-
Re: Who’s had the vaccine ? Side effects ?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
TIC
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Kirkland Laing
Quote:
Originally Posted by
TIC
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Kirkland Laing
Quote:
Originally Posted by
TIC
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Kirkland Laing
Quote:
Originally Posted by
TIC
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Kirkland Laing
Quote:
Originally Posted by
TitoFan
Quote:
Originally Posted by
TIC
Quote:
Originally Posted by
ykdadamaja
Got my second Pfizer shot today. Within two weeks I should be fully vaccinated the nurse said. No side effects except for a bit of soreness in my arm, which is not a real side effect unless you are a little whiney bitch!
:cool:
I'm good.
you are right. if you got sick within those two weeks you would be considered unvaxxed. that is some bullshit
Your knowledge of how vaccines work in general is mindboggling.
https://www.saddoboxing.com/boxingfo...tid=5898&stc=1
i asked you to back up your claim with proof & all you have done is shit yourself & tell me you believe what other say. that is not proof of how you know
You won't accept any rational standard of proof. You're clinging to an irrational standard that's impossible to prove and you're terrified to even say you'd accept the virus exists if it could be proved.
As far as attitudes to the virus itself goes there are three groups of people.
The first group is the vast majority of the world's population who accept that the virus exists due to the overwhelming evidence. This includes every person on this board apart from yourself and, crucially, every single medical experts and virology-related qualified and credentialled person in the world.
The second group are the anti vaccine people and similar people with low levels of social trust. These are the people eating horse dewormer because they believe conspiracy theories about the vaccine. However even these people believe the virus exists.
The third group are the world's short bus people, the people who believe -- with zero evidence -- that the virus is some kind of hoax. This is the group that you're in. It's incumbent upon any of the nuts in this group to come up with any kind of evidence to back up their fantastical claims, not on the group containing every single expert that's qualified to speak about the virus in the entire world. If you can't come up with any evidence to show that the virus is a hoax, and of course you can't, then you're just another crazy person ranting on the internet.
you are claiming something is real & i continue to ask you to prove how you know this to be true. if you claim something to be real it is rational for me to ask you to prove how you know this to be true. i am disputing the claim that is being made. it is not my job to prove someone else's claim to be true. where is seven time larry to call you out on your fallacy? saying that because so called experts believe something to be real is not proof of that claim being true. it's a fallacy. why do you keep bring up other people? i am talking to you. you made a claim that you know it exists. i am only interested in you proving your claim of how you know that to be true. read this very carefully. believing what others have said is not proof of how you know that claim is true
Unless you can come up with evidence for your crazy, whackadoodle theory that's shared only by a small minority of the population then I'm afraid you're just another crazy person ranting on the internet.
your hand wave dismissal only goes to highlight your inability to prove your claims to be true dipshit
Once again, unless you can provide some evidence to back up your argument you're just another ranting nutter on the internet.
so you are admitting you are unable to back up your claim of how you know it exists? knowing & believing are two different things. don't make claims that you know something is real that you can't prove to be true because i will continue to highlight your stupidity
Evidence/argument/nutter/internet.
-
Re: Who’s had the vaccine ? Side effects ?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Kirkland Laing
Quote:
Originally Posted by
TIC
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Kirkland Laing
Quote:
Originally Posted by
TIC
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Kirkland Laing
Quote:
Originally Posted by
TIC
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Kirkland Laing
Quote:
Originally Posted by
TIC
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Kirkland Laing
Quote:
Originally Posted by
TitoFan
Quote:
Originally Posted by
TIC
Quote:
Originally Posted by
ykdadamaja
Got my second Pfizer shot today. Within two weeks I should be fully vaccinated the nurse said. No side effects except for a bit of soreness in my arm, which is not a real side effect unless you are a little whiney bitch!
:cool:
I'm good.
you are right. if you got sick within those two weeks you would be considered unvaxxed. that is some bullshit
Your knowledge of how vaccines work in general is mindboggling.
https://www.saddoboxing.com/boxingfo...tid=5898&stc=1
i asked you to back up your claim with proof & all you have done is shit yourself & tell me you believe what other say. that is not proof of how you know
You won't accept any rational standard of proof. You're clinging to an irrational standard that's impossible to prove and you're terrified to even say you'd accept the virus exists if it could be proved.
As far as attitudes to the virus itself goes there are three groups of people.
The first group is the vast majority of the world's population who accept that the virus exists due to the overwhelming evidence. This includes every person on this board apart from yourself and, crucially, every single medical experts and virology-related qualified and credentialled person in the world.
The second group are the anti vaccine people and similar people with low levels of social trust. These are the people eating horse dewormer because they believe conspiracy theories about the vaccine. However even these people believe the virus exists.
The third group are the world's short bus people, the people who believe -- with zero evidence -- that the virus is some kind of hoax. This is the group that you're in. It's incumbent upon any of the nuts in this group to come up with any kind of evidence to back up their fantastical claims, not on the group containing every single expert that's qualified to speak about the virus in the entire world. If you can't come up with any evidence to show that the virus is a hoax, and of course you can't, then you're just another crazy person ranting on the internet.
you are claiming something is real & i continue to ask you to prove how you know this to be true. if you claim something to be real it is rational for me to ask you to prove how you know this to be true. i am disputing the claim that is being made. it is not my job to prove someone else's claim to be true. where is seven time larry to call you out on your fallacy? saying that because so called experts believe something to be real is not proof of that claim being true. it's a fallacy. why do you keep bring up other people? i am talking to you. you made a claim that you know it exists. i am only interested in you proving your claim of how you know that to be true. read this very carefully. believing what others have said is not proof of how you know that claim is true
Unless you can come up with evidence for your crazy, whackadoodle theory that's shared only by a small minority of the population then I'm afraid you're just another crazy person ranting on the internet.
your hand wave dismissal only goes to highlight your inability to prove your claims to be true dipshit
Once again, unless you can provide some evidence to back up your argument you're just another ranting nutter on the internet.
so you are admitting you are unable to back up your claim of how you know it exists? knowing & believing are two different things. don't make claims that you know something is real that you can't prove to be true because i will continue to highlight your stupidity
Evidence/argument/nutter/internet.
makes claims. can't back them up. total retard
-
Re: Who’s had the vaccine ? Side effects ?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Kirkland Laing
Tic needs to go to kindergarten then.
-
1 Attachment(s)
Re: Who’s had the vaccine ? Side effects ?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
TIC
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Kirkland Laing
Quote:
Originally Posted by
TIC
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Kirkland Laing
Quote:
Originally Posted by
TIC
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Kirkland Laing
Quote:
Originally Posted by
TIC
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Kirkland Laing
Quote:
Originally Posted by
TIC
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Kirkland Laing
Quote:
Originally Posted by
TitoFan
Quote:
Originally Posted by
TIC
Quote:
Originally Posted by
ykdadamaja
Got my second Pfizer shot today. Within two weeks I should be fully vaccinated the nurse said. No side effects except for a bit of soreness in my arm, which is not a real side effect unless you are a little whiney bitch!
:cool:
I'm good.
you are right. if you got sick within those two weeks you would be considered unvaxxed. that is some bullshit
Your knowledge of how vaccines work in general is mindboggling.
https://www.saddoboxing.com/boxingfo...tid=5898&stc=1
i asked you to back up your claim with proof & all you have done is shit yourself & tell me you believe what other say. that is not proof of how you know
You won't accept any rational standard of proof. You're clinging to an irrational standard that's impossible to prove and you're terrified to even say you'd accept the virus exists if it could be proved.
As far as attitudes to the virus itself goes there are three groups of people.
The first group is the vast majority of the world's population who accept that the virus exists due to the overwhelming evidence. This includes every person on this board apart from yourself and, crucially, every single medical experts and virology-related qualified and credentialled person in the world.
The second group are the anti vaccine people and similar people with low levels of social trust. These are the people eating horse dewormer because they believe conspiracy theories about the vaccine. However even these people believe the virus exists.
The third group are the world's short bus people, the people who believe -- with zero evidence -- that the virus is some kind of hoax. This is the group that you're in. It's incumbent upon any of the nuts in this group to come up with any kind of evidence to back up their fantastical claims, not on the group containing every single expert that's qualified to speak about the virus in the entire world. If you can't come up with any evidence to show that the virus is a hoax, and of course you can't, then you're just another crazy person ranting on the internet.
you are claiming something is real & i continue to ask you to prove how you know this to be true. if you claim something to be real it is rational for me to ask you to prove how you know this to be true. i am disputing the claim that is being made. it is not my job to prove someone else's claim to be true. where is seven time larry to call you out on your fallacy? saying that because so called experts believe something to be real is not proof of that claim being true. it's a fallacy. why do you keep bring up other people? i am talking to you. you made a claim that you know it exists. i am only interested in you proving your claim of how you know that to be true. read this very carefully. believing what others have said is not proof of how you know that claim is true
Unless you can come up with evidence for your crazy, whackadoodle theory that's shared only by a small minority of the population then I'm afraid you're just another crazy person ranting on the internet.
your hand wave dismissal only goes to highlight your inability to prove your claims to be true dipshit
Once again, unless you can provide some evidence to back up your argument you're just another ranting nutter on the internet.
so you are admitting you are unable to back up your claim of how you know it exists? knowing & believing are two different things. don't make claims that you know something is real that you can't prove to be true because i will continue to highlight your stupidity
Evidence/argument/nutter/internet.
makes claims. can't back them up. total retard
https://www.saddoboxing.com/boxingfo...tid=5899&stc=1
-
Re: Who’s had the vaccine ? Side effects ?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
TIC
Quote:
Originally Posted by
TitoFan
Hey.
Does personal experience count? Last November, several members of my family and myself attended a social function. Although we had tried to take all the necessary precautions, some of us got sick soon after. We all got sick at the same time... our symptoms were exactly what was being described as COVID symptoms... and fortunately we all came out of it fairly well. My own symptoms lasted about a week and a half. In talking to other people who attended that function, some of them got sick too.
Now... I'm not interested in debating with you about whether it's
"caught from outside the body, through the air or surfaces." You've made it clear you're not interested in what anyone else has to say.
I'll just leave this here to lighten the general mood.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eY7ZX6ngOSs
yes personal experience does count. so not everyone got sick? i'm not interested in debating. i'm interested in knowing. are you saying there are no other possibilities as to why some of you got sick? i'm not interested in what others have to say. i'm interested in what others know to be true
Glad you at least admit that personal experience does count. It would've been worrisome otherwise. Am I saying there are no other possibilities as to why some of us got sick? Absolutely. The timing... the symptoms... the circumstances. When I've backtracked and compiled all the data from those who actually attended the event... it becomes clear as day.
So... you claim you're "interested" in what others know to be true? Well... here it is. I know the facts to be true. I'll just leave it at that.
-
1 Attachment(s)
Re: Who’s had the vaccine ? Side effects ?
-
Re: Who’s had the vaccine ? Side effects ?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
TitoFan
Quote:
Originally Posted by
TIC
Quote:
Originally Posted by
TitoFan
Hey.
Does personal experience count? Last November, several members of my family and myself attended a social function. Although we had tried to take all the necessary precautions, some of us got sick soon after. We all got sick at the same time... our symptoms were exactly what was being described as COVID symptoms... and fortunately we all came out of it fairly well. My own symptoms lasted about a week and a half. In talking to other people who attended that function, some of them got sick too.
Now... I'm not interested in debating with you about whether it's
"caught from outside the body, through the air or surfaces." You've made it clear you're not interested in what anyone else has to say.
I'll just leave this here to lighten the general mood.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eY7ZX6ngOSs
yes personal experience does count. so not everyone got sick? i'm not interested in debating. i'm interested in knowing. are you saying there are no other possibilities as to why some of you got sick? i'm not interested in what others have to say. i'm interested in what others know to be true
Glad you at least admit that personal experience does count. It would've been worrisome otherwise. Am I saying there are no other possibilities as to why some of us got sick?
Absolutely. The timing... the symptoms... the circumstances. When I've backtracked and compiled all the data from those who actually attended the event... it becomes clear as day.
So... you claim you're "interested" in what others know to be true? Well... here it is. I know the facts to be true. I'll just leave it at that.
personal experience with isolating the virus from an infected person. proving they were infected from outside the body & the using that isolated virus to infect a healthy person from outside the body through the air or off surfaces. not your beliefs on what you think is true. you claim that there is absolutely no other possibility on why some of you got sick. i can name a number of other possibilities off the top of my head. you haven't even proved how you know covaids is real yet & are stating there is no other possibility. & you can't see the problem with that. backtracking & compiling data is not proving how you know covaids is a virus caught through the air or off surfaces. you can't claim beliefs to be facts until have proven them to be true
-
Re: Who’s had the vaccine ? Side effects ?
https://twitter.com/RonFilipkowski/s...44282759614478
I have to say if I was the deep state operative given the task of getting Trump supporters to ingest the vaccine by putting it in a foodstuff I wouldn't have picked a salad-related product.
Worth noting that even these crazy cunts believe that the virus exists.
-
Re: Who’s had the vaccine ? Side effects ?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
TIC
Quote:
Originally Posted by
TitoFan
Quote:
Originally Posted by
TIC
Quote:
Originally Posted by
TitoFan
Hey.
Does personal experience count? Last November, several members of my family and myself attended a social function. Although we had tried to take all the necessary precautions, some of us got sick soon after. We all got sick at the same time... our symptoms were exactly what was being described as COVID symptoms... and fortunately we all came out of it fairly well. My own symptoms lasted about a week and a half. In talking to other people who attended that function, some of them got sick too.
Now... I'm not interested in debating with you about whether it's
"caught from outside the body, through the air or surfaces." You've made it clear you're not interested in what anyone else has to say.
I'll just leave this here to lighten the general mood.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eY7ZX6ngOSs
yes personal experience does count. so not everyone got sick? i'm not interested in debating. i'm interested in knowing. are you saying there are no other possibilities as to why some of you got sick? i'm not interested in what others have to say. i'm interested in what others know to be true
Glad you at least admit that personal experience does count. It would've been worrisome otherwise. Am I saying there are no other possibilities as to why some of us got sick?
Absolutely. The timing... the symptoms... the circumstances. When I've backtracked and compiled all the data from those who actually attended the event... it becomes clear as day.
So... you claim you're "interested" in what others know to be true? Well... here it is. I know the facts to be true. I'll just leave it at that.
personal experience with isolating the virus from an infected person. proving they were infected from outside the body & the using that isolated virus to infect a healthy person from outside the body through the air or off surfaces. not your beliefs on what you think is true. you claim that there is absolutely no other possibility on why some of you got sick. i can name a number of other possibilities off the top of my head. you haven't even proved how you know covaids is real yet & are stating there is no other possibility. & you can't see the problem with that. backtracking & compiling data is not proving how you know covaids is a virus caught through the air or off surfaces. you can't claim beliefs to be facts until have proven them to be true
Soooo..... first you say "yes, personal experience does count." Buuuuttt... when presented with personal experience you add the disclaimer "... with isolating the virus from an infected person... etc, etc.... blah, blah, blah."
You claim you can (cough) "name a number of possibilities off the top of your head", as to why several of us would get sick at the same time... off the same social event... with exactly the same symptoms... all exactly as COVID symptoms are described. I see. :rolleyes:
Well... here's MY disclaimer.
A while back I told you I couldn't give less of a shit whether you believed COVID, masks, vaccines, or not. After that... I stopped trying to talk sense into you... (although I've seen others stubbornly continue to do so).
So don't take this as me trying to get back to trying to convince you of ANYTHING. I was just curious as to what your response would be when actually presented with someone with personal experience.
Predictably, you twisted yourself into a knot trying to sound knowledgeable when in actually you've just further exposed yourself for the fraud you are.
I feel sorry for anyone who actually has to deal with you in real life.
-
Re: Who’s had the vaccine ? Side effects ?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Kirkland Laing
https://twitter.com/RonFilipkowski/s...44282759614478
I have to say if I was the deep state operative given the task of getting Trump supporters to ingest the vaccine by putting it in a foodstuff I wouldn't have picked a salad-related product.
Worth noting that even these crazy cunts believe that the virus exists.
believing the virus exists & knowing the virus exists are two completely different things
-
Re: Who’s had the vaccine ? Side effects ?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
TitoFan
Quote:
Originally Posted by
TIC
Quote:
Originally Posted by
TitoFan
Quote:
Originally Posted by
TIC
Quote:
Originally Posted by
TitoFan
Hey.
Does personal experience count? Last November, several members of my family and myself attended a social function. Although we had tried to take all the necessary precautions, some of us got sick soon after. We all got sick at the same time... our symptoms were exactly what was being described as COVID symptoms... and fortunately we all came out of it fairly well. My own symptoms lasted about a week and a half. In talking to other people who attended that function, some of them got sick too.
Now... I'm not interested in debating with you about whether it's
"caught from outside the body, through the air or surfaces." You've made it clear you're not interested in what anyone else has to say.
I'll just leave this here to lighten the general mood.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eY7ZX6ngOSs
yes personal experience does count. so not everyone got sick? i'm not interested in debating. i'm interested in knowing. are you saying there are no other possibilities as to why some of you got sick? i'm not interested in what others have to say. i'm interested in what others know to be true
Glad you at least admit that personal experience does count. It would've been worrisome otherwise. Am I saying there are no other possibilities as to why some of us got sick?
Absolutely. The timing... the symptoms... the circumstances. When I've backtracked and compiled all the data from those who actually attended the event... it becomes clear as day.
So... you claim you're "interested" in what others know to be true? Well... here it is. I know the facts to be true. I'll just leave it at that.
personal experience with isolating the virus from an infected person. proving they were infected from outside the body & the using that isolated virus to infect a healthy person from outside the body through the air or off surfaces. not your beliefs on what you think is true. you claim that there is absolutely no other possibility on why some of you got sick. i can name a number of other possibilities off the top of my head. you haven't even proved how you know covaids is real yet & are stating there is no other possibility. & you can't see the problem with that. backtracking & compiling data is not proving how you know covaids is a virus caught through the air or off surfaces. you can't claim beliefs to be facts until have proven them to be true
Soooo..... first you say
"yes, personal experience does count." Buuuuttt... when presented with personal experience you add the disclaimer
"... with isolating the virus from an infected person... etc, etc.... blah, blah, blah."
You claim you can (cough)
"name a number of possibilities off the top of your head", as to why several of us would get sick at the same time... off the same social event... with exactly the same symptoms... all exactly as COVID symptoms are described. I see. :rolleyes:
Well... here's
MY disclaimer.
A while back I told you I couldn't give less of a shit whether you believed COVID, masks, vaccines, or not. After that... I stopped trying to talk sense into you... (although I've seen others stubbornly continue to do so).
So don't take this as me trying to get back to trying to convince you of ANYTHING. I was just curious as to what your response would be when actually presented with someone with personal experience.
Predictably, you twisted yourself into a knot trying to sound knowledgeable when in actually you've just further exposed yourself for the fraud you are.
I feel sorry for anyone who actually has to deal with you in real life.
yes personal experience does count when you can prove to know something is true. your experience was only of some of you getting sick. not proof of convid being a virus caught from outside the body through the air or off surfaces. you just believe it was convid. you can't prove to know that to be true. you can't even admit to yourself that you only believe convid is real. you don't know that to be true & your angry because your illusion is being highlighted. if you want to use words like absolutely & facts then you better bring proof of how you know your claims are true to the table
-
Re: Who’s had the vaccine ? Side effects ?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
TIC
Quote:
Originally Posted by
TitoFan
Quote:
Originally Posted by
TIC
Quote:
Originally Posted by
TitoFan
Quote:
Originally Posted by
TIC
Quote:
Originally Posted by
TitoFan
Hey.
Does personal experience count? Last November, several members of my family and myself attended a social function. Although we had tried to take all the necessary precautions, some of us got sick soon after. We all got sick at the same time... our symptoms were exactly what was being described as COVID symptoms... and fortunately we all came out of it fairly well. My own symptoms lasted about a week and a half. In talking to other people who attended that function, some of them got sick too.
Now... I'm not interested in debating with you about whether it's
"caught from outside the body, through the air or surfaces." You've made it clear you're not interested in what anyone else has to say.
I'll just leave this here to lighten the general mood.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eY7ZX6ngOSs
yes personal experience does count. so not everyone got sick? i'm not interested in debating. i'm interested in knowing. are you saying there are no other possibilities as to why some of you got sick? i'm not interested in what others have to say. i'm interested in what others know to be true
Glad you at least admit that personal experience does count. It would've been worrisome otherwise. Am I saying there are no other possibilities as to why some of us got sick?
Absolutely. The timing... the symptoms... the circumstances. When I've backtracked and compiled all the data from those who actually attended the event... it becomes clear as day.
So... you claim you're "interested" in what others know to be true? Well... here it is. I know the facts to be true. I'll just leave it at that.
personal experience with isolating the virus from an infected person. proving they were infected from outside the body & the using that isolated virus to infect a healthy person from outside the body through the air or off surfaces. not your beliefs on what you think is true. you claim that there is absolutely no other possibility on why some of you got sick. i can name a number of other possibilities off the top of my head. you haven't even proved how you know covaids is real yet & are stating there is no other possibility. & you can't see the problem with that. backtracking & compiling data is not proving how you know covaids is a virus caught through the air or off surfaces. you can't claim beliefs to be facts until have proven them to be true
Soooo..... first you say
"yes, personal experience does count." Buuuuttt... when presented with personal experience you add the disclaimer
"... with isolating the virus from an infected person... etc, etc.... blah, blah, blah."
You claim you can (cough)
"name a number of possibilities off the top of your head", as to why several of us would get sick at the same time... off the same social event... with exactly the same symptoms... all exactly as COVID symptoms are described. I see. :rolleyes:
Well... here's
MY disclaimer.
A while back I told you I couldn't give less of a shit whether you believed COVID, masks, vaccines, or not. After that... I stopped trying to talk sense into you... (although I've seen others stubbornly continue to do so).
So don't take this as me trying to get back to trying to convince you of ANYTHING. I was just curious as to what your response would be when actually presented with someone with personal experience.
Predictably, you twisted yourself into a knot trying to sound knowledgeable when in actually you've just further exposed yourself for the fraud you are.
I feel sorry for anyone who actually has to deal with you in real life.
yes personal experience does count when you can prove to know something is true. your experience was only of some of you getting sick. not proof of convid being a virus caught from outside the body through the air or off surfaces. you just believe it was convid. you can't prove to know that to be true. you can't even admit to yourself that you only believe convid is real. you don't know that to be true & your angry because your illusion is being highlighted. if you want to use words like absolutely & facts then you better bring proof of how you know your claims are true to the table
I would be "angry" if your opinion mattered one millionth of one iota.
But it doesn't... so I'm not. ;)
-
Re: Who’s had the vaccine ? Side effects ?
The thing is TIC, your inability to grasp very basic scientific principles does nothing to refute the mountain of evidence.
You are the one making wild unsubstantiated claims and then failing to provide any evidence.
You are claiming that millions of scientists around the entire world are engaged in the biggest fraud the world has ever seen, without one iota of evidence to even suggest a motive, let alone any data on which to formulate an hypothesis.
'Believing is not the same as knowing' is a meaningless childish phrase. It doesn't do anything but reveal how little you bring to the table in your Emperors clothes.
You are obviously a very gullible easily led plum.
Embarrassing stuff.
-
Re: Who’s had the vaccine ? Side effects ?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Beanz
The thing is TIC, your inability to grasp very basic scientific principles does nothing to refute the mountain of evidence.
You are the one making wild unsubstantiated claims and then failing to provide any evidence.
You are claiming that millions of scientists around the entire world are engaged in the biggest fraud the world has ever seen, without one iota of evidence to even suggest a motive, let alone any data on which to formulate an hypothesis.
'Believing is not the same as knowing' is a meaningless childish phrase. It doesn't do anything but reveal how little you bring to the table in your Emperors clothes.
You are obviously a very gullible easily led plum.
Embarrassing stuff.
none of what you are saying is proof of your claim that it is a demonstrable fact. i asked you to prove that claim to be true & you still can't & you can't bring yourself to admit you only hold a belief you spastic
-
Re: Who’s had the vaccine ? Side effects ?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
TIC
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Beanz
The thing is TIC, your inability to grasp very basic scientific principles does nothing to refute the mountain of evidence.
You are the one making wild unsubstantiated claims and then failing to provide any evidence.
You are claiming that millions of scientists around the entire world are engaged in the biggest fraud the world has ever seen, without one iota of evidence to even suggest a motive, let alone any data on which to formulate an hypothesis.
'Believing is not the same as knowing' is a meaningless childish phrase. It doesn't do anything but reveal how little you bring to the table in your Emperors clothes.
You are obviously a very gullible easily led plum.
Embarrassing stuff.
none of what you are saying is proof of your claim that it is a demonstrable fact. i asked you to prove that claim to be true & you still can't & you can't bring yourself to admit you only hold a belief you spastic
I haven't claimed anything.
The existence and contagiousness of Covid-19 is an established fact, that only you without any evidence presented to dispute it, have 'claimed' here.
You seem to think that by pretending that the world should guess at your not yet revealed method of verifying truth, you have pulled out an ace, but actually you not understanding very simple concepts is not evidence of anything but your own failure to grasp rudimentary principles.
All it reveals is that in your eyes anyone who doesn't simply copy and paste the contrary 'for the sake of it' opinions of others like you have, is stupid.
So you don't even own your own opinion.
Until you can admit that there are such things as agreed facts and accepted scientific conclusions, yours is a fairy tale belief that has nothing to do with facts, science, personal experience or evidence.
-
Re: Who’s had the vaccine ? Side effects ?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Beanz
Quote:
Originally Posted by
TIC
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Beanz
The thing is TIC, your inability to grasp very basic scientific principles does nothing to refute the mountain of evidence.
You are the one making wild unsubstantiated claims and then failing to provide any evidence.
You are claiming that millions of scientists around the entire world are engaged in the biggest fraud the world has ever seen, without one iota of evidence to even suggest a motive, let alone any data on which to formulate an hypothesis.
'Believing is not the same as knowing' is a meaningless childish phrase. It doesn't do anything but reveal how little you bring to the table in your Emperors clothes.
You are obviously a very gullible easily led plum.
Embarrassing stuff.
none of what you are saying is proof of your claim that it is a demonstrable fact. i asked you to prove that claim to be true & you still can't & you can't bring yourself to admit you only hold a belief you spastic
I haven't claimed anything.
The existence and contagiousness of Covid-19 is an established fact, that only you without any evidence presented to dispute it, have
'claimed' here.
You seem to think that by pretending that the world should guess at your not yet revealed method of verifying truth, you have pulled out an ace, but actually you not understanding very simple concepts is not evidence of anything but your own failure to grasp rudimentary principles.
All it reveals is that in your eyes anyone who doesn't simply copy and paste the contrary 'for the sake of it' opinions of others like you have, is stupid.
So you don't even own your own opinion.
Until you can admit that there are such things as agreed facts and accepted scientific conclusions, yours is a fairy tale belief that has nothing to do with facts, science, personal experience or evidence.
you claimed it is clearly a demonstrable fact. that convid is an airborne virus & now that the existence & contagiousness of convid is an established fact. you are a proven liar but i will highlight that again. & i'll ask you again to prove how you know those claims to be true? believing what others have told you is not knowing retard. so tell me how you have demonstrated it to be a fact. what you did to prove it was airborne & what you did to prove it's existence & contagiousness as an established fact. i don't want your fallacies just your proof to back up your claims. i'm talking to you seven times larry. so no need to mention anyone else & what you think or believe they have done. just your own proof to back up your claims
-
Re: Who’s had the vaccine ? Side effects ?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
TIC
Quote:
Originally Posted by
TitoFan
Quote:
Originally Posted by
TIC
Quote:
Originally Posted by
TitoFan
Quote:
Originally Posted by
TIC
Quote:
Originally Posted by
TitoFan
Hey.
Does personal experience count? Last November, several members of my family and myself attended a social function. Although we had tried to take all the necessary precautions, some of us got sick soon after. We all got sick at the same time... our symptoms were exactly what was being described as COVID symptoms... and fortunately we all came out of it fairly well. My own symptoms lasted about a week and a half. In talking to other people who attended that function, some of them got sick too.
Now... I'm not interested in debating with you about whether it's
"caught from outside the body, through the air or surfaces." You've made it clear you're not interested in what anyone else has to say.
I'll just leave this here to lighten the general mood.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eY7ZX6ngOSs
yes personal experience does count. so not everyone got sick? i'm not interested in debating. i'm interested in knowing. are you saying there are no other possibilities as to why some of you got sick? i'm not interested in what others have to say. i'm interested in what others know to be true
Glad you at least admit that personal experience does count. It would've been worrisome otherwise. Am I saying there are no other possibilities as to why some of us got sick?
Absolutely. The timing... the symptoms... the circumstances. When I've backtracked and compiled all the data from those who actually attended the event... it becomes clear as day.
So... you claim you're "interested" in what others know to be true? Well... here it is. I know the facts to be true. I'll just leave it at that.
personal experience with isolating the virus from an infected person. proving they were infected from outside the body & the using that isolated virus to infect a healthy person from outside the body through the air or off surfaces. not your beliefs on what you think is true. you claim that there is absolutely no other possibility on why some of you got sick. i can name a number of other possibilities off the top of my head. you haven't even proved how you know covaids is real yet & are stating there is no other possibility. & you can't see the problem with that. backtracking & compiling data is not proving how you know covaids is a virus caught through the air or off surfaces. you can't claim beliefs to be facts until have proven them to be true
Soooo..... first you say
"yes, personal experience does count." Buuuuttt... when presented with personal experience you add the disclaimer
"... with isolating the virus from an infected person... etc, etc.... blah, blah, blah."
You claim you can (cough)
"name a number of possibilities off the top of your head", as to why several of us would get sick at the same time... off the same social event... with exactly the same symptoms... all exactly as COVID symptoms are described. I see. :rolleyes:
Well... here's
MY disclaimer.
A while back I told you I couldn't give less of a shit whether you believed COVID, masks, vaccines, or not. After that... I stopped trying to talk sense into you... (although I've seen others stubbornly continue to do so).
So don't take this as me trying to get back to trying to convince you of ANYTHING. I was just curious as to what your response would be when actually presented with someone with personal experience.
Predictably, you twisted yourself into a knot trying to sound knowledgeable when in actually you've just further exposed yourself for the fraud you are.
I feel sorry for anyone who actually has to deal with you in real life.
yes personal experience does count when you can prove to know something is true. your experience was only of some of you getting sick. not proof of convid being a virus caught from outside the body through the air or off surfaces. you just believe it was convid. you can't prove to know that to be true. you can't even admit to yourself that you only believe convid is real. you don't know that to be true & your angry because your illusion is being highlighted. if you want to use words like absolutely & facts then you better bring proof of how you know your claims are true to the table
You love saturating your posts with the words "claim", "proof", "facts", "beliefs". But you misuse these words because you don't know the meaning of them. So... as a public service to all... I will proceed to teach you the proper use of these words.
For example...
Beanz claims you're a "very gullible easily led plum."
I disagree with him. "Gullible" means you might actually want to know the truth, but are easily misled or persuaded. So for Beanz to actually prove you're gullible, he would have to establish you actually want to know the truth.
The "plum" part is just Beanz being a nicer human being than I am. Because my own personal claim is that...
TitoFan claims you're a fucking moron.
Now... that's both a claim and a belief. Of course, I would have to prove that.
For starters, there's the gargantuan, global body of scientific evidence that is consistent both through time and space (has never wavered... is universally accepted)... that you so cavalierly wave off without any proof to the contrary.
You demand proof of something, but when presented with just that... you claim it isn't proof, or at least not acceptable to your standards. Thus proving you have no clue of what proof actually constitutes.
You're presented with facts... and you discount those. Thus proving you don't know what "facts" are either.
So we're pretty much on our way to proving the "fucking moron" claim.
Finally... you contradicted yourself horribly when you claimed you would accept personal experience as proof... but when presented with just that... you again dismissed it with nonsensical garbage which no one with a 3rd grade education or higher was able to comprehend.
THIS... my dear dick... er... TIC... is the final nail on the coffin as far as any counterarguments regarding you being a fucking moron.
Oh... and as seen from a boxing thread where you childishly take every comment made literally (even if it's meant to be comparative or figurative)... let me explain that there is no real nail nor any real coffin.
They're just figures of speech... yet another concept I'm pretty sure escapes your atom-sized brain.
Thus... I think we can all conclude that you are, in fact, a fucking moron.
-
Re: Who’s had the vaccine ? Side effects ?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
TitoFan
Quote:
Originally Posted by
TIC
Quote:
Originally Posted by
TitoFan
Quote:
Originally Posted by
TIC
Quote:
Originally Posted by
TitoFan
Quote:
Originally Posted by
TIC
Quote:
Originally Posted by
TitoFan
Hey.
Does personal experience count? Last November, several members of my family and myself attended a social function. Although we had tried to take all the necessary precautions, some of us got sick soon after. We all got sick at the same time... our symptoms were exactly what was being described as COVID symptoms... and fortunately we all came out of it fairly well. My own symptoms lasted about a week and a half. In talking to other people who attended that function, some of them got sick too.
Now... I'm not interested in debating with you about whether it's
"caught from outside the body, through the air or surfaces." You've made it clear you're not interested in what anyone else has to say.
I'll just leave this here to lighten the general mood.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eY7ZX6ngOSs
yes personal experience does count. so not everyone got sick? i'm not interested in debating. i'm interested in knowing. are you saying there are no other possibilities as to why some of you got sick? i'm not interested in what others have to say. i'm interested in what others know to be true
Glad you at least admit that personal experience does count. It would've been worrisome otherwise. Am I saying there are no other possibilities as to why some of us got sick?
Absolutely. The timing... the symptoms... the circumstances. When I've backtracked and compiled all the data from those who actually attended the event... it becomes clear as day.
So... you claim you're "interested" in what others know to be true? Well... here it is. I know the facts to be true. I'll just leave it at that.
personal experience with isolating the virus from an infected person. proving they were infected from outside the body & the using that isolated virus to infect a healthy person from outside the body through the air or off surfaces. not your beliefs on what you think is true. you claim that there is absolutely no other possibility on why some of you got sick. i can name a number of other possibilities off the top of my head. you haven't even proved how you know covaids is real yet & are stating there is no other possibility. & you can't see the problem with that. backtracking & compiling data is not proving how you know covaids is a virus caught through the air or off surfaces. you can't claim beliefs to be facts until have proven them to be true
Soooo..... first you say
"yes, personal experience does count." Buuuuttt... when presented with personal experience you add the disclaimer
"... with isolating the virus from an infected person... etc, etc.... blah, blah, blah."
You claim you can (cough)
"name a number of possibilities off the top of your head", as to why several of us would get sick at the same time... off the same social event... with exactly the same symptoms... all exactly as COVID symptoms are described. I see. :rolleyes:
Well... here's
MY disclaimer.
A while back I told you I couldn't give less of a shit whether you believed COVID, masks, vaccines, or not. After that... I stopped trying to talk sense into you... (although I've seen others stubbornly continue to do so).
So don't take this as me trying to get back to trying to convince you of ANYTHING. I was just curious as to what your response would be when actually presented with someone with personal experience.
Predictably, you twisted yourself into a knot trying to sound knowledgeable when in actually you've just further exposed yourself for the fraud you are.
I feel sorry for anyone who actually has to deal with you in real life.
yes personal experience does count when you can prove to know something is true. your experience was only of some of you getting sick. not proof of convid being a virus caught from outside the body through the air or off surfaces. you just believe it was convid. you can't prove to know that to be true. you can't even admit to yourself that you only believe convid is real. you don't know that to be true & your angry because your illusion is being highlighted. if you want to use words like absolutely & facts then you better bring proof of how you know your claims are true to the table
You love saturating your posts with the words "claim", "proof", "facts", "beliefs". But you misuse these words because you don't know the meaning of them. So... as a public service to all... I will proceed to teach you the proper use of these words.
For example...
Beanz claims you're a "very gullible easily led plum."
I disagree with him.
"Gullible" means you might actually
want to know the truth, but are easily misled or persuaded. So for Beanz to actually
prove you're gullible, he would have to establish you actually
want to know the truth.
The "plum" part is just Beanz being a nicer human being than I am. Because my own personal claim is that...
TitoFan claims you're a fucking moron.
Now... that's both a claim and a belief. Of course, I would have to
prove that.
For starters, there's the gargantuan, global body of scientific evidence that is consistent both through time and space (has never wavered... is universally accepted)... that you so cavalierly wave off without any
proof to the contrary.
You
demand proof of something, but when presented with just that...
you claim it isn't proof, or at least not acceptable to your standards. Thus proving you have no clue of what
proof actually constitutes.
You're presented with
facts... and you discount those. Thus proving you don't know what
"facts" are either.
So we're pretty much on our way to proving the "fucking moron" claim.
Finally... you contradicted yourself horribly
when you claimed you would accept personal experience as proof... but when presented with just that... you again dismissed it with nonsensical garbage which no one with a 3rd grade education or higher was able to comprehend.
THIS... my dear dick... er... TIC... is the final nail on the coffin as far as any counterarguments regarding you being a fucking moron.
Oh... and as seen from a boxing thread where you childishly take every comment made literally (even if it's meant to be comparative or figurative)... let me explain that there is no real nail nor any real coffin.
They're just figures of speech... yet another concept I'm pretty sure escapes your atom-sized brain.
Thus... I think we can all conclude that you are, in fact, a fucking moron.
believing what so called experts say is just you believing them & it's also a fallacy. you have presented no proof or facts to prove your beliefs to be true. i am only interested in personal experience. that is why i keep asking how you know your belief is true. why would you bring up so called experts when i am asking you to prove your belief? you make stupid statements in boxing threads & i highlight them. little chico bean all bent because i won't accept his belief until he can prove it to be true
-
Re: Who’s had the vaccine ? Side effects ?
Ivermectin is now old news. The cool kids are now snorting hydrogen peroxide. Keep scrolling on this one, multiple posts:
https://twitter.com/oneunderscore__/...95300002848769
Worth noting that even these nutcases all believe the virus exists.
-
Re: Who’s had the vaccine ? Side effects ?
Well, we have an "overachieving" nutcase.
-
Re: Who’s had the vaccine ? Side effects ?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Kirkland Laing
what nutcases believe is not you proving your claims to be true
-
Re: Who’s had the vaccine ? Side effects ?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
TIC
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Kirkland Laing
what nutcases believe is not you proving your claims to be true
You can't even tell us all what the difference is between 'Believing and Knowing' so if I were you I would maybe STFU about other people owing you proof of anything.
-
Re: Who’s had the vaccine ? Side effects ?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Beanz
Quote:
Originally Posted by
TIC
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Kirkland Laing
what nutcases believe is not you proving your claims to be true
You can't even tell us all what the difference is between
'Believing and Knowing' so if I were you I would maybe STFU about other people owing you proof of anything.
if you make claims that something is real then you better be able to prove those claims to be true spastic
-
Re: Who’s had the vaccine ? Side effects ?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
TIC
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Beanz
Quote:
Originally Posted by
TIC
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Kirkland Laing
what nutcases believe is not you proving your claims to be true
You can't even tell us all what the difference is between
'Believing and Knowing' so if I were you I would maybe STFU about other people owing you proof of anything.
if you make claims that something is real then you better be able to prove those claims to be true spastic
You do nothing but make claims and have never attempted to prove any of them to be true.
You can't even tell us all what true is and how you would define the difference between knowing something and believing it.
You sound like a fucking bot.
How on earth are we supposed to know that you even exist?
-
Re: Who’s had the vaccine ? Side effects ?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Beanz
Quote:
Originally Posted by
TIC
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Beanz
Quote:
Originally Posted by
TIC
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Kirkland Laing
what nutcases believe is not you proving your claims to be true
You can't even tell us all what the difference is between
'Believing and Knowing' so if I were you I would maybe STFU about other people owing you proof of anything.
if you make claims that something is real then you better be able to prove those claims to be true spastic
You do nothing but make claims and have never attempted to prove any of them to be true.
You can't even tell us all what true is and how you would define the difference between knowing something and believing it.
You sound like a fucking bot.
How on earth are we supposed to know that you even exist?
if i claim something to be real feel free to ask me to prove it to be true. do you really need me to tell you the difference between knowing & believing retard?
-
1 Attachment(s)
Re: Who’s had the vaccine ? Side effects ?
-
Re: Who’s had the vaccine ? Side effects ?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
TIC
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Beanz
Quote:
Originally Posted by
TIC
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Beanz
Quote:
Originally Posted by
TIC
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Kirkland Laing
what nutcases believe is not you proving your claims to be true
You can't even tell us all what the difference is between
'Believing and Knowing' so if I were you I would maybe STFU about other people owing you proof of anything.
if you make claims that something is real then you better be able to prove those claims to be true spastic
You do nothing but make claims and have never attempted to prove any of them to be true.
You can't even tell us all what true is and how you would define the difference between knowing something and believing it.
You sound like a fucking bot.
How on earth are we supposed to know that you even exist?
if i claim something to be real feel free to ask me to prove it to be true. do you really need me to tell you the difference between knowing & believing retard?
Yes of course I would like you to tell me the difference between knowing and believing. Mainly because you do not seem to able to express what you think the difference is yourself.
This is your opportunity to claw back some credibility.
You say things like
"i'm not interested in what others have to say. i'm interested in what others know to be true"
And yet what people have to say is often what they know to be true. Research scientists know things to be true on a much deeper level than you or I ever will, on many, many subjects, because of both a life long study of the subject and the hundreds of years of preceding accumulated knowledge, and from studying the results of studies they have created to test out their hypotheses.
You on the other hand have provided none of us here with any reason to believe that you have any evidence, experience or even very, very basic knowledge to back up all these things you claim to be true.
You can't even answer the simplest of questions on the most basic of common principles of science, philosophy, debate, etc and so you can not be trusted as an authority on anything but bullshit in which you seem to have some expertise.
I will address the
"if i claim something to be real feel free to ask me to prove it to be true"
in the next post.
In the meantime if you could just address this one (Yes I would like you to tell me the difference between knowing and believing). That would be a start to taking you seriously.
-
Re: Who’s had the vaccine ? Side effects ?
Here are a few examples of things you have claimed to be real that you have said we are to feel free to ask you to PROVE to be true.
1. You claimed that a mate got sick after his second shot and went to hospital where they told him he has suffered a heart attack.
PROVE IT
2. You claim that
"convid is a virus caught from outside the body through the air or off surfaces ... i am an example of that claim being false"
PROVE IT
3. You claim you have never had a covid vaccine "never will. never been tested either & never worn a mask... pity i never get sick"
PROVE IT
4. You still have not provided us with any evidence that Manny Pacquiao exists either
-
Re: Who’s had the vaccine ? Side effects ?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
TIC
i still haven't had one & never will. never been tested either & never worn a mask. surely the boogeyman will get me soon. pity i never get sick
Quote:
Originally Posted by
TIC
Quote:
Originally Posted by
TitoFan
Quote:
Originally Posted by
TIC
Quote:
Originally Posted by
TitoFan
Quote:
Originally Posted by
TIC
Quote:
Originally Posted by
ykdadamaja
Got my second Pfizer shot today. Within two weeks I should be fully vaccinated the nurse said. No side effects except for a bit of soreness in my arm, which is not a real side effect unless you are a little whiney bitch!
:cool:
I'm good.
you are right. if you got sick within those two weeks you would be considered unvaxxed. that is some bullshit
Your knowledge of how vaccines work in general is mindboggling.
even you should be able to understand that classing someone as unvaxxed who has had two shots would be a lie chico bean
I know I've touched a nerve when you start with the childish attempts at insults. :D
YOU claimed if he "got sick within those two weeks" that he "would be considered unvaxxed."
THAT is your claim. Where's your PROOF that he would be considered unvaxxed?? Where did you get THAT nugget of wisdom?
Or are you just making shit up as you go along... :rolleyes: ;)
the cdc themselves tell you that you are not considered fully vaxxed until after two weeks after your shots
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/E_YQe43V...jpg&name=large
i can only tell you what i have seen with my own eyes, you will have to confirm it for yourself. had a mate get sick seventy two hours after his second shot. went into hospital. i've seen the paperwork with my own eyes. it lists him as unvaxxed. take it as you will
Quote:
Originally Posted by
TIC
Quote:
Originally Posted by
TitoFan
Quote:
Originally Posted by
TIC
Quote:
Originally Posted by
TitoFan
Quote:
Originally Posted by
TIC
Quote:
Originally Posted by
TitoFan
Quote:
Originally Posted by
TIC
Quote:
Originally Posted by
ykdadamaja
Got my second Pfizer shot today. Within two weeks I should be fully vaccinated the nurse said. No side effects except for a bit of soreness in my arm, which is not a real side effect unless you are a little whiney bitch!
:cool:
I'm good.
you are right. if you got sick within those two weeks you would be considered unvaxxed. that is some bullshit
Your knowledge of how vaccines work in general is mindboggling.
even you should be able to understand that classing someone as unvaxxed who has had two shots would be a lie chico bean
I know I've touched a nerve when you start with the childish attempts at insults. :D
YOU claimed if he "got sick within those two weeks" that he "would be considered unvaxxed."
THAT is your claim. Where's your PROOF that he would be considered unvaxxed?? Where did you get THAT nugget of wisdom?
Or are you just making shit up as you go along... :rolleyes: ;)
the cdc themselves tell you that you are not considered fully vaxxed until after two weeks after your shots
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/E_YQe43V...jpg&name=large
i can only tell you what i have seen with my own eyes, you will have to confirm it for yourself. had a mate get sick seventy two hours after his second shot. went into hospital. i've seen the paperwork with my own eyes. it lists him as unvaxxed. take it as you will
What did your mate get sick with? Out of curiosity.
i wouldn't claim to know but they told him it was a heart attack
those 'CLAIMS' ;)
-
Re: Who’s had the vaccine ? Side effects ?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Beanz
Here are a few examples of things you have claimed to be real that you have said we are to feel free to ask you to PROVE to be true.
1. You claimed that a mate got sick after his second shot and went to hospital where they told him he has suffered a heart attack.
PROVE IT
2. You claim that
"convid is a virus caught from outside the body through the air or off surfaces ... i am an example of that claim being false"
PROVE IT
3. You claim you have never had a covid vaccine "never will. never been tested either & never worn a mask... pity i never get sick"
PROVE IT
4. You still have not provided us with any evidence that Manny Pacquiao exists either
Nearly forgot
5. You claim that I am a spastic and the both Primo and Kirkland are retards
PROOF please :p
-
Re: Who’s had the vaccine ? Side effects ?
He crashed and burned against the colossal body of knowledge and proof that has existed for months, and is UNIVERSALLY ACCEPTED by all the brightest and most educated minds in science and virology.
In addition, he contradicted himself when he (cough) "claimed" he would accept personal experience and then proceeded to NOT do that.
Here's a term I'm pretty sure he's totally unfamiliar with: circumstantial evidence.
There's lots of definitions. Here's one:
Circumstantial evidence is evidence that relies on an inference to connect it to a conclusion of fact—such as a fingerprint at the scene of a crime. By contrast, direct evidence supports the truth of an assertion directly—i.e., without need for any additional evidence or inference. - Wikipedia
When I told him that I and several members of my family had become ill at the same time, following the same social event, with the same symptoms (to each other, and to COVID symptomology), and all had a positive COVID test.... THAT is the classic, textbook definition of circumstantial evidence. By definition, that is PROOF, and it becomes a FACT.
So by contradicting himself, as well as his utter failure to clearly enunciate what he means by CLAIMING that he needs PROOF.... he's pretty well sunk his own leaky, rickety rowboat.
-
Re: Who’s had the vaccine ? Side effects ?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Beanz
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Beanz
Here are a few examples of things you have claimed to be real that you have said we are to feel free to ask you to PROVE to be true.
1. You claimed that a mate got sick after his second shot and went to hospital where they told him he has suffered a heart attack.
PROVE IT
2. You claim that
"convid is a virus caught from outside the body through the air or off surfaces ... i am an example of that claim being false"
PROVE IT
3. You claim you have never had a covid vaccine "never will. never been tested either & never worn a mask... pity i never get sick"
PROVE IT
4. You still have not provided us with any evidence that Manny Pacquiao exists either
Nearly forgot
5. You claim that I am a spastic and the both Primo and Kirkland are retards
PROOF please :p
To be fair , he’s probably right about me! ;D;D;D
In all seriousness, I fucking admire your painstaking research skills to find things our mate has quoted. Personally I wouldn’t bother going to the trouble for the clown.
-
Re: Who’s had the vaccine ? Side effects ?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Beanz
Quote:
Originally Posted by
TIC
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Beanz
Quote:
Originally Posted by
TIC
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Beanz
Quote:
Originally Posted by
TIC
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Kirkland Laing
what nutcases believe is not you proving your claims to be true
You can't even tell us all what the difference is between
'Believing and Knowing' so if I were you I would maybe STFU about other people owing you proof of anything.
if you make claims that something is real then you better be able to prove those claims to be true spastic
You do nothing but make claims and have never attempted to prove any of them to be true.
You can't even tell us all what true is and how you would define the difference between knowing something and believing it.
You sound like a fucking bot.
How on earth are we supposed to know that you even exist?
if i claim something to be real feel free to ask me to prove it to be true. do you really need me to tell you the difference between knowing & believing retard?
Yes of course I would like you to tell me the difference between knowing and believing. Mainly because you do not seem to able to express what you think the difference is yourself.
This is your opportunity to claw back some credibility.
You say things like
"i'm not interested in what others have to say. i'm interested in what others know to be true"
And yet what people have to say is often what they know to be true. Research scientists know things to be true on a much deeper level than you or I ever will, on many, many subjects, because of both a life long study of the subject and the hundreds of years of preceding accumulated knowledge, and from studying the results of studies they have created to test out their hypotheses.
You on the other hand have provided none of us here with any reason to believe that you have any evidence, experience or even very, very basic knowledge to back up all these things you claim to be true.
You can't even answer the simplest of questions on the most basic of common principles of science, philosophy, debate, etc and so you can not be trusted as an authority on anything but bullshit in which you seem to have some expertise.
I will address the
"if i claim something to be real feel free to ask me to prove it to be true"
in the next post.
In the meantime if you could just address this one (Yes I would like you to tell me the difference between knowing and believing). That would be a start to taking you seriously.
you are still talking about other people. i just want you to prove how you know convid is a virus caught from outside the body through the air or off surfaces. you can believe that but i don't
-
Re: Who’s had the vaccine ? Side effects ?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Beanz
Here are a few examples of things you have claimed to be real that you have said we are to feel free to ask you to PROVE to be true.
1. You claimed that a mate got sick after his second shot and went to hospital where they told him he has suffered a heart attack.
PROVE IT
2. You claim that
"convid is a virus caught from outside the body through the air or off surfaces ... i am an example of that claim being false"
PROVE IT
3. You claim you have never had a covid vaccine "never will. never been tested either & never worn a mask... pity i never get sick"
PROVE IT
4. You still have not provided us with any evidence that Manny Pacquiao exists either
seems like a distraction from the question i am asking. why would you need to keep using this tactic if you know something to be real & you want me to know it as well?
-
Re: Who’s had the vaccine ? Side effects ?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
TitoFan
He crashed and burned against the colossal body of knowledge and proof that has existed for months, and is UNIVERSALLY ACCEPTED by all the brightest and most educated minds in science and virology.
In addition, he contradicted himself when he (cough) "claimed" he would accept personal experience and then proceeded to NOT do that.
Here's a term I'm pretty sure he's totally unfamiliar with: circumstantial evidence.
There's lots of definitions. Here's one:
Circumstantial evidence is evidence that relies on an inference to connect it to a conclusion of fact—such as a fingerprint at the scene of a crime. By contrast, direct evidence supports the truth of an assertion directly—i.e., without need for any additional evidence or inference. - Wikipedia
When I told him that I and several members of my family had become ill at the same time, following the same social event, with the same symptoms (to each other, and to COVID symptomology), and all had a positive COVID test.... THAT is the classic, textbook definition of circumstantial evidence. By definition, that is PROOF, and it becomes a FACT.
So by contradicting himself, as well as his utter failure to clearly enunciate what he means by CLAIMING that he needs PROOF.... he's pretty well sunk his own leaky, rickety rowboat.
some people getting sick & being told they have something is not proof of you knowing that convid is a virus caught from outside the body or off surfaces. it is you believing what you have been told. i want your personal experience of how you know convid was the cause. caught from outside the body through the air or off a surface. you can believe that. but i don't & won't until you can prove that to be true
-
Re: Who’s had the vaccine ? Side effects ?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
TIC
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Beanz
Quote:
Originally Posted by
TIC
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Beanz
Quote:
Originally Posted by
TIC
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Beanz
Quote:
Originally Posted by
TIC
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Kirkland Laing
what nutcases believe is not you proving your claims to be true
You can't even tell us all what the difference is between
'Believing and Knowing' so if I were you I would maybe STFU about other people owing you proof of anything.
if you make claims that something is real then you better be able to prove those claims to be true spastic
You do nothing but make claims and have never attempted to prove any of them to be true.
You can't even tell us all what true is and how you would define the difference between knowing something and believing it.
You sound like a fucking bot.
How on earth are we supposed to know that you even exist?
if i claim something to be real feel free to ask me to prove it to be true. do you really need me to tell you the difference between knowing & believing retard?
Yes of course I would like you to tell me the difference between knowing and believing. Mainly because you do not seem to able to express what you think the difference is yourself.
This is your opportunity to claw back some credibility.
You say things like
"i'm not interested in what others have to say. i'm interested in what others know to be true"
And yet what people have to say is often what they know to be true. Research scientists know things to be true on a much deeper level than you or I ever will, on many, many subjects, because of both a life long study of the subject and the hundreds of years of preceding accumulated knowledge, and from studying the results of studies they have created to test out their hypotheses.
You on the other hand have provided none of us here with any reason to believe that you have any evidence, experience or even very, very basic knowledge to back up all these things you claim to be true.
You can't even answer the simplest of questions on the most basic of common principles of science, philosophy, debate, etc and so you can not be trusted as an authority on anything but bullshit in which you seem to have some expertise.
I will address the
"if i claim something to be real feel free to ask me to prove it to be true"
in the next post.
In the meantime if you could just address this one (Yes I would like you to tell me the difference between knowing and believing). That would be a start to taking you seriously.
you are still talking about other people. i just want you to prove how you know convid is a virus caught from outside the body through the air or off surfaces. you can believe that but i don't
No.
I am talking about YOU.
I would like YOU to tell me the difference between knowing and believing.
YOU are the one telling everyone it is of crucial importance, so the least YOU can do, is explain it.
YOU are the one who said
'i'm not interested in what others have to say. i'm interested in what others know to be true"
So it is YOU not other people who needs to explain how someone can know something to be true.
-
Re: Who’s had the vaccine ? Side effects ?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Primo Carnera
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Beanz
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Beanz
Here are a few examples of things you have claimed to be real that you have said we are to feel free to ask you to PROVE to be true.
1. You claimed that a mate got sick after his second shot and went to hospital where they told him he has suffered a heart attack.
PROVE IT
2. You claim that
"convid is a virus caught from outside the body through the air or off surfaces ... i am an example of that claim being false"
PROVE IT
3. You claim you have never had a covid vaccine "never will. never been tested either & never worn a mask... pity i never get sick"
PROVE IT
4. You still have not provided us with any evidence that Manny Pacquiao exists either
Nearly forgot
5. You claim that I am a spastic and the both Primo and Kirkland are retards
PROOF please :p
To be fair , he’s probably right about me! ;D;D;D
In all seriousness, I fucking admire your painstaking research skills to find things our mate has quoted. Personally I wouldn’t bother going to the trouble for the clown.
i don't think i called you a retard. i think seven times larry is a retard. problem is i don't waste my time with him so just dismiss him. i don't care if you believe what i say. i'm not trying to convince anyone that they have to. but we have clowns here still trying to make me believe their fantasy
-
Re: Who’s had the vaccine ? Side effects ?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
TIC
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Beanz
Here are a few examples of things you have claimed to be real that you have said we are to feel free to ask you to PROVE to be true.
1. You claimed that a mate got sick after his second shot and went to hospital where they told him he has suffered a heart attack.
PROVE IT
2. You claim that
"convid is a virus caught from outside the body through the air or off surfaces ... i am an example of that claim being false"
PROVE IT
3. You claim you have never had a covid vaccine "never will. never been tested either & never worn a mask... pity i never get sick"
PROVE IT
4. You still have not provided us with any evidence that Manny Pacquiao exists either
seems like a distraction from the question i am asking. why would you need to keep using this tactic if you know something to be real & you want me to know it as well?
You are the one distracting from the fact that you are again bottling out and running away, after insisting that you would prove anything you claimed to be true.
These are just examples here from this thread to make it really simple and straightforward for you.
It is not a tactic, it is a genuine request to gain an insight into what you think constitutes proof of knowing something to be real.
There are 5 examples for you to work thru methodically and give us all some insight into this amazing level of knowledge that allows you to believe that compared to you everyone else is an idiot.
-
Re: Who’s had the vaccine ? Side effects ?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Beanz
Quote:
Originally Posted by
TIC
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Beanz
Quote:
Originally Posted by
TIC
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Beanz
Quote:
Originally Posted by
TIC
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Beanz
Quote:
Originally Posted by
TIC
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Kirkland Laing
what nutcases believe is not you proving your claims to be true
You can't even tell us all what the difference is between
'Believing and Knowing' so if I were you I would maybe STFU about other people owing you proof of anything.
if you make claims that something is real then you better be able to prove those claims to be true spastic
You do nothing but make claims and have never attempted to prove any of them to be true.
You can't even tell us all what true is and how you would define the difference between knowing something and believing it.
You sound like a fucking bot.
How on earth are we supposed to know that you even exist?
if i claim something to be real feel free to ask me to prove it to be true. do you really need me to tell you the difference between knowing & believing retard?
Yes of course I would like you to tell me the difference between knowing and believing. Mainly because you do not seem to able to express what you think the difference is yourself.
This is your opportunity to claw back some credibility.
You say things like
"i'm not interested in what others have to say. i'm interested in what others know to be true"
And yet what people have to say is often what they know to be true. Research scientists know things to be true on a much deeper level than you or I ever will, on many, many subjects, because of both a life long study of the subject and the hundreds of years of preceding accumulated knowledge, and from studying the results of studies they have created to test out their hypotheses.
You on the other hand have provided none of us here with any reason to believe that you have any evidence, experience or even very, very basic knowledge to back up all these things you claim to be true.
You can't even answer the simplest of questions on the most basic of common principles of science, philosophy, debate, etc and so you can not be trusted as an authority on anything but bullshit in which you seem to have some expertise.
I will address the
"if i claim something to be real feel free to ask me to prove it to be true"
in the next post.
In the meantime if you could just address this one (Yes I would like you to tell me the difference between knowing and believing). That would be a start to taking you seriously.
you are still talking about other people. i just want you to prove how you know convid is a virus caught from outside the body through the air or off surfaces. you can believe that but i don't
No.
I am talking about YOU.
I would like YOU to tell me the difference between knowing and believing.
YOU are the one telling everyone it is of crucial importance, so the least YOU can do, is explain it.
YOU are the one who said
'i'm not interested in what others have to say. i'm interested in what others know to be true"
So it is YOU not other people who needs to explain how someone can know something to be true.
i know you are stupid but you just talked about research scientists in your post. that is not you retard. i don't care what you would like seven times larry. i'm not interested in your belief until you can prove to me how you know it to be true. you can have your belief. i just want no part of it
-
Re: Who’s had the vaccine ? Side effects ?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Beanz
Quote:
Originally Posted by
TIC
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Beanz
Here are a few examples of things you have claimed to be real that you have said we are to feel free to ask you to PROVE to be true.
1. You claimed that a mate got sick after his second shot and went to hospital where they told him he has suffered a heart attack.
PROVE IT
2. You claim that
"convid is a virus caught from outside the body through the air or off surfaces ... i am an example of that claim being false"
PROVE IT
3. You claim you have never had a covid vaccine "never will. never been tested either & never worn a mask... pity i never get sick"
PROVE IT
4. You still have not provided us with any evidence that Manny Pacquiao exists either
seems like a distraction from the question i am asking. why would you need to keep using this tactic if you know something to be real & you want me to know it as well?
You are the one distracting from the fact that you are again bottling out and running away, after insisting that you would prove anything you claimed to be true.
These are just examples here from this thread to make it really simple and straightforward for you.
It is not a tactic, it is a genuine request to gain an insight into what you think constitutes proof of knowing something to be real.
There are 5 examples for you to work thru methodically and give us all some insight into this amazing level of knowledge that allows you to believe that compared to you everyone else is an idiot.
i don't care if you believe me or not. use the information as you will. i'm not trying to convince you. unlike you i don't care if you believe anything i say. unlike you who is angry that i won't buy into your fantasy
