Hahaha that is the question buddy!Quote:
Originally Posted by ono
I take it you'd fight a Klitschko for free?Quote:
Originally Posted by ElTerribleMorales
Printable View
Hahaha that is the question buddy!Quote:
Originally Posted by onoI take it you'd fight a Klitschko for free?Quote:
Originally Posted by ElTerribleMorales
I dont think that is the question really. Now it is probably not a good idea for Haye to fight a Klit for free, and if that was going to happen then fine. Dont make up shit about being injured tho, just say the deal fell thru and u werent getting paid. No matter how u spin it Haye has had contracts with both Klits and hasn't managed to fight either yet.Quote:
Originally Posted by KelHahaha that is the question buddy!Quote:
Originally Posted by onoI take it you'd fight a Klitschko for free?Quote:
Originally Posted by ElTerribleMorales
It is ridiculous to ask El Terrible if he would fight Klit for free, because he is not a world class boxer/athlete like Haye is. El Terrible has also not told the media he would beat the Klits easily, and that he would fight them for free as Haye has done in the past.
I believe Haye is as good a chance as anyone to beat the Klits but i cant see him doing it.
This is not the same Wlad that fought Corrie Sanders. Wlad would have KOd sanders in that fight if he used his current technique. Haye talks the talk about going after Wlad and using speed to KO him but when Haye eats that first jab, he will realize Wlad aint no joke......
I say Wlad brutal KO (ala Calvin Brock) round number 7.
Fight will be signed by the end of may.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hornfinger
Do you know something i don't? ;D
I don't think you're getting it. Setanta was the source of income for this fight for Haye. He wasn't getting much if anything from the gate receipts or anything from any other tv broadcast. Only Setanta, because that's the deal the Klitschko's team put on the table.Quote:
Originally Posted by ElTerribleMoralesshouldn't of faked a back injury and use that as his excuse now should he?Quote:
Originally Posted by smashupQuote:
Originally Posted by ElTerribleMorales
"Bitch out" ?
He pulled out because he wasn't going to get paid.
This'll happen 100%
well i'm not the one walking around talking shit and throwing out golden lines like "i'd fight him (Wlad) for free", as i said over and over, if Haye was a big as a name in the UK he shouldn't have had a problem making sales and getting paidQuote:
Originally Posted by onoI take it you'd fight a Klitschko for free?Quote:
Originally Posted by ElTerribleMorales
Given he still has to pay training expenses etc, unless he was going to stand outside the stadium in Schalke selling t-shirts, he wasn't going to get paid for the fight. It doesn't matter how popular he is, because the only company that were really paying him went bankrupt.
So, please explain to me where he could 'make sales and get paid?'
He wouldn't have legally been allowed to disclose information about Setanta at the time, hence the fake injury.Quote:
Originally Posted by eagleI dont think that is the question really. Now it is probably not a good idea for Haye to fight a Klit for free, and if that was going to happen then fine. Dont make up shit about being injured tho, just say the deal fell thru and u werent getting paid. No matter how u spin it Haye has had contracts with both Klits and hasn't managed to fight either yet.Quote:
Originally Posted by KelHahaha that is the question buddy!Quote:
Originally Posted by ono
It is ridiculous to ask El Terrible if he would fight Klit for free, because he is not a world class boxer/athlete like Haye is. El Terrible has also not told the media he would beat the Klits easily, and that he would fight them for free as Haye has done in the past.
I believe Haye is as good a chance as anyone to beat the Klits but i cant see him doing it.
Well has he now come out and apologised for lying?Quote:
Originally Posted by onoHe wouldn't have legally been allowed to disclose information about Setanta at the time, hence the fake injury.Quote:
Originally Posted by eagleI dont think that is the question really. Now it is probably not a good idea for Haye to fight a Klit for free, and if that was going to happen then fine. Dont make up shit about being injured tho, just say the deal fell thru and u werent getting paid. No matter how u spin it Haye has had contracts with both Klits and hasn't managed to fight either yet.Quote:
Originally Posted by Kel
It is ridiculous to ask El Terrible if he would fight Klit for free, because he is not a world class boxer/athlete like Haye is. El Terrible has also not told the media he would beat the Klits easily, and that he would fight them for free as Haye has done in the past.
I believe Haye is as good a chance as anyone to beat the Klits but i cant see him doing it.
Why does he have to? If he confirms he was lying, people are going to be skeptical if he has to pull out of another fight.Quote:
Originally Posted by eagleWell has he now come out and apologised for lying?Quote:
Originally Posted by onoHe wouldn't have legally been allowed to disclose information about Setanta at the time, hence the fake injury.Quote:
Originally Posted by eagle
Plus it matters little anyway. He went away, travelled to Germany to pick up a belt. Defended it in an exciting fight in a sold out, 20,000 capacity arena. Now he has more power at the negotiating table, and negotiations are under way for the fight. I don't see what he's got to aplogise for.
Does it really fucking matter??Quote:
Originally Posted by eagleWell has he now come out and apologised for lying?Quote:
Originally Posted by onoHe wouldn't have legally been allowed to disclose information about Setanta at the time, hence the fake injury.Quote:
Originally Posted by eagle
We have a potential superfight in the HW division set to be signed in the next month and your bitching about little details that happened last year.
Haye is on board with Sky now and is the biggest named sports star in Britain at the minute, he has absolutley nothing to pull out for again and the fight WILL go ahead this time as long as the Klits don't demand 12 fucking rematches.
Why not whine about them circumstances instead of Hayes faults for once?? I've never heard anything like it..... "If you (haye) beat Wlad you must then fight his brother and then fight Wlad and then fight Vitali again". If that had happened none of them would have held a title by the end of it. It was pathetic.
Exactly, i love how nobody seems arsed that Klitschko demanded a rematch, plus a fight with Vitali (for Haye), aswell as 100% of the gate receipts, and 100% of the non-British tv broadcasts.Quote:
Originally Posted by rjj tszyuDoes it really fucking matter??Quote:
Originally Posted by eagleWell has he now come out and apologised for lying?Quote:
Originally Posted by ono
We have a potential superfight in the HW division set to be signed in the next month and your bitching about little details that happened last year.
Haye is on board with Sky now and is the biggest named sports star in Britain at the minute, he has absolutley nothing to pull out for again and the fight WILL go ahead this time as long as the Klits don't demand 12 fucking rematches.
Why not whine about them circumstances instead of Hayes faults for once?? I've never heard anything like it..... "If you (haye) beat Wlad you must then fight his brother and then fight Wlad and then fight Vitali again". If that had happened none of them would have held a title by the end of it. It was pathetic.
I mean you could even make a case for Klitschko not really wanting the fight. I'm not going to because it's boring and in any case, they're negotiating again anyway. What will be will be.
I'd rather he fought Vitali first, I think he beats him and in style. Wlad on the other hand is just too skilled & disciplined and I can only see it ending badly for him sadly.
Yes....but nothing related to this fight!Quote:
Originally Posted by smashupDo you know something i don't? ;DQuote:
Originally Posted by Hornfinger
Personally, I reckon the WladHaye unification is inevitable in terms of the interest in the fight, and the lack of credible opposition for the Klitschko's mean it's the obvious fight to make.
They can continue making the same Klitschko fights until they retire, but it will be a big challenge ducked if neither brother faces Haye, even if it is just to beat him from behind the jab.
[quote=rjj tszyu;869808]That's debatable.Quote:
Originally Posted by eagle
Probably the biggest boxing star from the UK (I'd still speculate that Mayweather & maybe Pacquiao are bigger here), but he's nowhere near the level of any of the top name footballers. In terms of name recognition, I reckon he's still below a few of the rugby and cricket players as well.Quote:
Originally Posted by rjj tszyuDoes it really fucking matter??Quote:
Originally Posted by eagleWell has he now come out and apologised for lying?Quote:
Originally Posted by ono
We have a potential superfight in the HW division set to be signed in the next month and your bitching about little details that happened last year.
Haye is on board with Sky now and is the biggest named sports star in Britain at the minute, he has absolutley nothing to pull out for again and the fight WILL go ahead this time as long as the Klits don't demand 12 fucking rematches.
Why not whine about them circumstances instead of Hayes faults for once?? I've never heard anything like it..... "If you (haye) beat Wlad you must then fight his brother and then fight Wlad and then fight Vitali again". If that had happened none of them would have held a title by the end of it. It was pathetic.