Why is a back-hand punch illegal?
and isnt a jab sometimes bordering very closely on being a back-hand punch? For example if you throw a left hook that misses, and then try to quickly throw a left jab, that jab will be starting out quite in a back-hand position, as you will not bring the missed left hook all the way back to the starting position to throw the subsequent jab. Therefore the left hand after missing the left hook will be somewhere around your right pectoral muscle, and from that position throwing a left jab is rather close to being a back-handed punch.
Re: Why is a back-hand punch illegal?
For a large part of his career, Ali used a back knuckle instead of a jab. If you watch his jab, he flicks it from the back side actually using a short back knuckle instead of a traditional jab. It had a lot more power and he could actually really hurt people with it.
Re: Why is a back-hand punch illegal?
The rules in the amateurs at least is the punch has to land with the knuckle part of the glove. The reason people get away with it is sloppy reffing. Hamed used to do it loads too.
Re: Why is a back-hand punch illegal?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
brocktonblockbust
For a large part of his career, Ali used a back knuckle instead of a jab. If you watch his jab, he flicks it from the back side actually using a short back knuckle instead of a traditional jab. It had a lot more power and he could actually really hurt people with it.
A back hand is basically an arm punch there will be no body or weight behind it. There is no way a back handed jab would hurt as much as a jab from Holmes.
Re: Why is a back-hand punch illegal?
side of the fist would hurt the most
Re: Why is a back-hand punch illegal?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
brocktonblockbust
side of the fist would hurt the most
you do know they wear padded gloves in boxing?
Re: Why is a back-hand punch illegal?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
brocktonblockbust
side of the fist would hurt the most
For sure, hard for a ref to pick on an angled hook / uppercut from in close, its a hammer fist really. You watch close and replay you see the outer wrist bone connect at times.Good cover after a push or shove away, then walk in with it. Some of Marcianos blows landed that way due to his stature and style.Those old gloves were raw leather through the sides no where near the amount of padding that was on top.
Re: Why is a back-hand punch illegal?
Yeah I seen many Marciano punches landing that way. Tyson used to intentionally throw a left uppercut so the wristbone would strike right around the delicate blood vessels under the armpit--he said in an interview he would aim for that inner-arm because it would break blood vessels and/or hit a nerve and paralyze the whole arm.
As for Howlin Mad Missy----are you so demented you believe the padding will prevent the pain? Even the padding in your psych-ward room didn't prevent your pain. So how could a padded glove? :cool:
Re: Why is a back-hand punch illegal?
Psyche ward padding ;D.
Funny thought, when they open the door to you, you just throw your head into the side of door.
:p what do they think they are dealing with nuts?
Re: Why is a back-hand punch illegal?
oh yeah, a whole lotta cocoNUTS!!
Re: Why is a back-hand punch illegal?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
brocktonblockbust
Yeah I seen many Marciano punches landing that way. Tyson used to intentionally throw a left uppercut so the wristbone would strike right around the delicate blood vessels under the armpit--he said in an interview he would aim for that inner-arm because it would break blood vessels and/or hit a nerve and paralyze the whole arm.
As for Howlin Mad Missy----are you so demented you believe the padding will prevent the pain? Even the padding in your psych-ward room didn't prevent your pain. So how could a padded glove? :cool:
See you didn't get in Ross's face with the answer he gave. I suggest you back off.
I would give a proper answer but can't be arsed since you're fucking thick.
Re: Why is a back-hand punch illegal?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Howlin Mad Missy
Quote:
Originally Posted by
brocktonblockbust
Yeah I seen many Marciano punches landing that way. Tyson used to intentionally throw a left uppercut so the wristbone would strike right around the delicate blood vessels under the armpit--he said in an interview he would aim for that inner-arm because it would break blood vessels and/or hit a nerve and paralyze the whole arm.
As for Howlin Mad Missy----are you so demented you believe the padding will prevent the pain? Even the padding in your psych-ward room didn't prevent your pain. So how could a padded glove? :cool:
See you didn't get in Ross's face with the answer he gave. I suggest you back off.
I would give a proper answer but can't be arsed since you're fucking thick.
I didnt even notice that!
Yes any sort of punch could hurt if thrown with enough force and not seen coming but if you had to hit a pad to create the most force measurable with your jabbing hand, then a slap or back hand punch wouldnt be the first choice. In my experience it would go uppercut, hook then jab, in order of how much weight and drive you can put behind each shot.
Re: Why is a back-hand punch illegal?
why should i get in ross' face? he gave a reasonable answer.
Re: Why is a back-hand punch illegal?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
ross
Quote:
Originally Posted by
brocktonblockbust
For a large part of his career, Ali used a back knuckle instead of a jab. If you watch his jab, he flicks it from the back side actually using a short back knuckle instead of a traditional jab. It had a lot more power and he could actually really hurt people with it.
A back hand is basically an arm punch there will be no body or weight behind it. There is no way a back handed jab would hurt as much as a jab from Holmes.
I'm not sure that this is correct. Consider that bringing the laft hand up and under- I think the term is a 'rising jab'- lands on the back of the knuckles. That, given the push off the rear foot, is a harder punch. That is why the old timers used it. When I was first learning about boxing, when I was 10 or so, I met a guy that had fought in the 1920s, and he showed me how to slip in back hand blows and how damaging they could be.
Of course, in those days they fought for real, with 4oz gloves, as opposed to the pillows they wear today. Given that, I can't see that there is any point in using the back of the hand.