How would have Ricky Burns done against Broner?

**FinitoElDinamita** · 11-24-2011 06:04 PM

Originally Posted by TheMacMagician

Originally Posted by Violent Demise

He would of been stopped in 1. Katsidis was already done. Win over him means very little

So the guy who had Marquez on his ass only two fights ago, the same Marquez who just beat Pacquiao, is "DONE" and Burns win over him, in his first fight at Lightweight, means very little. Shit talk that VD....

ummm maybe because Marquez ruined Katsidis? Burns beat a badly faded one..

And your triangle theory doesnt work in Boxing and it doesnt mean anything.

It's true, Burns beating Kat dont mean much..

**TheMacMagician** · 11-25-2011 02:02 PM

Originally Posted by FinitoElDinamita

Originally Posted by TheMacMagician

Originally Posted by Violent Demise

He would of been stopped in 1. Katsidis was already done. Win over him means very little

So the guy who had Marquez on his ass only two fights ago, the same Marquez who just beat Pacquiao, is "DONE" and Burns win over him, in his first fight at Lightweight, means very little. Shit talk that VD....

ummm maybe because Marquez ruined Katsidis? Burns beat a badly faded one..

And your triangle theory doesnt work in Boxing and it doesnt mean anything.

It's true, Burns beating Kat dont mean much..

Dont agree. Thats easily said in hindsight. What if Katsidis comes back and has a good win again. Will we look back in hindsight again and say Burns win was a decent one?