Re: The 2012 London Olympic Games
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Howlin Mad Missy
Quote:
Originally Posted by
ryanman
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Howlin Mad Missy
Quote:
Originally Posted by
ryanman
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Howlin Mad Missy
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Memphis
Why could they not go with the breakaway? If it was a relatively flat race and Cavendish had the legs to keep up why let them get away in the first place?
Vos was/is a strong sprinter and kept attacking & working the breaks
Stop trying to impress me!
Vos is more of an all-rounder really. Think of like an 800m runner. Cav would be 100m. She can climb ok and decent sprint but not an out and out sprinter. But in women's cycling it's a bit different as they don't have any real out and out sprinters.
either way - she got a gold we got nothing.
Well spotted.
Don't think that's up for debate.
But a few people seem interesting in learning a bit about the cycling as they hadn't seen much of it before.
that's one interpretation
Shut up Missy.
Re: The 2012 London Olympic Games
Quote:
Originally Posted by
ryanman
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Howlin Mad Missy
Quote:
Originally Posted by
ryanman
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Howlin Mad Missy
Quote:
Originally Posted by
ryanman
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Howlin Mad Missy
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Memphis
Why could they not go with the breakaway? If it was a relatively flat race and Cavendish had the legs to keep up why let them get away in the first place?
Vos was/is a strong sprinter and kept attacking & working the breaks
Stop trying to impress me!
Vos is more of an all-rounder really. Think of like an 800m runner. Cav would be 100m. She can climb ok and decent sprint but not an out and out sprinter. But in women's cycling it's a bit different as they don't have any real out and out sprinters.
either way - she got a gold we got nothing.
Well spotted.
Don't think that's up for debate.
But a few people seem interesting in learning a bit about the cycling as they hadn't seen much of it before.
that's one interpretation
Shut up Missy.
you thicko
Re: The 2012 London Olympic Games
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Howlin Mad Missy
Quote:
Originally Posted by
ryanman
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Howlin Mad Missy
Quote:
Originally Posted by
ryanman
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Howlin Mad Missy
Quote:
Originally Posted by
ryanman
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Howlin Mad Missy
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Memphis
Why could they not go with the breakaway? If it was a relatively flat race and Cavendish had the legs to keep up why let them get away in the first place?
Vos was/is a strong sprinter and kept attacking & working the breaks
Stop trying to impress me!
Vos is more of an all-rounder really. Think of like an 800m runner. Cav would be 100m. She can climb ok and decent sprint but not an out and out sprinter. But in women's cycling it's a bit different as they don't have any real out and out sprinters.
either way - she got a gold we got nothing.
Well spotted.
Don't think that's up for debate.
But a few people seem interesting in learning a bit about the cycling as they hadn't seen much of it before.
that's one interpretation
Shut up Missy.
you thicko
Of all the women that post on here - you are the thickest.
Re: The 2012 London Olympic Games
Now now children.
When did getting dressed before a penalty corner start happening? They've got cricket gloves and silence of the lamb type masks on. There was none of that in Sean Kerly's day.
Re: The 2012 London Olympic Games
yeah
these bummers aren't fit to lick Sherwani's boots
Re: The 2012 London Olympic Games
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Memphis
Now now children.
When did getting dressed before a penalty corner start happening? They've got cricket gloves and silence of the lamb type masks on. There was none of that in Sean Kerly's day.
pussies
Re: The 2012 London Olympic Games
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Mark TKO
yeah
these bummers aren't fit to lick Sherwani's boots
Shin pads optional, gum shield if you're bi-curious.
Re: The 2012 London Olympic Games
Quote:
Originally Posted by
superheavyrhun
Well....on a slightly related note....who slots in your top 3 lovelies of the Olympics so far?
Mine (purely from the Brits...)
1 - Zara Dampney
2 - Kerry-Anne Payne
3 - Lizzie Armitstead
I'm quite liking Jo Leedham in the basketball.
http://e0.365dm.com/12/05/660x350/Leedham_2772698.jpg
Re: The 2012 London Olympic Games
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Memphis
Quote:
Originally Posted by
superheavyrhun
Well....on a slightly related note....who slots in your top 3 lovelies of the Olympics so far?
Mine (purely from the Brits...)
1 - Zara Dampney
2 - Kerry-Anne Payne
3 - Lizzie Armitstead
I'm quite liking Jo Leedham in the basketball.
http://e0.365dm.com/12/05/660x350/Leedham_2772698.jpg
Giggedy.
Re: The 2012 London Olympic Games
I think you'll like Georgina Cassar. Oh and she's a gymnast..........and yes legal.
http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2012/...06_306x423.jpg
Re: The 2012 London Olympic Games
Apart from the utterly ridiculous glasses she's quite nice. But those glasses remind me of a guy at work, and he's a knob.
Re: The 2012 London Olympic Games
Ah mate the glasses complete the look for me.
The dude in work, you should punch him. I bet he's neither hot, a woman, or a rhythmic gymnast. Prick.
Re: The 2012 London Olympic Games
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Memphis
Ah mate the glasses complete the look for me.
The dude in work, you should punch him. I bet he's neither hot, a woman, or a rhythmic gymnast. Prick.
Fair play, he does need a slap, and I'm not sure if he's a little bit queer.
Re: The 2012 London Olympic Games
I think the biggest disappointment of the Olympics so far has to be the Australian women's beach volleyball team. Country with lots of stunning ladies that spend lots of time on the beach, and one is not at all attractive, while the other is only reasonably tidy.
Re: The 2012 London Olympic Games
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Memphis
Ah mate the glasses complete the look for me.
The dude in work, you should punch him. I bet he's neither hot, a woman, or a rhythmic gymnast. Prick.
The glasses are good.