Printable View
Don't forget Broner was seemingly beaten by Ponce De Leon- a guy that is 5'5 while Ricky Burns is 5'10 and i reckon he would beat De Leon . Broner's last victory was impressive , but this guy can get outworked if it goes the distance. Still, if the fight was outside the U.K , Broner would have to be a slight favorite to win
Dont agree. Thats easily said in hindsight. What if Katsidis comes back and has a good win again. Will we look back in hindsight again and say Burns win was a decent one?Quote:
Originally Posted by FinitoElDinamita
ummm maybe because Marquez ruined Katsidis? Burns beat a badly faded one..Quote:
Originally Posted by TheMacMagicianSo the guy who had Marquez on his ass only two fights ago, the same Marquez who just beat Pacquiao, is "DONE" and Burns win over him, in his first fight at Lightweight, means very little. Shit talk that VD....Quote:
Originally Posted by Violent Demise
And your triangle theory doesnt work in Boxing and it doesnt mean anything.
It's true, Burns beating Kat dont mean much..
Fair point that one VD. Still think it was a good win for Burns though, especially in his first fight at lightweight. Katsidis barely laid a decent glove on Burns. Aside from Guerrero, no-one else can say that after they have faced Katsidis.Quote:
Originally Posted by Violent DemiseYes. Tell me Katsidis didn't pay dearly for dropping Marquez. That knock down was the only positive thing for Katsidis in that fight. Marquez beat on him the rest of the fight. By the 6th round you could see Marquez taking whatever Katsidis had left out of him. That he would never be the same. Sure enough, in his next fight he's barely competitive against GuererroQuote:
Originally Posted by TheMacMagicianSo the guy who had Marquez on his ass only two fights ago, the same Marquez who just beat Pacquiao, is "DONE" and Burns win over him, in his first fight at Lightweight, means very little. Shit talk that VD....Quote:
Originally Posted by Violent Demise
lol your having a girrafe , katstidis is very handy. wasnt his best night against burns but credit to rickster and im sure mike would say the same. burns wanted that fight, broner didnt . whats that tell you? rocky martinez everyone said the same and ricky surprised everyone even his hardcore fans, but dont get it twisted burns has far from peeked , keeps fit as fuck. k i think broner although heavy handed would get taken to skool. im tempted to say broner would underestimate him like rocky martinez did but he obviously didnt otherwise hed have fought himQuote:
Originally Posted by FinitoElDinamita
Broner flash and brash, seen plenty like him a legend in his
own front room, Come's across as a dick head.?
Burn's nothing flash or brash just get's the job done.;)
Broner does come off as a real jerkoff who's hard to root for..Quote:
Originally Posted by Dia bando
I think his next fight with Eloy Perez is dangerous for him.. Perez can very will win that fight..
I think Burns workrate gives Broner a tonne of trouble. Does it mean he will win the fight??? I really dont know but id like to see it.
lol Burns is too slow and sloppy to compete with Broner and he's not going to threaten anybody with that minimal punching power.Quote:
Originally Posted by fightscorecollector
It's a huge mismatch.. That's why he ran away from the challenge and faced the easier , faded Katsidis instead..
The hell he hasn't. He peeked in the Martinez fight. It's all downhill from there. It's reason he's kept crap opposition since winning the titleQuote:
Originally Posted by scubastevelol your having a girrafe , katstidis is very handy. wasnt his best night against burns but credit to rickster and im sure mike would say the same. burns wanted that fight, broner didnt . whats that tell you? rocky martinez everyone said the same and ricky surprised everyone even his hardcore fans, but dont get it twisted burns has far from peeked , keeps fit as fuck. k i think broner although heavy handed would get taken to skool. im tempted to say broner would underestimate him like rocky martinez did but he obviously didnt otherwise hed have fought himQuote:
Originally Posted by FinitoElDinamita
[QUOTE=Violent Demise;1042701]The hell he hasn't. He peeked in the Martinez fight. It's all downhill from there. It's reason he's kept crap opposition since winning the title[/QUOTE]Quote:
Originally Posted by scubastevelol your having a girrafe , katstidis is very handy. wasnt his best night against burns but credit to rickster and im sure mike would say the same. burns wanted that fight, broner didnt . whats that tell you? rocky martinez everyone said the same and ricky surprised everyone even his hardcore fans, but dont get it twisted burns has far from peeked , keeps fit as fuck. k i think broner although heavy handed would get taken to skool. im tempted to say broner would underestimate him like rocky martinez did but he obviously didnt otherwise hed have fought himQuote:
Originally Posted by FinitoElDinamita
Co-sign..
Truth is, Burns is just a glorified fringe contender level fighter.. He wont amount to much at 135..
Burns certainly isnt slow or sloppy ask Martinez and Katsidis about thatQuote:
Originally Posted by FinitoElDinamitalol Burns is too slow and sloppy to compete with Broner and he's not going to threaten anybody with that minimal punching power.Quote:
Originally Posted by fightscorecollector
It's a huge mismatch.. That's why he ran away from the challenge and faced the easier , faded Katsidis instead..
You sound pretty new to the sport.. Welcome, fella..Quote:
Originally Posted by fightscorecollectorBurns certainly isnt slow or sloppy ask Martinez and Katsidis about thatQuote:
Originally Posted by FinitoElDinamitalol Burns is too slow and sloppy to compete with Broner and he's not going to threaten anybody with that minimal punching power.Quote:
Originally Posted by fightscorecollector
It's a huge mismatch.. That's why he ran away from the challenge and faced the easier , faded Katsidis instead..
Certainly not new to the sport mate , certainly not looking for a slagging match either, but Burns is not slow.Quote:
Originally Posted by FinitoElDinamitaYou sound pretty new to the sport.. Welcome, fella..Quote:
Originally Posted by fightscorecollectorBurns certainly isnt slow or sloppy ask Martinez and Katsidis about thatQuote:
Originally Posted by FinitoElDinamitalol Burns is too slow and sloppy to compete with Broner and he's not going to threaten anybody with that minimal punching power.Quote:
Originally Posted by fightscorecollector
It's a huge mismatch.. That's why he ran away from the challenge and faced the easier , faded Katsidis instead..
Infact beating Katsidis and Martinez is better that what Broner has on his record...now am i right on that one?
ps: and to prove im a fair man...i read that the pic you have on your profile is your womans top half??...you are a lucky man , maybe i will get my woman to do that aswell lol..great idea
i aint been on this forum long but ive already identified you as the biggest shit talker going. it was broner that refused the burns fight. what planet are you from. also 1 thing burns is not is slow. give it a rest and dont come back untill you get your facts str8Quote:
Originally Posted by FinitoElDinamitalol Burns is too slow and sloppy to compete with Broner and he's not going to threaten anybody with that minimal punching power.Quote:
Originally Posted by fightscorecollector
It's a huge mismatch.. That's why he ran away from the challenge and faced the easier , faded Katsidis instead..
Fair enough.. Burns isn't terribly slow like Carlos Baldomir for instance but speed is definitely not his strong point.Quote:
Originally Posted by fightscorecollectorCertainly not new to the sport mate , certainly not looking for a slagging match either, but Burns is not slow.Quote:
Originally Posted by FinitoElDinamitaYou sound pretty new to the sport.. Welcome, fella..Quote:
Originally Posted by fightscorecollectorBurns certainly isnt slow or sloppy ask Martinez and Katsidis about thatQuote:
Originally Posted by FinitoElDinamitalol Burns is too slow and sloppy to compete with Broner and he's not going to threaten anybody with that minimal punching power.Quote:
Originally Posted by fightscorecollector
It's a huge mismatch.. That's why he ran away from the challenge and faced the easier , faded Katsidis instead..
Infact beating Katsidis and Martinez is better that what Broner has on his record...now am i right on that one?
ps: and to prove im a fair man...i read that the pic you have on your profile is your womans top half??...you are a lucky man , maybe i will get my woman to do that aswell lol..great idea
Roman Martinez himself is fairly slow and limited yet he was able to knock Burns down in the first round... Most fighters with reasonable speed wouldn't get caught by a slow, lead right hand so early in the fight..
And the reason why I say he's sloppy is because dude eats alot of unnecessary punches while switching from offense to defense. He doesn't switch modes with fluidity which is why he gets hit by shots he shouldnt be getting hit with..
I do agree that Burns has a better record than Broner though.. Not by much, but he does...
BTW thanks for the compliment bruh.. ;D