Was Roach right. Was he proper?
Freddie was right about Martinez and his mobility. If a trainers main responsibility is to ensure his fighter will win, was he right about the knee brace and everything else he did to get under the skin of Martinez?
I would say yes and I'd rather have roach with me than against me.
Re: Was Roach right. Was he proper?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
beenKOed
Freddie was right about Martinez and his mobility. If a trainers main responsibility is to ensure his fighter will win, was he right about the knee brace and everything else he did to get under the skin of Martinez?
I would say yes and I'd rather have roach with me than against me.
The name fits !!! The man is a coat riding scum bag
Re: Was Roach right. Was he proper?
people talk about floyd hand picking fights but roach is a professional at getting his fighters low risk high reward type fights. he seems to blatantly admit it too.
Re: Was Roach right. Was he proper?
and just to be clear, obviously a low risk high reward type of fight is the best type you can get but his fighters will always fight old fighters with bigger names instead of young good fighters or old good fighters at their proper weight.
Re: Was Roach right. Was he proper?
Roach can't be that good at it... Look what just happened to Provodnikov.
Re: Was Roach right. Was he proper?
Roach is always right and proper.
Re: Was Roach right. Was he proper?
No he is not right. Cotto was winning that fight regardless of the weight limit and knee brace. He had nothing left. If he really knew/believed that they wouldnt have made those stupid demands as it would make Cotto looks a lot better.
I dont think Roach is anything special as a trainer although for the most part I dont see a trainer needing to be particularly good to have sucess.
Re: Was Roach right. Was he proper?
Such an overrated trainer and a twat on top of it.
Re: Was Roach right. Was he proper?
I think most trainers today in the spotlight are overrated celebrities and that includes Roach but in this specific case there is little doubt in my mind that he was a major contributing factor in the win. He's still a trainer and knows the game and the nuances of footwork and especially how to fight a southpaw. Its not fair to discount the man from where we are all sitting. He may not be Ray Arcel but he's no Papa Trinidad either.
They executed a game plan almost flawlessly. They knew that Martinez relied more on his athleticism and reflexes then boxing fundamentals. They also knew that these two things had deteriorated over the past couple of years. From that they most likely theorized that they could take the ring away and pull the fight to Sergios left in order to scalp him with the right hand. The added bonus being Sergio's lazy left hand. And that's exactly what they did.
Re: Was Roach right. Was he proper?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
imp
Quote:
Originally Posted by
ruthless rocco
Roach can't be that good at it... Look what just happened to Provodnikov.
Exactly
Bradley already dealt with prov and just made it difficult for himself by trading with him.
Prov is a one dimensional overated fighter and I think everyone should stop choking on GGG cock as well.
He's a trainer, not a miracle worker. You cant blame Roach for that plodders loss anymore then you can blame Lamotta's loses to his trainer.
Re: Was Roach right. Was he proper?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
imp
Quote:
Originally Posted by
IamInuit
Quote:
Originally Posted by
imp
Quote:
Originally Posted by
ruthless rocco
Roach can't be that good at it... Look what just happened to Provodnikov.
Exactly
Bradley already dealt with prov and just made it difficult for himself by trading with him.
Prov is a one dimensional overated fighter and I think everyone should stop choking on GGG cock as well.
He's a trainer, not a miracle worker. You cant blame Roach for that plodders loss anymore then you can blame Lamotta's loses to his trainer.
Roach likes to think hes a miracle worker..slates off virgil hunter for no reason and khan when he decides to leave.
Roach is roach and arum has his back so he has a massive pedestal to say what he wants..
Yeah he's an odd fellow. He says all kinds of strange things out of the blue. May even take advantage of his disease to get away with shit.
We all have our flaws. He's a pretty good trainer in a field of posers that just cling on to a talent already established. I've always maintained that the best trainers are poor, friendless, live above or at the gym and like it that way.
Re: Was Roach right. Was he proper?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
imp
Quote:
Originally Posted by
ruthless rocco
Roach can't be that good at it... Look what just happened to Provodnikov.
Exactly
Bradley already dealt with prov and just made it difficult for himself by trading with him.
Prov is a one dimensional overated fighter and I think everyone should stop choking on GGG cock as well.
It's not like Prod got blown out. You have some validity with your statement of him being one dimensional but his dimension has brought him through a number of successful fights. Even this one an argument could be made that Prod won. I scored it a draw which I think is a fair call. I think Prods style continues to evolve and I think this fight in the end will help him improve.
I know there is a lot of hating here on Roach but I think he deserves the credit he gets in the boxing world. Khan left but I think he was immature under his Roach tutelage. Roach always got annoyed with Khans showboating which is evidence that Khan did not follow Roaches lead. Khan made the right move leaving Roach as I think he needed to start from scratch. Anyway, I can see Prod having a successful career and I see Roach playing a big part in that.