Khan does not want to lose to Brook and would never give him the opportunity to KO him. He has given every excuse under the sun to not fight him but if Brook beats Spence he will have no excuse.
Printable View
Khan does not want to lose to Brook and would never give him the opportunity to KO him. He has given every excuse under the sun to not fight him but if Brook beats Spence he will have no excuse.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Master
Which is a good reason to root for Brook. :)
To take the excuses away from him.
Otherwise, Khan will begin to look a little like Canelo with GGG.
If Brook does beat Spence, he should tell Khan to go fuck himself.The World will be his Oyster.
How do you think Brook (who fought GGG) does against those middleweights you mentioned at the time GGG fought them?Quote:
Originally Posted by MasterNo, he would not win and i want an apology and an acceptance that i was right, otherwise I will keep on posting everyday.Quote:
Originally Posted by Batman
Geale: lost his second fight after GGG to Cotto who started at 140. Quit again.
Rubio: fought the early part of his career at 154. Losing to guys like Jantuah & Ouma. His best win at 160 is an inexperienced Lemieux.
Wade: what he really done? I thought he lost to Soliman.
Monroe: again his record is pretty lacking. Doesn't have a big punch but has some decent skills.
Murray: this would probably be the toughest test of the guys you listed.
You think all those guys beat the Brook that fought GGG?
It should be a written apology, with a signature, seal, and a dollop of lipstick kiss to provide no doubt as to who the sender is.Quote:
Originally Posted by MasterNo, he would not win and i want an apology and an acceptance that i was right, otherwise I will keep on posting everyday.Quote:
Originally Posted by Batman
Quote:
Originally Posted by GandalfIt should be a written apology, with a signature, seal, and a dollop of lipstick kiss to provide no doubt as to who the sender is.Quote:
Originally Posted by MasterNo, he would not win and i want an apology and an acceptance that i was right, otherwise I will keep on posting everyday.Quote:
Originally Posted by Batman
There should be crying involved as well.
Blood stained tears dropped in a delicate pattern across the letter are a welcome sign of sincerity.Quote:
Originally Posted by TitoFanQuote:
Originally Posted by GandalfIt should be a written apology, with a signature, seal, and a dollop of lipstick kiss to provide no doubt as to who the sender is.Quote:
Originally Posted by MasterNo, he would not win and i want an apology and an acceptance that i was right, otherwise I will keep on posting everyday.Quote:
Originally Posted by Batman
There should be crying involved as well.
Winner of Ward vs Kov 2 is the P4P best.
Early days yet for Lomachenko.
I think only Geale gets beaten because he was shot by that time the others beat Kell.Quote:
Originally Posted by AlphaHow do you think Brook (who fought GGG) does against those middleweights you mentioned at the time GGG fought them?Quote:
Originally Posted by MasterNo, he would not win and i want an apology and an acceptance that i was right, otherwise I will keep on posting everyday.Quote:
Originally Posted by Batman
Geale: lost his second fight after GGG to Cotto who started at 140. Quit again.
Rubio: fought the early part of his career at 154. Losing to guys like Jantuah & Ouma. His best win at 160 is an inexperienced Lemieux.
Wade: what he really done? I thought he lost to Soliman.
Monroe: again his record is pretty lacking. Doesn't have a big punch but has some decent skills.
Murray: this would probably be the toughest test of the guys you listed.
You think all those guys beat the Brook that fought GGG?
I think Brook could beat them all.
wade looked awful v golovkin, havent seen anything else of him though but he looked really really bad, almost as bad as prince charles martin S: I would think Brook would beat him.Quote:
Originally Posted by MasterI think only Geale gets beaten because he was shot by that time the others beat Kell.Quote:
Originally Posted by AlphaHow do you think Brook (who fought GGG) does against those middleweights you mentioned at the time GGG fought them?Quote:
Originally Posted by MasterNo, he would not win and i want an apology and an acceptance that i was right, otherwise I will keep on posting everyday.Quote:
Originally Posted by Batman
Geale: lost his second fight after GGG to Cotto who started at 140. Quit again.
Rubio: fought the early part of his career at 154. Losing to guys like Jantuah & Ouma. His best win at 160 is an inexperienced Lemieux.
Wade: what he really done? I thought he lost to Soliman.
Monroe: again his record is pretty lacking. Doesn't have a big punch but has some decent skills.
Murray: this would probably be the toughest test of the guys you listed.
You think all those guys beat the Brook that fought GGG?
Agreed and I think Brook would be able to handle Rubio. Monroe is a decent boxer but I think Kell is more than capable of beating him also.Quote:
Originally Posted by palmerqwade looked awful v golovkin, havent seen anything else of him though but he looked really really bad, almost as bad as prince charles martin S: I would think Brook would beat him.Quote:
Originally Posted by MasterI think only Geale gets beaten because he was shot by that time the others beat Kell.Quote:
Originally Posted by AlphaHow do you think Brook (who fought GGG) does against those middleweights you mentioned at the time GGG fought them?Quote:
Originally Posted by MasterNo, he would not win and i want an apology and an acceptance that i was right, otherwise I will keep on posting everyday.Quote:
Originally Posted by Batman
Geale: lost his second fight after GGG to Cotto who started at 140. Quit again.
Rubio: fought the early part of his career at 154. Losing to guys like Jantuah & Ouma. His best win at 160 is an inexperienced Lemieux.
Wade: what he really done? I thought he lost to Soliman.
Monroe: again his record is pretty lacking. Doesn't have a big punch but has some decent skills.
Murray: this would probably be the toughest test of the guys you listed.
You think all those guys beat the Brook that fought GGG?
Rubio lost to Jantuah and Ouma when they were at the top of their game at light middle.Quote:
Originally Posted by AlphaAgreed and I think Brook would be able to handle Rubio. Monroe is a decent boxer but I think Kell is more than capable of beating him also.Quote:
Originally Posted by palmerqwade looked awful v golovkin, havent seen anything else of him though but he looked really really bad, almost as bad as prince charles martin S: I would think Brook would beat him.Quote:
Originally Posted by MasterI think only Geale gets beaten because he was shot by that time the others beat Kell.Quote:
Originally Posted by AlphaHow do you think Brook (who fought GGG) does against those middleweights you mentioned at the time GGG fought them?Quote:
Originally Posted by MasterNo, he would not win and i want an apology and an acceptance that i was right, otherwise I will keep on posting everyday.Quote:
Originally Posted by Batman
Geale: lost his second fight after GGG to Cotto who started at 140. Quit again.
Rubio: fought the early part of his career at 154. Losing to guys like Jantuah & Ouma. His best win at 160 is an inexperienced Lemieux.
Wade: what he really done? I thought he lost to Soliman.
Monroe: again his record is pretty lacking. Doesn't have a big punch but has some decent skills.
Murray: this would probably be the toughest test of the guys you listed.
You think all those guys beat the Brook that fought GGG?
Regardless of what you think I am sure GGG would not say Brook was one of his best wins of his career, which is how this whole debate started. It was a scheduled fight and easy money.
When Golovkin was asked post fight why Brook, up to that point, had more success than anyone else he said - "Brook wasn't strong like Lemieux or Stevens but very good skill, great distance, speed."
He specifically named two dangerous punchers, not ALL the middleweights he's fought. He specifically noted Brook's superior ability.
Danny Jacobs said "the most notable guy on his resume by far is Kell Brook".Quote:
Originally Posted by MasterRubio lost to Jantuah and Ouma when they were at the top of their game at light middle.Quote:
Originally Posted by AlphaAgreed and I think Brook would be able to handle Rubio. Monroe is a decent boxer but I think Kell is more than capable of beating him also.Quote:
Originally Posted by palmerqwade looked awful v golovkin, havent seen anything else of him though but he looked really really bad, almost as bad as prince charles martin S: I would think Brook would beat him.Quote:
Originally Posted by MasterI think only Geale gets beaten because he was shot by that time the others beat Kell.Quote:
Originally Posted by AlphaHow do you think Brook (who fought GGG) does against those middleweights you mentioned at the time GGG fought them?Quote:
Originally Posted by MasterNo, he would not win and i want an apology and an acceptance that i was right, otherwise I will keep on posting everyday.Quote:
Originally Posted by Batman
Geale: lost his second fight after GGG to Cotto who started at 140. Quit again.
Rubio: fought the early part of his career at 154. Losing to guys like Jantuah & Ouma. His best win at 160 is an inexperienced Lemieux.
Wade: what he really done? I thought he lost to Soliman.
Monroe: again his record is pretty lacking. Doesn't have a big punch but has some decent skills.
Murray: this would probably be the toughest test of the guys you listed.
You think all those guys beat the Brook that fought GGG?
Regardless of what you think I am sure GGG would not say Brook was one of his best wins of his career, which is how this whole debate started. It was a scheduled fight and easy money.
GGG said "I believe I will bring an amazing show, like a drama show. This is the biggest test for me because Kell is a true champion.
"It's the biggest test for me, absolutely."
It would be silly for GGG not to count Brook as one of his best wins after those statements leading into the fight.