Who’s had the vaccine ? Side effects ?

[Beanz]

Ivermectin is now old news. The cool kids are now snorting hydrogen peroxide. Keep scrolling on this one, multiple posts:



https://twitter.com/oneunderscore__/...95300002848769



Worth noting that even these nutcases all believe the virus exists.

what nutcases believe is not you proving your claims to be true

You can't even tell us all what the difference is between 'Believing and Knowing' so if I were you I would maybe STFU about other people owing you proof of anything.

if you make claims that something is real then you better be able to prove those claims to be true spastic

You do nothing but make claims and have never attempted to prove any of them to be true.

You can't even tell us all what true is and how you would define the difference between knowing something and believing it.

You sound like a fucking bot.

How on earth are we supposed to know that you even exist?

if i claim something to be real feel free to ask me to prove it to be true. do you really need me to tell you the difference between knowing & believing retard?

Yes of course I would like you to tell me the difference between knowing and believing. Mainly because you do not seem to able to express what you think the difference is yourself.

This is your opportunity to claw back some credibility.

You say things like

"i'm not interested in what others have to say. i'm interested in what others know to be true"

And yet what people have to say is often what they know to be true. Research scientists know things to be true on a much deeper level than you or I ever will, on many, many subjects, because of both a life long study of the subject and the hundreds of years of preceding accumulated knowledge, and from studying the results of studies they have created to test out their hypotheses.

You on the other hand have provided none of us here with any reason to believe that you have any evidence, experience or even very, very basic knowledge to back up all these things you claim to be true.

You can't even answer the simplest of questions on the most basic of common principles of science, philosophy, debate, etc and so you can not be trusted as an authority on anything but bullshit in which you seem to have some expertise.


I will address the

"if i claim something to be real feel free to ask me to prove it to be true"

in the next post.

In the meantime if you could just address this one (Yes I would like you to tell me the difference between knowing and believing). That would be a start to taking you seriously.

[Beanz]

Here are a few examples of things you have claimed to be real that you have said we are to feel free to ask you to PROVE to be true.


1. You claimed that a mate got sick after his second shot and went to hospital where they told him he has suffered a heart attack.

PROVE IT

2. You claim that

"convid is a virus caught from outside the body through the air or off surfaces ... i am an example of that claim being false"

PROVE IT

3. You claim you have never had a covid vaccine "never will. never been tested either & never worn a mask... pity i never get sick"

PROVE IT

4. You still have not provided us with any evidence that Manny Pacquiao exists either

[Beanz]

Here are a few examples of things you have claimed to be real that you have said we are to feel free to ask you to PROVE to be true.


1. You claimed that a mate got sick after his second shot and went to hospital where they told him he has suffered a heart attack.

PROVE IT

2. You claim that

"convid is a virus caught from outside the body through the air or off surfaces ... i am an example of that claim being false"

PROVE IT

3. You claim you have never had a covid vaccine "never will. never been tested either & never worn a mask... pity i never get sick"

PROVE IT

4. You still have not provided us with any evidence that Manny Pacquiao exists either

Nearly forgot


5. You claim that I am a spastic and the both Primo and Kirkland are retards


PROOF please

[TitoFan]

He crashed and burned against the colossal body of knowledge and proof that has existed for months, and is UNIVERSALLY ACCEPTED by all the brightest and most educated minds in science and virology.

In addition, he contradicted himself when he (cough) "claimed" he would accept personal experience and then proceeded to NOT do that.

Here's a term I'm pretty sure he's totally unfamiliar with: circumstantial evidence.

There's lots of definitions. Here's one:

Circumstantial evidence is evidence that relies on an inference to connect it to a conclusion of fact—such as a fingerprint at the scene of a crime. By contrast, direct evidence supports the truth of an assertion directly—i.e., without need for any additional evidence or inference. - Wikipedia

When I told him that I and several members of my family had become ill at the same time, following the same social event, with the same symptoms (to each other, and to COVID symptomology), and all had a positive COVID test.... THAT is the classic, textbook definition of circumstantial evidence. By definition, that is PROOF, and it becomes a FACT.

So by contradicting himself, as well as his utter failure to clearly enunciate what he means by CLAIMING that he needs PROOF.... he's pretty well sunk his own leaky, rickety rowboat.

[TIC]

He crashed and burned against the colossal body of knowledge and proof that has existed for months, and is UNIVERSALLY ACCEPTED by all the brightest and most educated minds in science and virology.

In addition, he contradicted himself when he (cough) "claimed" he would accept personal experience and then proceeded to NOT do that.

Here's a term I'm pretty sure he's totally unfamiliar with: circumstantial evidence.

There's lots of definitions. Here's one:

Circumstantial evidence is evidence that relies on an inference to connect it to a conclusion of fact—such as a fingerprint at the scene of a crime. By contrast, direct evidence supports the truth of an assertion directly—i.e., without need for any additional evidence or inference. - Wikipedia

When I told him that I and several members of my family had become ill at the same time, following the same social event, with the same symptoms (to each other, and to COVID symptomology), and all had a positive COVID test.... THAT is the classic, textbook definition of circumstantial evidence. By definition, that is PROOF, and it becomes a FACT.

So by contradicting himself, as well as his utter failure to clearly enunciate what he means by CLAIMING that he needs PROOF.... he's pretty well sunk his own leaky, rickety rowboat.

some people getting sick & being told they have something is not proof of you knowing that convid is a virus caught from outside the body or off surfaces. it is you believing what you have been told. i want your personal experience of how you know convid was the cause. caught from outside the body through the air or off a surface. you can believe that. but i don't & won't until you can prove that to be true

[Primo Carnera]

Here are a few examples of things you have claimed to be real that you have said we are to feel free to ask you to PROVE to be true.


1. You claimed that a mate got sick after his second shot and went to hospital where they told him he has suffered a heart attack.

PROVE IT

2. You claim that

"convid is a virus caught from outside the body through the air or off surfaces ... i am an example of that claim being false"

PROVE IT

3. You claim you have never had a covid vaccine "never will. never been tested either & never worn a mask... pity i never get sick"

PROVE IT

4. You still have not provided us with any evidence that Manny Pacquiao exists either

Nearly forgot


5. You claim that I am a spastic and the both Primo and Kirkland are retards


PROOF please

To be fair , he’s probably right about me!
In all seriousness, I fucking admire your painstaking research skills to find things our mate has quoted. Personally I wouldn’t bother going to the trouble for the clown.

[TIC]

Here are a few examples of things you have claimed to be real that you have said we are to feel free to ask you to PROVE to be true.


1. You claimed that a mate got sick after his second shot and went to hospital where they told him he has suffered a heart attack.

PROVE IT

2. You claim that

"convid is a virus caught from outside the body through the air or off surfaces ... i am an example of that claim being false"

PROVE IT

3. You claim you have never had a covid vaccine "never will. never been tested either & never worn a mask... pity i never get sick"

PROVE IT

4. You still have not provided us with any evidence that Manny Pacquiao exists either

Nearly forgot


5. You claim that I am a spastic and the both Primo and Kirkland are retards


PROOF please

To be fair , he’s probably right about me!
In all seriousness, I fucking admire your painstaking research skills to find things our mate has quoted. Personally I wouldn’t bother going to the trouble for the clown.

i don't think i called you a retard. i think seven times larry is a retard. problem is i don't waste my time with him so just dismiss him. i don't care if you believe what i say. i'm not trying to convince anyone that they have to. but we have clowns here still trying to make me believe their fantasy

[TIC]

Here are a few examples of things you have claimed to be real that you have said we are to feel free to ask you to PROVE to be true.


1. You claimed that a mate got sick after his second shot and went to hospital where they told him he has suffered a heart attack.

PROVE IT

2. You claim that

"convid is a virus caught from outside the body through the air or off surfaces ... i am an example of that claim being false"

PROVE IT

3. You claim you have never had a covid vaccine "never will. never been tested either & never worn a mask... pity i never get sick"

PROVE IT

4. You still have not provided us with any evidence that Manny Pacquiao exists either

seems like a distraction from the question i am asking. why would you need to keep using this tactic if you know something to be real & you want me to know it as well?

[Beanz]

Here are a few examples of things you have claimed to be real that you have said we are to feel free to ask you to PROVE to be true.


1. You claimed that a mate got sick after his second shot and went to hospital where they told him he has suffered a heart attack.

PROVE IT

2. You claim that

"convid is a virus caught from outside the body through the air or off surfaces ... i am an example of that claim being false"

PROVE IT

3. You claim you have never had a covid vaccine "never will. never been tested either & never worn a mask... pity i never get sick"

PROVE IT

4. You still have not provided us with any evidence that Manny Pacquiao exists either

seems like a distraction from the question i am asking. why would you need to keep using this tactic if you know something to be real & you want me to know it as well?

You are the one distracting from the fact that you are again bottling out and running away, after insisting that you would prove anything you claimed to be true.

These are just examples here from this thread to make it really simple and straightforward for you.

It is not a tactic, it is a genuine request to gain an insight into what you think constitutes proof of knowing something to be real.

There are 5 examples for you to work thru methodically and give us all some insight into this amazing level of knowledge that allows you to believe that compared to you everyone else is an idiot.

[TIC]

Here are a few examples of things you have claimed to be real that you have said we are to feel free to ask you to PROVE to be true.


1. You claimed that a mate got sick after his second shot and went to hospital where they told him he has suffered a heart attack.

PROVE IT

2. You claim that

"convid is a virus caught from outside the body through the air or off surfaces ... i am an example of that claim being false"

PROVE IT

3. You claim you have never had a covid vaccine "never will. never been tested either & never worn a mask... pity i never get sick"

PROVE IT

4. You still have not provided us with any evidence that Manny Pacquiao exists either

seems like a distraction from the question i am asking. why would you need to keep using this tactic if you know something to be real & you want me to know it as well?

You are the one distracting from the fact that you are again bottling out and running away, after insisting that you would prove anything you claimed to be true.

These are just examples here from this thread to make it really simple and straightforward for you.

It is not a tactic, it is a genuine request to gain an insight into what you think constitutes proof of knowing something to be real.

There are 5 examples for you to work thru methodically and give us all some insight into this amazing level of knowledge that allows you to believe that compared to you everyone else is an idiot.

i don't care if you believe me or not. use the information as you will. i'm not trying to convince you. unlike you i don't care if you believe anything i say. unlike you who is angry that i won't buy into your fantasy

[Beanz]

when i start making claims that things are real feel free to call me out on it to prove them to be true

[TIC]

when i start making claims that things are real feel free to call me out on it to prove them to be true

they are false equivalencies. you are claiming that it is demonstrable that convid is a virus caught from outside the body through the air or off surfaces. that claim needs to be proven to be true. most of us know people who have been sick & have visited hospitals. number two is a presupposition. assuming convid is real before proving it. people still have the right to not take tests, vaccines or wear masks. men are real & box. all real demonstrable things. your turn. please demonstrate how you isolated the virus from one person & confirmed they were infected from outside the body. then used that isolated virus to infect a healthy person through the air or off surfaces

[Beanz]

Here are a few examples of things you have claimed to be real that you have said we are to feel free to ask you to PROVE to be true.


1. You claimed that a mate got sick after his second shot and went to hospital where they told him he has suffered a heart attack.

PROVE IT

2. You claim that

"convid is a virus caught from outside the body through the air or off surfaces ... i am an example of that claim being false"

PROVE IT

3. You claim you have never had a covid vaccine "never will. never been tested either & never worn a mask... pity i never get sick"

PROVE IT

4. You still have not provided us with any evidence that Manny Pacquiao exists either

seems like a distraction from the question i am asking. why would you need to keep using this tactic if you know something to be real & you want me to know it as well?

You are the one distracting from the fact that you are again bottling out and running away, after insisting that you would prove anything you claimed to be true.

These are just examples here from this thread to make it really simple and straightforward for you.

It is not a tactic, it is a genuine request to gain an insight into what you think constitutes proof of knowing something to be real.

There are 5 examples for you to work thru methodically and give us all some insight into this amazing level of knowledge that allows you to believe that compared to you everyone else is an idiot.

i don't care if you believe me or not. use the information as you will. i'm not trying to convince you. unlike you i don't care if you believe anything i say. unlike you who is angry that i won't buy into your fantasy

The only angry little fella here is you. I am not the one resorting to calling people spastics or retards or chico bean, or any of that childish crap.

The problem is you have not given anyone any information to use for anything. You entire nothing burger is


" there is a difference between knowing and believing "


It is barely one step up from the lyrics to Agadoo when it comes to philosophical insight.

[TIC]

Ivermectin is now old news. The cool kids are now snorting hydrogen peroxide. Keep scrolling on this one, multiple posts:



https://twitter.com/oneunderscore__/...95300002848769



Worth noting that even these nutcases all believe the virus exists.

what nutcases believe is not you proving your claims to be true

You can't even tell us all what the difference is between 'Believing and Knowing' so if I were you I would maybe STFU about other people owing you proof of anything.

if you make claims that something is real then you better be able to prove those claims to be true spastic

You do nothing but make claims and have never attempted to prove any of them to be true.

You can't even tell us all what true is and how you would define the difference between knowing something and believing it.

You sound like a fucking bot.

How on earth are we supposed to know that you even exist?

if i claim something to be real feel free to ask me to prove it to be true. do you really need me to tell you the difference between knowing & believing retard?

Yes of course I would like you to tell me the difference between knowing and believing. Mainly because you do not seem to able to express what you think the difference is yourself.

This is your opportunity to claw back some credibility.

You say things like

"i'm not interested in what others have to say. i'm interested in what others know to be true"

And yet what people have to say is often what they know to be true. Research scientists know things to be true on a much deeper level than you or I ever will, on many, many subjects, because of both a life long study of the subject and the hundreds of years of preceding accumulated knowledge, and from studying the results of studies they have created to test out their hypotheses.

You on the other hand have provided none of us here with any reason to believe that you have any evidence, experience or even very, very basic knowledge to back up all these things you claim to be true.

You can't even answer the simplest of questions on the most basic of common principles of science, philosophy, debate, etc and so you can not be trusted as an authority on anything but bullshit in which you seem to have some expertise.


I will address the

"if i claim something to be real feel free to ask me to prove it to be true"

in the next post.

In the meantime if you could just address this one (Yes I would like you to tell me the difference between knowing and believing). That would be a start to taking you seriously.

you are still talking about other people. i just want you to prove how you know convid is a virus caught from outside the body through the air or off surfaces. you can believe that but i don't

[Beanz]

Ivermectin is now old news. The cool kids are now snorting hydrogen peroxide. Keep scrolling on this one, multiple posts:



https://twitter.com/oneunderscore__/...95300002848769



Worth noting that even these nutcases all believe the virus exists.

what nutcases believe is not you proving your claims to be true

You can't even tell us all what the difference is between 'Believing and Knowing' so if I were you I would maybe STFU about other people owing you proof of anything.

if you make claims that something is real then you better be able to prove those claims to be true spastic

You do nothing but make claims and have never attempted to prove any of them to be true.

You can't even tell us all what true is and how you would define the difference between knowing something and believing it.

You sound like a fucking bot.

How on earth are we supposed to know that you even exist?

if i claim something to be real feel free to ask me to prove it to be true. do you really need me to tell you the difference between knowing & believing retard?

Yes of course I would like you to tell me the difference between knowing and believing. Mainly because you do not seem to able to express what you think the difference is yourself.

This is your opportunity to claw back some credibility.

You say things like

"i'm not interested in what others have to say. i'm interested in what others know to be true"

And yet what people have to say is often what they know to be true. Research scientists know things to be true on a much deeper level than you or I ever will, on many, many subjects, because of both a life long study of the subject and the hundreds of years of preceding accumulated knowledge, and from studying the results of studies they have created to test out their hypotheses.

You on the other hand have provided none of us here with any reason to believe that you have any evidence, experience or even very, very basic knowledge to back up all these things you claim to be true.

You can't even answer the simplest of questions on the most basic of common principles of science, philosophy, debate, etc and so you can not be trusted as an authority on anything but bullshit in which you seem to have some expertise.


I will address the

"if i claim something to be real feel free to ask me to prove it to be true"

in the next post.

In the meantime if you could just address this one (Yes I would like you to tell me the difference between knowing and believing). That would be a start to taking you seriously.

you are still talking about other people. i just want you to prove how you know convid is a virus caught from outside the body through the air or off surfaces. you can believe that but i don't

No.

I am talking about YOU.

I would like YOU to tell me the difference between knowing and believing.

YOU are the one telling everyone it is of crucial importance, so the least YOU can do, is explain it.

YOU are the one who said


'i'm not interested in what others have to say. i'm interested in what others know to be true"


So it is YOU not other people who needs to explain how someone can know something to be true.