Re: Looking back at old controversial fights.... (Updated) Whitaker vs. Chavez
Quote:
Originally Posted by CutMeMicK
Quote:
Originally Posted by Starr
Post the fight but Chavez got dominated
My love, I posted the fight for those who would like to contribute to the thread and don't have the fight or have it but would make it easier to view the fight in the thread as you can type your rd. by rd. as your watching the fight.
But you knew that those were my intentions right? :)
I was saying for you to post the fight and then making my opinion that chavez got dominated. You understood that right ???
Re: Looking back at old controversial fights.... (Updated) Whitaker vs. Chavez
Quote:
Originally Posted by Starr
Quote:
Originally Posted by CutMeMicK
Quote:
Originally Posted by Starr
Post the fight but Chavez got dominated
My love, I posted the fight for those who would like to contribute to the thread and don't have the fight or have it but would make it easier to view the fight in the thread as you can type your rd. by rd. as your watching the fight.
But you knew that those were my intentions right? :)
I was saying for you to post the fight and then making my opinion that chavez got dominated. You understood that right ???
You do realise the 'but' part in your comment insinuates that I was posting the fight because I think JCC won.
When you use the word 'but' it's a continues word that follows with another statement to implement the previous one.
Anyway!!!
I see Violent Demise scored rd. 1 even, come on VD. That was no even rds. JCC landed the harder punches and pushed Pernell back through the rd. Pernell got in some really good jabs and moved well but JCC lande harder cleaner shots....
Re: Looking back at old controversial fights.... (Updated) Whitaker vs. Chavez
Quote:
Originally Posted by CutMeMicK
Quote:
Originally Posted by Starr
Quote:
Originally Posted by CutMeMicK
Quote:
Originally Posted by Starr
Post the fight but Chavez got dominated
My love, I posted the fight for those who would like to contribute to the thread and don't have the fight or have it but would make it easier to view the fight in the thread as you can type your rd. by rd. as your watching the fight.
But you knew that those were my intentions right? :)
I was saying for you to post the fight and then making my opinion that chavez got dominated. You understood that right ???
You do realise the 'but' part in your comment insinuates that I was posting the fight because I think JCC won.
When you use the word 'but' it's a continues word that follows with another statement to implement the previous one.
Anyway!!!
I see Violent Demise scored rd. 1 even, come on VD. That was no even rds. JCC landed the harder punches and pushed Pernell back through the rd. Pernell got in some really good jabs and moved well but JCC lande harder cleaner shots....
would it have made you feel better if I said 'but anyway' instead of 'but' ???
Re: Looking back at old controversial fights.... (Updated) Whitaker vs. Chavez
Quote:
Originally Posted by Starr
Quote:
Originally Posted by CutMeMicK
Quote:
Originally Posted by Starr
Quote:
Originally Posted by CutMeMicK
Quote:
Originally Posted by Starr
Post the fight but Chavez got dominated
My love, I posted the fight for those who would like to contribute to the thread and don't have the fight or have it but would make it easier to view the fight in the thread as you can type your rd. by rd. as your watching the fight.
But you knew that those were my intentions right? :)
I was saying for you to post the fight and then making my opinion that chavez got dominated. You understood that right ???
You do realise the 'but' part in your comment insinuates that I was posting the fight because I think JCC won.
When you use the word 'but' it's a continues word that follows with another statement to implement the previous one.
Anyway!!!
I see Violent Demise scored rd. 1 even, come on VD. That was no even rds. JCC landed the harder punches and pushed Pernell back through the rd. Pernell got in some really good jabs and moved well but JCC lande harder cleaner shots....
would it have made you feel better if I said 'but anyway' instead of 'but' ???
So you do understand....
I knew you would. ;)
Re: Looking back at old controversial fights.... (Updated) Whitaker vs. Chavez
Quote:
Originally Posted by CutMeMicK
Quote:
Originally Posted by Starr
Quote:
Originally Posted by CutMeMicK
Quote:
Originally Posted by Starr
Quote:
Originally Posted by CutMeMicK
Quote:
Originally Posted by Starr
Post the fight but Chavez got dominated
My love, I posted the fight for those who would like to contribute to the thread and don't have the fight or have it but would make it easier to view the fight in the thread as you can type your rd. by rd. as your watching the fight.
But you knew that those were my intentions right? :)
I was saying for you to post the fight and then making my opinion that chavez got dominated. You understood that right ???
You do realise the 'but' part in your comment insinuates that I was posting the fight because I think JCC won.
When you use the word 'but' it's a continues word that follows with another statement to implement the previous one.
Anyway!!!
I see Violent Demise scored rd. 1 even, come on VD. That was no even rds. JCC landed the harder punches and pushed Pernell back through the rd. Pernell got in some really good jabs and moved well but JCC lande harder cleaner shots....
would it have made you feel better if I said 'but anyway' instead of 'but' ???
So you do understand....
I knew you would. ;)
of course I understand. I just delay it to up your post count :)
Re: Looking back at old controversial fights.... (Updated) Whitaker vs. Chavez
Quote:
Originally Posted by Starr
Quote:
Originally Posted by CutMeMicK
Quote:
Originally Posted by Starr
Quote:
Originally Posted by CutMeMicK
Quote:
Originally Posted by Starr
Quote:
Originally Posted by CutMeMicK
Quote:
Originally Posted by Starr
Post the fight but Chavez got dominated
My love, I posted the fight for those who would like to contribute to the thread and don't have the fight or have it but would make it easier to view the fight in the thread as you can type your rd. by rd. as your watching the fight.
But you knew that those were my intentions right? :)
I was saying for you to post the fight and then making my opinion that chavez got dominated. You understood that right ???
You do realise the 'but' part in your comment insinuates that I was posting the fight because I think JCC won.
When you use the word 'but' it's a continues word that follows with another statement to implement the previous one.
Anyway!!!
I see Violent Demise scored rd. 1 even, come on VD. That was no even rds. JCC landed the harder punches and pushed Pernell back through the rd. Pernell got in some really good jabs and moved well but JCC lande harder cleaner shots....
would it have made you feel better if I said 'but anyway' instead of 'but' ???
So you do understand....
I knew you would. ;)
of course I understand. I just delay it to up your post count :)
Thanks and I know what you meant from the begining. I just wanted to up you cool click count.
CC#1132 for you.....
Re: Looking back at old controversial fights.... (Updated) Whitaker vs. Chavez
Re: Looking back at old controversial fights.... (Updated) Whitaker vs. Chavez
Quote:
Originally Posted by brazilianbomber
Quote:
Originally Posted by p4pking
There is nothing contraversial about this fight aside from the blatant robbery. I may go back and watch this again but I have seen it many times and maybe it's simply my taste, but I saw no possible way to give Chavez more than 2 rounds. I believe the 2nd and maybe the 12th. Whittaker dominated some rounds so badly it was tempting to score them 10-8 even though he never hurt Chavez. But anyways my score was 118-110. It was a complete robbery any way anyone could slice it.
I agree, we should not even waste our time scoring this fight.
Agreed. The decision was a disgrace.
Re: Looking back at old controversial fights.... (Updated) Whitaker vs. Chavez
think were pretty much agreed here whitaker was robbed whats next fight sweetpea
Re: Looking back at old controversial fights.... (Updated) Whitaker vs. Chavez
Quote:
Originally Posted by CutMeMicK
Julio C. Chavez vs. Pernell Whitaker
:coolclick: #1074 excellent work Mick! O0
Re: Looking back at old controversial fights.... (Updated) Whitaker vs. Chavez
Whitaker -vs- Chavez
Round 01- Chavez
Round 02- Chavez
Round 03- Whitaker
Round 04- Whitaker
Round 05- Chavez
Round 06- Whitaker
Round 07- Whitaker
Round 08- Whitaker
Round 09- Whitaker
Round 10- Whitaker
Round 11- Whitaker
Round 12- Chavez
Score
Whitaker 116
JCC 112 O0
Re: Looking back at old controversial fights.... (Updated) Whitaker vs. Chavez
117-111 Sweet Pea.
Chavez winning rounds 1,2 and 12, Whitaker the rest. Quite a few rounds were close though and could have gone either way. Under any interpretation though, its hard to see Chavez deserving a draw.
Re: Looking back at old controversial fights.... (Updated) Whitaker vs. Chavez
July 16, 2005. Bernard Hopkins (46-2-1, 32 KO) vs. Jermain Taylor (23-0, 17 KO) for Hopkins' Undisputed Middleweight Title. This was Hopkins' 21st defense of his title.
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | total
Taylor | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 9 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 9 | 9 | 9 | 9 | 115
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXXXXXX
Hopkins| 9 | 9 | 9 | 10 | 10| 9 | 9 | 9 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10| 114
Re: Looking back at old controversial fights.... (Updated) Whitaker vs. Chavez
Quote:
Originally Posted by SweetPea
July 16, 2005. Bernard Hopkins (46-2-1, 32 KO) vs. Jermain Taylor (23-0, 17 KO) for Hopkins' Undisputed Middleweight Title. This was Hopkins' 21st defense of his title.
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | total
Taylor | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 9 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 9 | 9 | 9 | 9 | 115
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXXXXXX
Hopkins| 9 | 9 | 9 | 10 | 10| 9 | 9 | 9 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10| 114
never seen this fight ill download it later and tell you my score tommorow
Re: Looking back at old controversial fights.... (Updated) Hopkins vs. Taylor I
On first viewing I had it a draw, but when I rewatched it recently I had Taylor taking it by a point.
115-114. Taylor taking rounds 1,2,4,6,7 and 8. Hopkins taking rounds 5,9,10,11 and 12. I had round 3 even. A case can be made for Hopkins winning the third, in which case, its a draw on my card.
