Boxing Forums



User Tag List

Thanks Thanks:  0
Likes Likes:  0
Dislikes Dislikes:  0
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 26

Thread: Why is a back-hand punch illegal?

Share/Bookmark

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    Ex'way to your Skull
    Posts
    25,024
    Mentioned
    232 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    0
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Why is a back-hand punch illegal?

    For a large part of his career, Ali used a back knuckle instead of a jab. If you watch his jab, he flicks it from the back side actually using a short back knuckle instead of a traditional jab. It had a lot more power and he could actually really hurt people with it.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Guernsey, Channel Islands
    Posts
    8,719
    Mentioned
    208 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1395
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Why is a back-hand punch illegal?

    The rules in the amateurs at least is the punch has to land with the knuckle part of the glove. The reason people get away with it is sloppy reffing. Hamed used to do it loads too.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Guernsey, Channel Islands
    Posts
    8,719
    Mentioned
    208 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1395
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Why is a back-hand punch illegal?

    Quote Originally Posted by brocktonblockbust View Post
    For a large part of his career, Ali used a back knuckle instead of a jab. If you watch his jab, he flicks it from the back side actually using a short back knuckle instead of a traditional jab. It had a lot more power and he could actually really hurt people with it.
    A back hand is basically an arm punch there will be no body or weight behind it. There is no way a back handed jab would hurt as much as a jab from Holmes.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    Ex'way to your Skull
    Posts
    25,024
    Mentioned
    232 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    0
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Why is a back-hand punch illegal?

    side of the fist would hurt the most

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Posts
    19,037
    Mentioned
    21 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1962
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Why is a back-hand punch illegal?

    Quote Originally Posted by brocktonblockbust View Post
    side of the fist would hurt the most
    you do know they wear padded gloves in boxing?

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    Up in the attic
    Posts
    26,468
    Mentioned
    448 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    4168
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Why is a back-hand punch illegal?

    Quote Originally Posted by brocktonblockbust View Post
    side of the fist would hurt the most
    For sure, hard for a ref to pick on an angled hook / uppercut from in close, its a hammer fist really. You watch close and replay you see the outer wrist bone connect at times.Good cover after a push or shove away, then walk in with it. Some of Marcianos blows landed that way due to his stature and style.Those old gloves were raw leather through the sides no where near the amount of padding that was on top.
    Hidden Content " border="0" />

    I can explain it.
    But I cant understand it for you.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    Ex'way to your Skull
    Posts
    25,024
    Mentioned
    232 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    0
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Why is a back-hand punch illegal?

    Yeah I seen many Marciano punches landing that way. Tyson used to intentionally throw a left uppercut so the wristbone would strike right around the delicate blood vessels under the armpit--he said in an interview he would aim for that inner-arm because it would break blood vessels and/or hit a nerve and paralyze the whole arm.

    As for Howlin Mad Missy----are you so demented you believe the padding will prevent the pain? Even the padding in your psych-ward room didn't prevent your pain. So how could a padded glove?

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    Up in the attic
    Posts
    26,468
    Mentioned
    448 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    4168
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Why is a back-hand punch illegal?

    Psyche ward padding .

    Funny thought, when they open the door to you, you just throw your head into the side of door.

    what do they think they are dealing with nuts?
    Hidden Content " border="0" />

    I can explain it.
    But I cant understand it for you.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    Ex'way to your Skull
    Posts
    25,024
    Mentioned
    232 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    0
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Why is a back-hand punch illegal?

    oh yeah, a whole lotta cocoNUTS!!

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Posts
    19,037
    Mentioned
    21 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1962
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Why is a back-hand punch illegal?

    Quote Originally Posted by brocktonblockbust View Post
    Yeah I seen many Marciano punches landing that way. Tyson used to intentionally throw a left uppercut so the wristbone would strike right around the delicate blood vessels under the armpit--he said in an interview he would aim for that inner-arm because it would break blood vessels and/or hit a nerve and paralyze the whole arm.

    As for Howlin Mad Missy----are you so demented you believe the padding will prevent the pain? Even the padding in your psych-ward room didn't prevent your pain. So how could a padded glove?
    See you didn't get in Ross's face with the answer he gave. I suggest you back off.
    I would give a proper answer but can't be arsed since you're fucking thick.

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Guernsey, Channel Islands
    Posts
    8,719
    Mentioned
    208 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1395
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Why is a back-hand punch illegal?

    Quote Originally Posted by Howlin Mad Missy View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by brocktonblockbust View Post
    Yeah I seen many Marciano punches landing that way. Tyson used to intentionally throw a left uppercut so the wristbone would strike right around the delicate blood vessels under the armpit--he said in an interview he would aim for that inner-arm because it would break blood vessels and/or hit a nerve and paralyze the whole arm.

    As for Howlin Mad Missy----are you so demented you believe the padding will prevent the pain? Even the padding in your psych-ward room didn't prevent your pain. So how could a padded glove?
    See you didn't get in Ross's face with the answer he gave. I suggest you back off.
    I would give a proper answer but can't be arsed since you're fucking thick.
    I didnt even notice that!

    Yes any sort of punch could hurt if thrown with enough force and not seen coming but if you had to hit a pad to create the most force measurable with your jabbing hand, then a slap or back hand punch wouldnt be the first choice. In my experience it would go uppercut, hook then jab, in order of how much weight and drive you can put behind each shot.

  12. #12
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    McAllen, Texas?
    Posts
    5,504
    Mentioned
    177 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1215
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Why is a back-hand punch illegal?

    Quote Originally Posted by ross View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by brocktonblockbust View Post
    For a large part of his career, Ali used a back knuckle instead of a jab. If you watch his jab, he flicks it from the back side actually using a short back knuckle instead of a traditional jab. It had a lot more power and he could actually really hurt people with it.
    A back hand is basically an arm punch there will be no body or weight behind it. There is no way a back handed jab would hurt as much as a jab from Holmes.
    I'm not sure that this is correct. Consider that bringing the laft hand up and under- I think the term is a 'rising jab'- lands on the back of the knuckles. That, given the push off the rear foot, is a harder punch. That is why the old timers used it. When I was first learning about boxing, when I was 10 or so, I met a guy that had fought in the 1920s, and he showed me how to slip in back hand blows and how damaging they could be.
    Of course, in those days they fought for real, with 4oz gloves, as opposed to the pillows they wear today. Given that, I can't see that there is any point in using the back of the hand.

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Guernsey, Channel Islands
    Posts
    8,719
    Mentioned
    208 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1395
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Why is a back-hand punch illegal?

    Quote Originally Posted by greynotsoold View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by ross View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by brocktonblockbust View Post
    For a large part of his career, Ali used a back knuckle instead of a jab. If you watch his jab, he flicks it from the back side actually using a short back knuckle instead of a traditional jab. It had a lot more power and he could actually really hurt people with it.
    A back hand is basically an arm punch there will be no body or weight behind it. There is no way a back handed jab would hurt as much as a jab from Holmes.
    I'm not sure that this is correct. Consider that bringing the laft hand up and under- I think the term is a 'rising jab'- lands on the back of the knuckles. That, given the push off the rear foot, is a harder punch. That is why the old timers used it. When I was first learning about boxing, when I was 10 or so, I met a guy that had fought in the 1920s, and he showed me how to slip in back hand blows and how damaging they could be.
    Of course, in those days they fought for real, with 4oz gloves, as opposed to the pillows they wear today. Given that, I can't see that there is any point in using the back of the hand.
    Thats basically just a slap though. Yeah through thin gloves that would sting as the knuckles crack but you still wouldt be able to put as much force in as an uppercut or straight jab.

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    Ex'way to your Skull
    Posts
    25,024
    Mentioned
    232 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    0
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Why is a back-hand punch illegal?

    true but i can see what he means about pushing off the back foot whilst swinging upward using all the top of the shoulder strength. shite, those shots could even clip you in the throat.

  15. #15
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Guernsey, Channel Islands
    Posts
    8,719
    Mentioned
    208 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1395
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Why is a back-hand punch illegal?

    I dont know about everyone else but I dont get any more power from pushing off the backfoot when using the jabbing hand. Im left handed and find and teach people to drive upwards on the leading foot for power in the jab. Theres a sequence that needs to be followed to make the most on the momentum and not waste the energy that could go in to a simple jab.

    I broke my right hand by punching a wall in temper in my last season and couldnt use it even lightly for months. So I only used my left for months on the bags and the pads. My left got as good as I think it could get. I learnt how to drive properly to get force through it and it was sharp and had a loud clap sound sound when it landed on the pads or bag because the distance was right. I know not everyone is a big puncher but in my gym my jab was harder in the end than some of the other lads rights. My major problem was arm length. Holding a tape measure between the top of my right bicep where it meets the pectoral muscle down to the wrist is only 19" and im 5,9" which I think is disproportinate arm length?

    If someone was taught how to use the jab so it actually hurt an opponent they wouldnt bother using it to flick out with.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

     

Similar Threads

  1. WLadimir didn't even throw 1 right hand punch!
    By Klitsfan in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 17
    Last Post: 03-11-2007, 02:23 PM
  2. Question: Which punch breaks Floyd's hand?
    By Hairdoo in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 02-23-2007, 06:04 AM
  3. Khan set to hand back first title
    By ICB in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 12-10-2006, 07:58 PM
  4. Khan set to hand back first title
    By ICB in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 12-10-2006, 06:24 PM
  5. I may have broke a bone in the back of my hand
    By Douglas in forum Ask the Trainer
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 06-19-2006, 12:27 AM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  




Boxing | Boxing Photos | Boxing News | Boxing Forum | Boxing Rankings

Copyright © 2000 - 2025 Saddo Boxing - Boxing