Not as good but JMM better prepare like it is Money. Just watch him on YouTube. I sense a upset.Quote:
Originally Posted by J_C
Printable View
Not as good but JMM better prepare like it is Money. Just watch him on YouTube. I sense a upset.Quote:
Originally Posted by J_C
I thought a Mexico match with Alvarado was being worked up, wouldn't have been too bad.
Props to him for staying busy and not sitting around on his arse waiting for the dust to settle. Wouldn't put to much stock in only 1 ko. Guys unknown but is either a back peddling Zuri Lawrence in a 140 body or some seriously awkward type? Alot to lose in these...cuts, crap styles that make you in turn look crap and kill that fresh momentum of going even up or better with Manny and marketability. Who knows, or he sparks the guy in one and we get some undercard action ;D
Argentine huh. Hide the chairs and bottles :-X
There's no bias in that at all. /sarcasmQuote:
Originally Posted by ElTerribleMoralesdon't get what the :-X is for, when it's not opinion it's fact that he handed Pacquiao his ass 3 times, there's a reason why Manny picked Bradley over Marquez, he's just gonna try and do the same thing he's done already which is wait out as much time before his next fight with Marquez to hope that JMM grows old and Manny can finally actually beat himQuote:
Originally Posted by Pavlik
Whats that based on?Quote:
Originally Posted by cnote111
Juan was once proven and wanted to fight champions (mostly calling out for Mexican ones) but was ignored for a fair while. Maybe he is looking at this guys skills in the same light :-\ .Quote:
Originally Posted by Ant LiveNot as good but JMM better prepare like it is Money. Just watch him on YouTube. I sense a upset.Quote:
Originally Posted by J_C
same can be said about Pavlik's post, and history speaks for itself, every time Marquez and Pacquiao fight, Marquez gets the best of Manny then get's screwed on the cards, afterwards Marquez calls Pacquiao out...again, and Manny makes him jump through hoops for 3 yrs...again it's not a matter of opinion, the shit's already happened beforeQuote:
Originally Posted by Slim the BoxingManiacThere's no bias in that at all. /sarcasmQuote:
Originally Posted by ElTerribleMoralesdon't get what the :-X is for, when it's not opinion it's fact that he handed Pacquiao his ass 3 times, there's a reason why Manny picked Bradley over Marquez, he's just gonna try and do the same thing he's done already which is wait out as much time before his next fight with Marquez to hope that JMM grows old and Manny can finally actually beat himQuote:
Originally Posted by Pavlik
As some of you know I'm a big JMM fan but I dont like the fight one bit...
OK, it's a stay busy fight I get it but with other more know names out there I think a more known opponent could have been found.
I actually listed Cuenca as a fighter to look out for:
2010
Quote:
Originally Posted by CutMeMick
2011
Since 2010 I have seen 2 versions of Cuenca.Quote:
Originally Posted by CutMeMick
The 1st one is when he's at his best which is mobile and coming forward.
The 2nd being stiff and just waiting around for his opponent.
If the 1st one shows up it can make for an interesting fight and with JMM's style we might see some fireworks.
If the 2nd one shows up then JMM will outclass him in every aspect I believe.
OK, so after the stay-busy fight, it seems to me there are a number of pretty big and pretty good fights that will be ready and theoretically possible (and I have absolutely no interest in a 4th Pac fight -- we all know exactly how that goes).
- Guerrero
- Morales
- winner of Gamboa/Rios
- winner of Kahn/Peterson II
- winner of Alexander/Maidana
I'd love to see any of those 5 fights! Hopefully one of them gets made.
P.S. Thanks for the info on Cuenca, Mick. I'm not ashamed to admit that I've never heard of the guy and knew absolutely nothing about him other than his presumably puffed-up record.
I'm not about to claim that Pac "owned" Marquez. Because he didn't.Quote:
Originally Posted by ElTerribleMoralessame can be said about Pavlik's post, and history speaks for itself, every time Marquez and Pacquiao fight, Marquez gets the best of Manny then get's screwed on the cards, afterwards Marquez calls Pacquiao out...again, and Manny makes him jump through hoops for 3 yrs...again it's not a matter of opinion, the shit's already happened beforeQuote:
Originally Posted by Slim the BoxingManiacThere's no bias in that at all. /sarcasmQuote:
Originally Posted by ElTerribleMoralesdon't get what the :-X is for, when it's not opinion it's fact that he handed Pacquiao his ass 3 times, there's a reason why Manny picked Bradley over Marquez, he's just gonna try and do the same thing he's done already which is wait out as much time before his next fight with Marquez to hope that JMM grows old and Manny can finally actually beat himQuote:
Originally Posted by Pavlik
But you have to understand that the fight was extremely close. It could have gone either way. If you think otherwise, you're simply biased.
You cannot logically indicate that Marquez was robbed in his third bout with Pacquaio.
You can and it has been done. That is all.:-)Quote:
Originally Posted by Slim the BoxingManiacI'm not about to claim that Pac "owned" Marquez. Because he didn't.Quote:
Originally Posted by ElTerribleMoralessame can be said about Pavlik's post, and history speaks for itself, every time Marquez and Pacquiao fight, Marquez gets the best of Manny then get's screwed on the cards, afterwards Marquez calls Pacquiao out...again, and Manny makes him jump through hoops for 3 yrs...again it's not a matter of opinion, the shit's already happened beforeQuote:
Originally Posted by Slim the BoxingManiacThere's no bias in that at all. /sarcasmQuote:
Originally Posted by ElTerribleMoralesdon't get what the :-X is for, when it's not opinion it's fact that he handed Pacquiao his ass 3 times, there's a reason why Manny picked Bradley over Marquez, he's just gonna try and do the same thing he's done already which is wait out as much time before his next fight with Marquez to hope that JMM grows old and Manny can finally actually beat himQuote:
Originally Posted by Pavlik
But you have to understand that the fight was extremely close. It could have gone either way. If you think otherwise, you're simply biased.
You cannot logically indicate that Marquez was robbed in his third bout with Pacquaio.
HE'll prolly take a tuneup and face the winner of Rios-Gamboa in the summer..
Whoever he faces, I just hope he fights soon.. MArquez could be fighting a total bum or the 50ft giant woman with her titties all hanging out, Ill always tune in cuz watching him is like poetry in motion.. His style is so fuckin beautiful, I get choked up whenever he throws a punch..
Marquez is the greatest Mexican fighter of all time.. straight up..
Marquez easily beats both versionsQuote:
Originally Posted by CutMeMickAs some of you know I'm a big JMM fan but I dont like the fight one bit...
OK, it's a stay busy fight I get it but with other more know names out there I think a more known opponent could have been found.
I actually listed Cuenca as a fighter to look out for:
2010
Quote:
Originally Posted by CutMeMick
2011
Since 2010 I have seen 2 versions of Cuenca.Quote:
Originally Posted by CutMeMick
The 1st one is when he's at his best which is mobile and coming forward.
The 2nd being stiff and just waiting around for his opponent.
If the 1st one shows up it can make for an interesting fight and with JMM's style we might see some fireworks.
If the 2nd one shows up then JMM will outclass him in every aspect I believe.