Not a ROBBERY Please look :D

A better question, rather than asking whether it was a robbery, would be to ask people whether they believe the judges acted fairly and impartially without bias towards the 'money' fighter.

Can anyone truly say they believe that??

Perhaps we shouldn't class a fight like this as a robbery, similar to Sturm/Macklin and many other competitive fights with controversial scores favouring the home or bigger name fighter (Williams/Lara excluded as that fight was not even close). In that case, we clearly require an entirely new word for a fight where the judges have already decided the winner before the first bell sounds and manipulate their scorecards accordingly.

Had Pac fought Marquez' fight he would have won a convincing UD.

Can we all agree Marquez looked FANTASTIC at welterweight?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Prosinecki

Had Pac fought Marquez' fight he would have won a convincing UD.

---

Pacquiao obliged by attacking all the time. That is playing to JMM's strength. the judges rewarded him for doing that.


a good letter for Juan

Dear Juan Manuel Marquez | Michael D. Sellers

This thread makes me want to fart violently on every single person who think that it wasn't a clear victory for JMM.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Nameless

This thread makes me want to fart violently on every single person who think that it wasn't a clear victory for JMM.

---

That sounds like you want to be poetic or something. do you have 7 clear rounds for marquez?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Rantcatrat

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Fenster

miron_lang that is a truly BRILLIANT post.

Impossible to argue against.

How can it possibly be a robbery if everyone is scoring rounds differently?

Great stuff.

---

I for once 100% agree with Fenster. It's difficult to argue that it was a robbery when 5 Saddo Posters scored so many rounds differently. It's clear as day the fight was close.

---

For once? We don't disagree on that much surely?

Nothing more pathetic in boxing than people crying "robbery" then producing CLOSE scorecards :rolleyes:

psl, u dont know shit about boxing period. I know ur also a pactard troll from esb and boxingscrne cuz u sound just like them. Buncha annoying ass bums who dont know shit.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Nameless

This thread makes me want to fart violently on every single person who think that it wasn't a clear victory for JMM.

---

This thread unequivocally proves it wasn't a robbery.

Whether you/we think Marquez won or not is irrelevant. The facts are people were undecided on virtually EVERY round.

How can it possibly be a robbery if people can't even agree on who won what rounds? Utterly hilarious.

i still havent seen the fight

but the bit about the expectation on pac rings true to me

everyone was saying he was gonna blast marquez, he obviously didnt and marquez's performace was a suprise, which perhaps gave him a few more points in peoples eyes

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by erics44

i still havent seen the fight

but the bit about the expectation on pac rings true to me

everyone was saying he was gonna blast marquez, he obviously didnt and marquez's performace was a suprise, which perhaps gave him a few more points in peoples eyes

---

No eric. It was a classic robjob and even 95% of other elite boxers out there agree.

U gotta watch the fight first before commenting.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by FinitoElDinamita

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by erics44

i still havent seen the fight

but the bit about the expectation on pac rings true to me

everyone was saying he was gonna blast marquez, he obviously didnt and marquez's performace was a suprise, which perhaps gave him a few more points in peoples eyes

---

No eric. It was a classic robjob and even 95% of other elite boxers out there agree.

U gotta watch the fight first before commenting.

---

youre probly right

id like to watch it too but i cant find anywhere i can without paying for it

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by FinitoElDinamita

psl, u dont know shit about boxing period. I know ur also a pactard troll from esb and boxingscrne cuz u sound just like them. Buncha annoying ass bums who dont know shit.

---

Fukk you Milmascaras. And quit pretending like you're Korean. It's rediculous.

I hope they banned your ass again.

That is a genious post miron_lang. You did not render an opinion but came up with a solid conclusion based on available evidence. Nobody can argue with that.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Fenster

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Nameless

This thread makes me want to fart violently on every single person who think that it wasn't a clear victory for JMM.

---

This thread unequivocally proves it wasn't a robbery.

Whether you/we think Marquez won or not is irrelevant. The facts are people were undecided on virtually EVERY round.

How can it possibly be a robbery if people can't even agree on who won what rounds? Utterly hilarious.

---

Now tell me that it is clear that Pacquiao won by 2 rounds. Everybody agrees (or almost) that Marquez won that hand down. The "not everybody agrees on the same round system" argument is one of the most ludicrous I've seen because for every damn match (except for the rare one sided whooping) the mass voting situation would be the same. Following that argument, we could turn down every robbery because in every case people wouldn't agree all on the same rounds.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by miron_lang

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Nameless

This thread makes me want to fart violently on every single person who think that it wasn't a clear victory for JMM.

---

That sounds like you want to be poetic or something. do you have 7 clear rounds for marquez?

---

Yes I have 7 rounds for Marquez (which i think he won clearly) and no, I don't make farty poetry though I can write one for you if you want.