Teddy Atlas weighs in and ensures Hatton's defeat

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Quinito

Good lord. I just saw the weigh-in for the first time. Hatton looked like a freaking Aushwitz scapee. I really don't think he'll be the stronger guy tonight. I think he's the one who's going down from the body shot.

---

Hatton will be significantly heavier than Manny. You do know that, right? :rolleyes:

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by miles

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Quinito

Good lord. I just saw the weigh-in for the first time. Hatton looked like a freaking Aushwitz scapee. I really don't think he'll be the stronger guy tonight. I think he's the one who's going down from the body shot.

---

Hatton will be significantly heavier than Manny. You do know that, right? :rolleyes:

---

yeah but not all the time. Heavier don't always mean stronger.

Oumafan, I saw the Atlas review on ESPN about an hour ago, and you are distorting what Atlas said.

For starters, he did not say categorically that Hatton would win. Also, he did not state as fact that it is a problem that Pacquiao came in at 138, but did SUGGEST it as an issue. He also pointed out that Manny may have been getting complacent after the DLH win---and what pacman fan would not be concerned about the terrible crowds and hollywood stars coming to the wildcard gym to see him? Lastly, toward the end of his review, Atlas made a comment to the effect, paraphrasing, "Hatton will have to be real clever/serious, because he's the underdog for a reason."

It is really important not to distort what people say, intrinsically and because then it starts some silly thread based on distortion.

OUMAFAN, if this is true. Then you really suck! ;)

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by sweet science

Oumafan, I saw the Atlas review on ESPN about an hour ago, and you are distorting what Atlas said.

For starters, he did not say categorically that Hatton would win. Also, he did not state as fact that it is a problem that Pacquiao came in at 138, but did SUGGEST it as an issue. He also pointed out that Manny may have been getting complacent after the DLH win---and what pacman fan would not be concerned about the terrible crowds and hollywood stars coming to the wildcard gym to see him? Lastly, toward the end of his review, Atlas made a comment to the effect, paraphrasing, "Hatton will have to be real clever/serious, because he's the underdog for a reason."

It is really important not to distort what people say, intrinsically and because then it starts some silly thread based on distortion.

---

Atlas's Lawyer ^^^^^^

Don't worry, we were just kidding about the impending lawsuit's ;D

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by sweet science

Oumafan, I saw the Atlas review on ESPN about an hour ago, and you are distorting what Atlas said.

For starters, he did not say categorically that Hatton would win. Also, he did not state as fact that it is a problem that Pacquiao came in at 138, but did SUGGEST it as an issue. He also pointed out that Manny may have been getting complacent after the DLH win---and what pacman fan would not be concerned about the terrible crowds and hollywood stars coming to the wildcard gym to see him? Lastly, toward the end of his review, Atlas made a comment to the effect, paraphrasing, "Hatton will have to be real clever/serious, because he's the underdog for a reason."

It is really important not to distort what people say, intrinsically and because then it starts some silly thread based on distortion.

---

Thanks for clarifying that sweet. ;D

Thats ball game,the kiss of death.....Poor Manny :cwm13:

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Deanrw

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by sweet science

Oumafan, I saw the Atlas review on ESPN about an hour ago, and you are distorting what Atlas said.

For starters, he did not say categorically that Hatton would win. Also, he did not state as fact that it is a problem that Pacquiao came in at 138, but did SUGGEST it as an issue. He also pointed out that Manny may have been getting complacent after the DLH win---and what pacman fan would not be concerned about the terrible crowds and hollywood stars coming to the wildcard gym to see him? Lastly, toward the end of his review, Atlas made a comment to the effect, paraphrasing, "Hatton will have to be real clever/serious, because he's the underdog for a reason."

It is really important not to distort what people say, intrinsically and because then it starts some silly thread based on distortion.

---

Atlas's Lawyer ^^^^^^

Don't worry, we were just kidding about the impending lawsuit's ;D

---

Lol. Actually I always liked Atlas, but here of course the point is being accurate in quoting people in the boxing world. Without that we are talking pure bullshit.

Enjoy the fight man, let's hope it goes a good few rounds.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by sweet science

Oumafan, I saw the Atlas review on ESPN about an hour ago, and you are distorting what Atlas said.

For starters, he did not say categorically that Hatton would win. Also, he did not state as fact that it is a problem that Pacquiao came in at 138, but did SUGGEST it as an issue. He also pointed out that Manny may have been getting complacent after the DLH win---and what pacman fan would not be concerned about the terrible crowds and hollywood stars coming to the wildcard gym to see him? Lastly, toward the end of his review, Atlas made a comment to the effect, paraphrasing, "Hatton will have to be real clever/serious, because he's the underdog for a reason."

It is really important not to distort what people say, intrinsically and because then it starts some silly thread based on distortion.

---

LOL, you guys took this thread way too seriously, Miles this was not a Pachugger thread this was a I think Teddy's crazy thread, before every big fight somebody, not just me, comments on how Teddy's picks are the kiss of death. Eastside ;D

And "For starters, he did not say categorically that Hatton would win"

Well, he picked him to win ;D

And "Also, he did not state as fact that it is a problem that Pacquiao came in at 138, but did SUGGEST it as an issue"

I know he said it was a red flag, that's why I said on the original post that he "implied" that it might be an issue.