depending on which grammatical terminology you prefer

Now in the United States treason is punishable by Death. That is definitely the law. There is ample evidence to support that Obama has committed treason on many levels. At no time did I say that someone should not be tried in a court of law by a jury of his or her peers. Now in the strictly conditional sense using the modal should, I think it is quite fair to say that conditionally if a person commits treason then they should AS PRESCRIBED BY US LAW be lynched or if you prefer the modern sense lethally injected I think that is the most modern method being used nowadays as the electric chair may only still be used in Alabama I believe.

A terroristic threat is defined by it's clear personal and willful intent or threat. For example if a person says that he is definitely going to hunt someone down and kill them then that is a terroristic threat.

@walrus has correctly nailed the grammatical differential on this topic.

If you'd like to chase it around a tree, have at it. I'm talking here and I'll keep it simple for you..don't call for or half ass suggest or rally round a lynching. Of anyone. Good? Thanks.

I guess it is okay when Obama actually does the lynching like with Bin Laden. That it should be cheered on by all as the Gadaffi one where Clinton laughed like a demon was. These are all okay and can be discussed freely I am sure. A lot of posters seemed to cheer on those examples. I of course am not a hypocrite on lynching and was always against lynching as I believe in due process and a court of law. Brock SHOULD have said Obama SHOULD be put on trial for his crimes against humanity.

[brocktonblockbust]

Miles has nailed it and nailed it good as he SHOULD have!

[brocktonblockbust]

P.S. I support Saddam Hussein and was against his lynching by the Kangaroo Court set up by the United States of America. Saddam Hussein was my 4th cousin I am not kidding. Long Live Saddam!

[Gandalf]

That last post was a bit weird.

[brocktonblockbust]

That last post was a bit weird.

How so

[Master]

That last post was a bit weird.

Only his last post?

[brocktonblockbust]

That last post was a bit weird.

Only his last post?

Exactly Master has nailed it and nailed it good as he should. Gandalf is coming out with some bizarre stuff saying things like my last post was a bit weird when he would have a hard time finding a single post of mine over the past 14 years that was not at least a bit weird.

[El Kabong]

Where Kirk at? Where you at dawg? When is the impeachment?

[El Kabong]

Donald Trump is going to get us all killed you know....it'll happen any day now....(sips soy latte) I'm serious

[Master]

Trump has admitted paying off the porn star.

[walrus]

Trump has admitted paying off the porn star.

Even if he did who gives a shit. It happened long before his presidency. I think most of us knew he lived a playboy flashy life. Like you wouldn’t bang a pornstar, damn I hate mods

[Spicoli]

Trump has admitted paying off the porn star.

Not sure he admitted it so much as ol discombobulating gaffe Giuliani putting his foot in his mouth revealing Trump "misspoke" about payment.

Not often you hear Hannity sound shocked .