Re: How did they get that scoring?
I missed a few of the early rounds because i fell asleep, but i felt after the 5th round RJJ was doing quite well. H landed some clean right hand leads, i also felt he won some of the later rounds, to be honest i didn't think B-Hop looked better than RJJ.
He was just that bit more active and willing, but from what i saw it looked closer than the scorecards suggested, and good on RJJ for making it competitive. Because B-Hop should of had atleast 2 points deducted for some of his antics.
Re: How did they get that scoring?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
ICB
I missed a few of the early rounds because i fell asleep, but i felt after the 5th round RJJ was doing quite well. H landed some clean right hand leads, i also felt he won some of the later rounds, to be honest i didn't think B-Hop looked better than RJJ.
He was just that bit more active and willing, but from what i saw it looked closer than the scorecards suggested, and good on RJJ for making it competitive. Because B-Hop should of had atleast 2 points deducted for some of his antics.
Seems like everytime Hopkins has to fight a bit these days he resorts to some shite acting display. Was it anything like Calzaghe vs Hopkins? I remember one of the times he complained in that fight for low blows I was thinking I could have literally flicked him harder than Joe hit him below the belt. Hopkins is not a good advertisment for brands making the foul protector (cup).
Re: How did they get that scoring?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
rjj tszyu
Quote:
Originally Posted by
ICB
I missed a few of the early rounds because i fell asleep, but i felt after the 5th round RJJ was doing quite well. H landed some clean right hand leads, i also felt he won some of the later rounds, to be honest i didn't think B-Hop looked better than RJJ.
He was just that bit more active and willing, but from what i saw it looked closer than the scorecards suggested, and good on RJJ for making it competitive. Because B-Hop should of had atleast 2 points deducted for some of his antics.
Seems like everytime Hopkins has to fight a bit these days he resorts to some shite acting display. Was it anything like Calzaghe vs Hopkins? I remember one of the times he complained in that fight for low blows I was thinking I could have literally flicked him harder than Joe hit him below the belt. Hopkins is not a good advertisment for brands making the foul protector (cup).
Yes it was like that but even worse, at one point in the fight. Bernard Hopkins hit RJJ quite hard with a rabbit shot, so RJJ does it back to him. But its clearly a tap, yet B-Hop goes to the floor for 2 minutes. It was ridiculous, and he only done that because he was fading late.
Re: How did they get that scoring?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
ICB
Quote:
Originally Posted by
rjj tszyu
Quote:
Originally Posted by
ICB
I missed a few of the early rounds because i fell asleep, but i felt after the 5th round RJJ was doing quite well. H landed some clean right hand leads, i also felt he won some of the later rounds, to be honest i didn't think B-Hop looked better than RJJ.
He was just that bit more active and willing, but from what i saw it looked closer than the scorecards suggested, and good on RJJ for making it competitive. Because B-Hop should of had atleast 2 points deducted for some of his antics.
Seems like everytime Hopkins has to fight a bit these days he resorts to some shite acting display. Was it anything like Calzaghe vs Hopkins? I remember one of the times he complained in that fight for low blows I was thinking I could have literally flicked him harder than Joe hit him below the belt. Hopkins is not a good advertisment for brands making the foul protector (cup).
Yes it was like that but even worse, at one point in the fight. Bernard Hopkins hit RJJ quite hard with a rabbit shot, so RJJ does it back to him. But its clearly a tap, yet B-Hop goes to the floor for 2 minutes. It was ridiculous, and he only done that because he was fading late.
Sounds a lot like the Calzaghe fight then.
Re: How did they get that scoring?
The Calzaghe fightx3, but apparently Hopkins went to the hospital afterwards.
Re: How did they get that scoring?
I remember like only 1 or 2 right crosses Jones landed flush. Roy wasn't even trying to win rounds in there! I doubt he even argued he won the fight or even came close. Hopkins was the only guy actually winning rounds and he was punching and forcing the fight a lot more then Jones. Dirty as fuck yes, but he clearly won about every round as Roy wasn't even trying to win rounds.
Re: How did they get that scoring?
Roy Jones landed way more than 1 or 2 clean right hands. Hopkins would come forward once or twice a round with vigor, but most of the time it was with meaningless punches that Roy blocked for the most part.
I thought Roy should kept on throw that right hook to the body there was no way for Hopkins to get out of the way of it.
Re: How did they get that scoring?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Nameless
Quote:
Originally Posted by
JazMerkin
I only gave Roy 2 rounds, he did seem like he was just trying to survive. Shit fight, the only positive thing that can be said is it wasn't as bad as their first one.
Well I am not sure there, with all the dirty stuff and Cirque du Soleil prowess by Hopkins, it was a show of an epic size WWE-wise.
I second that, usually I root for the American fighters but Bernard embarrassed himself with all that acting…. A pathetic show and a big robbery….