Quote Originally Posted by ElTerribleMorales View Post
Quote Originally Posted by Slim the BoxingManiac View Post
Quote Originally Posted by ElTerribleMorales View Post
Quote Originally Posted by Pavlik View Post
what else does he have to prove he practically beat PAC
don't get what the is for, when it's not opinion it's fact that he handed Pacquiao his ass 3 times, there's a reason why Manny picked Bradley over Marquez, he's just gonna try and do the same thing he's done already which is wait out as much time before his next fight with Marquez to hope that JMM grows old and Manny can finally actually beat him
There's no bias in that at all. /sarcasm
same can be said about Pavlik's post, and history speaks for itself, every time Marquez and Pacquiao fight, Marquez gets the best of Manny then get's screwed on the cards, afterwards Marquez calls Pacquiao out...again, and Manny makes him jump through hoops for 3 yrs...again it's not a matter of opinion, the shit's already happened before
I'm not about to claim that Pac "owned" Marquez. Because he didn't.

But you have to understand that the fight was extremely close. It could have gone either way. If you think otherwise, you're simply biased.

You cannot logically indicate that Marquez was robbed in his third bout with Pacquaio.