Run-clinch-dance-grab: at some point should fighters be DQ'ed?
I am so sick of fighters just dancing about the ring, throwing no punches, holding, clinching, grabbing, running, burning the clock, and not losing points over it.
Shouldnt there be a minimum number of punches a fighter needs to throw per round? 3 minutes = 180 seconds, I say if a fighter doesnt throw 30 punches a round he should lose 1 point, and if he continues to throw less than 30 for 3 consecutive rounds he should be disqualified.
Also if a fighter spends more than 30 seconds in clinches/hugs per round he should lose a point. And be DQ'ed if he does that for 3 consecutive rounds.
Re: Run-clinch-dance-grab: at some point should fighters be DQ'ed?
Re: Run-clinch-dance-grab: at some point should fighters be DQ'ed?
Fuck yes
Jesus Christ, cracking idea about losing the point
Re: Run-clinch-dance-grab: at some point should fighters be DQ'ed?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
brocktonblockbust
I am so sick of fighters just dancing about the ring, throwing no punches, holding, clinching, grabbing, running, burning the clock, and not losing points over it.
Shouldnt there be a minimum number of punches a fighter needs to throw per round? 3 minutes = 180 seconds, I say if a fighter doesnt throw 30 punches a round he should lose 1 point, and if he continues to throw less than 30 for 3 consecutive rounds he should be disqualified.
Also if a fighter spends more than 30 seconds in clinches/hugs per round he should lose a point. And be DQ'ed if he does that for 3 consecutive rounds.
I remember when Akinwande got DQ'd for holding on Lennox for the whole fight. We need more of that!
Re: Run-clinch-dance-grab: at some point should fighters be DQ'ed?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
ykdadamaja
Quote:
Originally Posted by
brocktonblockbust
I am so sick of fighters just dancing about the ring, throwing no punches, holding, clinching, grabbing, running, burning the clock, and not losing points over it.
Shouldnt there be a minimum number of punches a fighter needs to throw per round? 3 minutes = 180 seconds, I say if a fighter doesnt throw 30 punches a round he should lose 1 point, and if he continues to throw less than 30 for 3 consecutive rounds he should be disqualified.
Also if a fighter spends more than 30 seconds in clinches/hugs per round he should lose a point. And be DQ'ed if he does that for 3 consecutive rounds.
I remember when Akinwande got DQ'd for holding on Lennox for the whole fight. We need more of that!
aboslutely and if toothless taco doesnt agree, he is a clincher and a hugger himself :) :) :cool:
Re: Run-clinch-dance-grab: at some point should fighters be DQ'ed?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
brocktonblockbust
Quote:
Originally Posted by
ykdadamaja
Quote:
Originally Posted by
brocktonblockbust
I am so sick of fighters just dancing about the ring, throwing no punches, holding, clinching, grabbing, running, burning the clock, and not losing points over it.
Shouldnt there be a minimum number of punches a fighter needs to throw per round? 3 minutes = 180 seconds, I say if a fighter doesnt throw 30 punches a round he should lose 1 point, and if he continues to throw less than 30 for 3 consecutive rounds he should be disqualified.
Also if a fighter spends more than 30 seconds in clinches/hugs per round he should lose a point. And be DQ'ed if he does that for 3 consecutive rounds.
I remember when Akinwande got DQ'd for holding on Lennox for the whole fight. We need more of that!
aboslutely and if toothless taco doesnt agree, he is a clincher and a hugger himself :) :) :cool:
lolol
Re: Run-clinch-dance-grab: at some point should fighters be DQ'ed?
I would really like to see something done about excessive clinching and holding. It gets out of hand in so many fights. Also, rabbit punching to the back of the head has become an excepted tactic. Some of these issues could easily be remedied if refs did their jobs.
Re: Run-clinch-dance-grab: at some point should fighters be DQ'ed?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
ykdadamaja
Quote:
Originally Posted by
brocktonblockbust
I am so sick of fighters just dancing about the ring, throwing no punches, holding, clinching, grabbing, running, burning the clock, and not losing points over it.
Shouldnt there be a minimum number of punches a fighter needs to throw per round? 3 minutes = 180 seconds, I say if a fighter doesnt throw 30 punches a round he should lose 1 point, and if he continues to throw less than 30 for 3 consecutive rounds he should be disqualified.
Also if a fighter spends more than 30 seconds in clinches/hugs per round he should lose a point. And be DQ'ed if he does that for 3 consecutive rounds.
I remember when Akinwande got DQ'd for holding on Lennox for the whole fight. We need more of that!
Funny thing about that is Akinwande actually floored Lewis in that fight. But it was ignored due to all his hugging and holding.
Re: Run-clinch-dance-grab: at some point should fighters be DQ'ed?
You could argue that there is a skill in not letting people clinch you all fight.
It really doesn't happen that much, or at least no where near often enough to annoy me.
But there are some hugfests I have hated in the past.
Re: Run-clinch-dance-grab: at some point should fighters be DQ'ed?
Toothless Taco
David Jaco
Marciano, Rocco
Ron Price
Thinks twice
about The hay maker
David Price
Vincent Price
fried rice
vanilla Ice
Re: Run-clinch-dance-grab: at some point should fighters be DQ'ed?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
brocktonblockbust
Toothless Taco
David Jaco
Marciano, Rocco
Ron Price
Thinks twice
about The hay maker
David Price
Vincent Price
fried rice
vanilla Ice
This seems nice
But I like fried rice
And Ron Price
Brock look twice
And just be nice
Once or twice
Re: Run-clinch-dance-grab: at some point should fighters be DQ'ed?
Im not sure on this. I completely get what everyone is saying but what about the guys who come in real low to get on the inside and then throw their heads around using it as a weapon? Thats not exactly fair for the more skilled boxer.
Re: Run-clinch-dance-grab: at some point should fighters be DQ'ed?
Most fighters do it, remember getting annoyed at Vernon Forrest doing it against Shane in their second fight. Hatton did it a lot later in his career. It is up to the ref. Get Mills Lane type and they will not do it.
Re: Run-clinch-dance-grab: at some point should fighters be DQ'ed?
I think that the refs should let guys fight out of the clinch more. There is a skill to fighting inside, and some of that comes from maneuvering a guy into certain position through the clinch. The issue is that guys tie a fighter up and both just wait for the ref to break them. Watch John Ruiz, a notorious clincher, fight James Toney. James was the first guy I saw who didn't whine to the ref or just sit in the clinch with Ruiz and he would punish him inside. Watch old school fighters everyone says are ATGs like Robinson and Duran. They would clinch in close much like Ward and a Hopkins today. There is a skill involved when done correctly.
Re: Run-clinch-dance-grab: at some point should fighters be DQ'ed?
It's strange a guy like Hopkins is put on a pedestal, as a amazing fighter he is one of the worst fighters
for clinching and grabbing, truly horrible fighter to watch, but the refs love him they are to much
into licking his ass, than deducting him any points.