Video: Scott defends himself, makes the conspiracy theorists look like dicks.
Re: Video: Scott defends himself, makes the conspiracy theorists look like dicks.
Gbp probably wrote that shit down on a paper and had him rehearse it.. cmon now lol..
Re: Video: Scott defends himself, makes the conspiracy theorists look like dicks.
I don't see how he dispelled anything or made anyone look like dicks, all he did essentially was deny everything. This is just damage control.
If he never fixed the fight, he got knocked out by a weak throwaway punch that was meant to distract him from a right that never landed. So either way, I have no interest in ever seeing this guy fight again.
Re: Video: Scott defends himself, makes the conspiracy theorists look like dicks.
He rehearsed that shit numerous times in front of his wife while on vacation.
Can you really blame him though? Its not like he was ever going to be a champion so he took the dxtra dough and ran with it..
Maybe gbp promised him another fight in the future.. maybe against Luis Ortiz or something..
Re: Video: Scott defends himself, makes the conspiracy theorists look like dicks.
If he gets a relatively big fight in the next few years we know for sure it was a fix, because a performance like that should kill a guy's relevance completely.
Re: Video: Scott defends himself, makes the conspiracy theorists look like dicks.
A bad performance yes, a fix no.
It's NOTHING like a fix. It's ridiculous, you're all moronic if you believe that.
---
Why do a fix and leave the fans pissed off after 90 secs of boxing?
Why give fans a reason to look for an excuse like a fix?
Why not have a few rounds of excitement before the stoppage?
Why not have Scott dropped fom a decent shot or body punch?
And if he wasn't really hurt WHY NOT GET UP AND TAKE A BETTER SHOT TO MAKE IT BELIEVEABLE?
WHY NOT MAKE THE STOPPAGE IN THE ROUND THAT HAD THE HIGHEST ODDS? If it was for financial reasons.
Why have the fight thrown in the direction of the favourite?
The lack of general logic on this website sometimes alarms me.
Re: Video: Scott defends himself, makes the conspiracy theorists look like dicks.
If you're going to accuse others of being moronic because of their logic, you should AT LEAST provide sound logic of your own. I'll take you point by point, because what you just posted was borderline retarded.
1. Why do a fix and leave the fans pissed off after 90 secs of boxing?
Why would fans be pissed at a first round knockout? That's what they wanted to see from Deontay: a brutal knockout. When have you EVER seen fans complaining about a first round knockout (providing it was a legit-looking)? The fans were cheering and happy… they only started booing when they saw the replay and saw that the right never landed and the left was a slap. That's probably one of the most idiotic points I've ever seen on this board. People hate early knockouts do they? You should be embarrassed.
2. Why give fans a reason to look for an excuse like a fix?
I doubt that was the intention. Why would a first round knockout lead fans to believe it was a fix? Deontay has brutal power and has never gone past 4. Malik was stopped (albeit controversially) by Chisora less than a year ago. I think the consensus was that Malik would make it into the mid rounds at least, but I don't think anyone was shocked that he went down in the first.
3. Why not have a few rounds of excitement before the stoppage?
Just think about that: if you know you're fixing the fight, why would you take unnecessary punishment along the way? You're saying that a first round knockout would have raised suspicion, but you think fighting a few rounds where they predetermined to be exciting but not knock each other out wouldn't be?? Again, these are not pro wrestlers, these are boxers. And Deontay isn't made for "exciting" exchanges: he has "knock you the fuck out" type of power. One punch and you're gone. So what are you suggesting, he was supposed to pull his punches? Nobody would notice that? Or are you suggesting they fight legit for a few rounds and THEN do the fix? If so, how exciting would those rounds REALLY be if they both didn't want to hurt each other? It would make both guys look bad. Another idiotic non-point.
4.Why not have Scott dropped fom a decent shot or body punch?
Because these are not pro wrestlers or stunt men who are trained to make fake punches look good. I'm sure Malik did think it was a decent shot: you forget, he didn't have the luxury that we had of watching the slow motions from every angle. Malik's not a stunt man who had a director look at shot and say "nope, didn't look good. Let's try it again." He took some contact and went down, hoping it looked good.
Or are you suggesting that Malik would have let Deontay land a LEGIT KO blow? If so, are you insane? Who the fuck would agree to be legit knocked out to the head or body? That's ridiculous. Why do that when you can take a wimpy punch, but claim it hit you on the sweet spot and temporarily threw off your equilibrium? Wouldn't that be much safer… oh wait, that's what they did.
5. And if he wasn't really hurt WHY NOT GET UP AND TAKE A BETTER SHOT TO MAKE IT BELIEVEABLE?
Because that's the point of a worked fight: you PRETEND to be hurt. And once again, Malik had no way of knowing how believable the shot looked: he took contact and went down. He didn't have the luxury of watching it on the replay in slow motion.
6.WHY NOT MAKE THE STOPPAGE IN THE ROUND THAT HAD THE HIGHEST ODDS? If it was for financial reasons.
I'm not sure what the odds were, but given the fact that Malik was looked at as a step up for Deontay and was known to be crafty, I'm sure betting heavily on a first round knockout for Deontay would have been quite profitable. Plus, like I mentioned earlier, the longer you draw out a fixed fight, the more suspicious it's going to look.
7. Why have the fight thrown in the direction of the favourite?
…why not? There are plenty of reasons, including the obvious one that they wanted to boost Deontay up by beating a quality guy, without taking the risk of actually fighting a quality guy. And you get to have Deontay do it in impressive fashion: a first round knockout.
The only benefit of having the underdog win is, obviously, the gambling money you can win. But you can make just as much profit by betting on the favourite to win in a specific round. So I have no idea what relevance that has.
Re: Video: Scott defends himself, makes the conspiracy theorists look like dicks.
The "fix" couldn't have been anything to do with gambling money because there were no suspicious betting patterns reported. There are no bookies up in arms about the result. These days you can spot these things long before an event takes place and a big big deal is made about it.
So who exactly made Scott take the dive? Wilder? Golden Boy?
