Quote:
Originally Posted by Master
Hahaha what part you don't like? The steroid cheat? Hahahha
Printable View
Quote:
Originally Posted by Master
Hahaha what part you don't like? The steroid cheat? Hahahha
Yes and the third option was funny.Quote:
Originally Posted by BeanflickerQuote:
Originally Posted by Master
Hahaha what part you don't like? The steroid cheat? Hahahha
Lol@ the choices. Never seen an opinion put into a multiple choice question quite like it.
These two are not even in the same end of the pool and there are people on here calling Geale a B fighter lol.
Not everybody is Moore or Hopkins and if he's around long enough he could get beat by somebody who couldn't carry his jock strap. That 50/0 mark is a mountain.
I don't know anything about boxing I guess because I want to see Maidana 2. The first fight never did a million buys but I'd bet the second does close to 1.5 so it's a gold mine financially. Its also his worst showing since Castillo 1 against a guy lets face it, that should have been a cake walk. At this time in his career and if he has any concerns with legacy imo he needs to get this fight. If he does a poll, I bet its a runaway.
I think Floyds fixated on the Cotto/Martinez winner but that cant happen on Sept 13. Three months is not enough time for either man. I think the public pressure will build and aside from the phantom fight there really is no bigger fight. Khan would do ok but its the added difficulty Maidana gave him the makes the rematch huge.
Thurman is entering into that foggy land of overrating and or overstating this early on to me. I need to see a helluva less loading up, posturing for a bomb and getting caught with throw away shots from the likes of slow motion Diaz and Soto Karrass before I'd suggest he demolishes a Mayweather, or a Porter for that matter.
I don't think I'm biased at all but take that opinion with a grain of salt because I might be biased.Quote:
Originally Posted by MasterYes and the third option was funny.Quote:
Originally Posted by BeanflickerQuote:
Originally Posted by Master
Hahaha what part you don't like? The steroid cheat? Hahahha
Think both might be too green for Floyd at this point, but Porter will be tough to beat right now. Such an awkward style n he is very fast, athletic, strong, and aggressive. Not quite as talented as Roy was, but WAY more physical n aggressive. Bad style match up for Floyd, especially now. That being said, Floyd is a great fighter n extremely experienced so I would still bet on him. I like Thurman, but he isn't ready n I think Floyd picks him apart n dominates him. Thurman is a good puncher, but Floyd will be too slick n pick him apart. Better style match up for Floyd.
Forget Floyd. Porter and Thurman should fight each other
Floyd is going to rematch Maidana...and there shouldn't be anyone who has any issues with that. People keep pining for the Khan fight...but Khan has plenty of other options: a Garcia rematch, a fight with Broner, etc. Porter and Thurman are young and have potential...but they aren't quite there yet. Anyone who thinks either of them "would beat Mayweather's ass" doesn't know their head from their ass.
I would love to see Broner v Khan. I think Broner would be outclassed. I want to see Broner being someone the young bucks fight as they solidify themselves in the pros. I want to see Khan put him on that path.
A Floyd v Maidana rematch gotta be interesting. Would Floyd come in and completely dominate. That is what I was originally thinking, Floyd had faced Maidana and a rematch would not serve Maidana well but Maidana isn't going in there thinking that. I wouldn't go as far as saying Floyd will lose but I think he will have a tough time winning. Sure Floyd picked up somethings facing Maidana but Maidana did the same. I think it will be another interesting fight.
You are fast becoming Brockton Mk. II minus the obvious tounge in cheek.Quote:
Originally Posted by Beanflicker
Pipe down I got more legacy here than you do.Quote:
Originally Posted by jahmezYou are fast becoming Brockton Mk. II minus the obvious tounge in cheek.Quote:
Originally Posted by Beanflicker
Lol so does 95% of the board, nothing to be proud of
My initial thought was a simple no.
But the more I think about it the more complex it gets. These guys are young. They are large welterweights. They have power. They have speed. Each has the ability to put a plan in place and execute said plan. And each has shown the ability to adjust at least somewhat.
Floyd is old. He's not a large welterweight although he has grown into the division. And these kids grew up watching his every move. Thurman says every fight he prepares to fight Floyd. That kind of singular focus can't be discounted.
I'd take Floyd to beat either unless he looks off in the Maidana rematch but I wouldn't count these kids out.
Agreed and the lack of Pac in this converation is no surprise. No wayQuote:
Originally Posted by Violent Demise
Pac huggers welcome this possible KO /beating after JMM KO . Pac is a welterweight champion too but of course its' all about bashing Mayweather and having him lose the "0" by this pro PAC forum. Pack should fight one of these bucs first after he is a marque name that was recently KTFO. Mayweather is side "A" and Pac is side "B" after JMM loss. So this talk should be of one of these two young powerful champions fighting Pac first !!! Then moving onto Mayweather.
1) Yes these guys would smash Pacquiao
2) No these guys are not Pacquiao class,these guys have to lose to Money first before qualifying to fight Pac.
3) I don't know a lot about boxing so I wanna see Pac fight another opponent coming off a loss, at a catch weight or all of the above so I can keep posting like I know something about boxing.
4) Pacquiao may be a washed up steroid cheat that just overcame fear of needles and new VADA kickback sponsor , but I worship him and his mommas hex's. I will defend him no matter what facts are presented.
You forgot to run spell check so I am kind enough to do it for you