Thurman is entering into that foggy land of overrating and or overstating this early on to me. I need to see a helluva less loading up, posturing for a bomb and getting caught with throw away shots from the likes of slow motion Diaz and Soto Karrass before I'd suggest he demolishes a Mayweather, or a Porter for that matter.
1) Yes these guys would smash Pacquiao
2) No these guys are not Pacquiao class,these guys have to lose to Money first before qualifying to fight Pac.
3) I don't know a lot about boxing so I wanna see Pac fight another opponent coming off a loss, at a catch weight or all of the above so I can keep posting like I know something about boxing.
4) Pacquiao may be a washed up steroid cheat that just overcame fear of needles and new VADA kickback sponsor , but I worship him and his mommas hex's. I will defend him no matter what facts are presented.
You forgot to run spell check so I am kind enough to do it for you
My initial thought was a simple no.
But the more I think about it the more complex it gets. These guys are young. They are large welterweights. They have power. They have speed. Each has the ability to put a plan in place and execute said plan. And each has shown the ability to adjust at least somewhat.
Floyd is old. He's not a large welterweight although he has grown into the division. And these kids grew up watching his every move. Thurman says every fight he prepares to fight Floyd. That kind of singular focus can't be discounted.
I'd take Floyd to beat either unless he looks off in the Maidana rematch but I wouldn't count these kids out.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks