Not a ROBBERY Please look :D

[Rantcatrat]

miron_lang that is a truly BRILLIANT post.

Impossible to argue against.

How can it possibly be a robbery if everyone is scoring rounds differently?

Great stuff.

I for once 100% agree with Fenster. It's difficult to argue that it was a robbery when 5 Saddo Posters scored so many rounds differently. It's clear as day the fight was close.

[:::PSL:::]

miron_lang that is a truly BRILLIANT post.

Impossible to argue against.

How can it possibly be a robbery if everyone is scoring rounds differently?

Great stuff.

I for once 100% agree with Fenster. It's difficult to argue that it was a robbery when 5 Saddo Posters scored so many rounds differently. It's clear as day the fight was close.

I hope this thread is an eye opener for Miles and anyone who thinks the fight was robbery.

Bilbo made a great point too on his recent thread. It seems like the official judges are more consistent than the average viewers.

[Nameless]

This thread makes me want to fart violently on every single person who think that it wasn't a clear victory for JMM.

[miron_lang]

This thread makes me want to fart violently on every single person who think that it wasn't a clear victory for JMM.

That sounds like you want to be poetic or something. do you have 7 clear rounds for marquez?

[Nameless]

This thread makes me want to fart violently on every single person who think that it wasn't a clear victory for JMM.

That sounds like you want to be poetic or something. do you have 7 clear rounds for marquez?

Yes I have 7 rounds for Marquez (which i think he won clearly) and no, I don't make farty poetry though I can write one for you if you want.

[miron_lang]

This thread makes me want to fart violently on every single person who think that it wasn't a clear victory for JMM.

That sounds like you want to be poetic or something. do you have 7 clear rounds for marquez?

Yes I have 7 rounds for Marquez (which i think he won clearly) and no, I don't make farty poetry though I can write one for you if you want.

What are those rounds that you thing Marquez clearly won? can you post it here pls?

[Fenster]

This thread makes me want to fart violently on every single person who think that it wasn't a clear victory for JMM.

This thread unequivocally proves it wasn't a robbery.

Whether you/we think Marquez won or not is irrelevant. The facts are people were undecided on virtually EVERY round.

How can it possibly be a robbery if people can't even agree on who won what rounds? Utterly hilarious.

[erics44]

i still havent seen the fight

but the bit about the expectation on pac rings true to me

everyone was saying he was gonna blast marquez, he obviously didnt and marquez's performace was a suprise, which perhaps gave him a few more points in peoples eyes

[FinitoElDinamita]

i still havent seen the fight

but the bit about the expectation on pac rings true to me

everyone was saying he was gonna blast marquez, he obviously didnt and marquez's performace was a suprise, which perhaps gave him a few more points in peoples eyes

No eric. It was a classic robjob and even 95% of other elite boxers out there agree.

U gotta watch the fight first before commenting.

[erics44]

i still havent seen the fight

but the bit about the expectation on pac rings true to me

everyone was saying he was gonna blast marquez, he obviously didnt and marquez's performace was a suprise, which perhaps gave him a few more points in peoples eyes

No eric. It was a classic robjob and even 95% of other elite boxers out there agree.

U gotta watch the fight first before commenting.

youre probly right

id like to watch it too but i cant find anywhere i can without paying for it

[Nameless]

This thread makes me want to fart violently on every single person who think that it wasn't a clear victory for JMM.

This thread unequivocally proves it wasn't a robbery.

Whether you/we think Marquez won or not is irrelevant. The facts are people were undecided on virtually EVERY round.

How can it possibly be a robbery if people can't even agree on who won what rounds? Utterly hilarious.

Now tell me that it is clear that Pacquiao won by 2 rounds. Everybody agrees (or almost) that Marquez won that hand down. The "not everybody agrees on the same round system" argument is one of the most ludicrous I've seen because for every damn match (except for the rare one sided whooping) the mass voting situation would be the same. Following that argument, we could turn down every robbery because in every case people wouldn't agree all on the same rounds.

[Fenster]

This thread makes me want to fart violently on every single person who think that it wasn't a clear victory for JMM.

This thread unequivocally proves it wasn't a robbery.

Whether you/we think Marquez won or not is irrelevant. The facts are people were undecided on virtually EVERY round.

How can it possibly be a robbery if people can't even agree on who won what rounds? Utterly hilarious.

Now tell me that it is clear that Pacquiao won by 2 rounds. Everybody agrees (or almost) that Marquez won that hand down. The "not everybody agrees on the same round system" argument is one of the most ludicrous I've seen because for every damn match (except for the rare one sided whooping) the mass voting situation would be the same. Following that argument, we could turn down every robbery because in every case people wouldn't agree all on the same rounds.

You score boxing matches by the round. The judges have to hand a score in at the end of every round.

In almost ALL robberies people will be in agreement on the exact rounds won. Real robberies are clear cut.

However, in this fight, the rounds were so ambiguous that FIVE random people, that scored it for Marquez, gave Pacquiao NINE different rounds between them.

Which means, even if the majority think Marquez won, it's highly probable using the WINNING Marquez scorecards to find Pac the winner. You can't argue with that.

NO robbery. Fact.

[generalbulldog]

This thread makes me want to fart violently on every single person who think that it wasn't a clear victory for JMM.

This thread unequivocally proves it wasn't a robbery.

Whether you/we think Marquez won or not is irrelevant. The facts are people were undecided on virtually EVERY round.

How can it possibly be a robbery if people can't even agree on who won what rounds? Utterly hilarious.

Now tell me that it is clear that Pacquiao won by 2 rounds. Everybody agrees (or almost) that Marquez won that hand down. The "not everybody agrees on the same round system" argument is one of the most ludicrous I've seen because for every damn match (except for the rare one sided whooping) the mass voting situation would be the same. Following that argument, we could turn down every robbery because in every case people wouldn't agree all on the same rounds.

You score boxing matches by the round. The judges have to hand a score in at the end of every round.

In almost ALL robberies people will be in agreement on the exact rounds won. Real robberies are clear cut.

However, in this fight, the rounds were so ambiguous that FIVE random people, that scored it for Marquez, gave Pacquiao NINE different rounds between them.

Which means, even if the majority think Marquez won, it's highly probable using the WINNING Marquez scorecards to find Pac the winner. You can't argue with that.

NO robbery. Fact.

Well I think that's it about this debate about the "robbery." You had a lot of ambiguous or very close rounds. People are acting like it's Holyfield-Lewis I or Whitaker-Chavez, now those are robberies.

[FinitoElDinamita]

psl, u dont know shit about boxing period. I know ur also a pactard troll from esb and boxingscrne cuz u sound just like them. Buncha annoying ass bums who dont know shit.

[:::PSL:::]

psl, u dont know shit about boxing period. I know ur also a pactard troll from esb and boxingscrne cuz u sound just like them. Buncha annoying ass bums who dont know shit.

Fukk you Milmascaras. And quit pretending like you're Korean. It's rediculous.

I hope they banned your ass again.