Printable View
For me it is HAMED V M.A.B ,when I first saw the fight with all Hamed's ALLAH this ALLAH that ,he of course he was handed his ass by MAB at the time is was shocking and a little funny.
Now when I look at the fight from the intro's I find the outcome of each round and the conclusion fucking hilarious and satisfying .
It was me who scored it 7 - 5 to Floyd and I am not Mexican. I stand by it.Quote:
Originally Posted by Ron Swanson
95% of the non mexican World thinks Alvarez won at the absolute most 2 rounds and most think less than 2. You will find more people that think he won 0 rounds than people that think it was a draw. So anyone saying it was a draw or can even be argued is being ridiculous. The fight wasn't remotely close or debatable. But i guess after May 2nd any ridiculous claim can be made. I'll go watch Floyd smack Alvarez around again now and try desperately to find 3 rounds for Alvarez in the honor of proposterous draw claims.Quote:
Originally Posted by Jimanuel BoogustusLOL okay bud. Thanks for contributing.Quote:
Originally Posted by Ron SwansonBecause it is ridiculous.Quote:
Originally Posted by Jimanuel BoogustusFirstly, I would say that the first score that you come up with is really the only score that matters but you can watch a fight and completely misinterpret the context of the fight.Quote:
Originally Posted by Primo CarneraIn what respect? How did you think it looked 2nd time round? I ask because I watched this once, but I was in another country with no commentary, and I thought Floyd won every round. Should I be watching it again?Quote:
Originally Posted by Jimanuel Boogustus
First time around, I saw Canelo retreating and looking confused, second time around, I saw Canelo doing a mediocre job of not falling for Mayweather's traps. Also there were many occasions where Mayweather was being hit but showed great composure - where first time around I didn't even acknowledged that he'd been caught. In this view I can understand how he could have been given a draw.
Honestly though, I think someone else on here said it was close and thought it was ridiculous until I watched it again.
I think if I watch both fights one more time I would have Mercer winning a shut-out UD. lolol...Quote:
Originally Posted by SlimTraeLOL, I concur. I think I was biased for both guys, yet Mercer keeps changing my dvd. Can't be me changing my mind!!Quote:
Originally Posted by ykdadamajaEverytime I see Lewis/Mercer and Holyfield/Mercer, I give Mercer an extra round every time I see both fights. lolol....Quote:
Originally Posted by SlimTrae
Jesus Christ, Ron do yourself a favour - don't bother. You've got yourself all wound up because you've misunderstood my point. I'm not trying to make claims here. That would be daft. I could watch that fight again and see it a different way. I'm not going to though. The point has already been made. It can happen.Quote:
Originally Posted by Ron Swanson95% of the non mexican World thinks Alvarez won at the absolute most 2 rounds and most think less than 2. You will find more people that think he won 0 rounds than people that think it was a draw. So anyone saying it was a draw or can even be argued is being ridiculous. The fight wasn't remotely close or debatable. But i guess after May 2nd any ridiculous claim can be made. I'll go watch Floyd smack Alvarez around again now and try desperately to find 3 rounds for Alvarez in the honor of proposterous draw claims.Quote:
Originally Posted by Jimanuel BoogustusLOL okay bud. Thanks for contributing.Quote:
Originally Posted by Ron SwansonBecause it is ridiculous.Quote:
Originally Posted by Jimanuel BoogustusFirstly, I would say that the first score that you come up with is really the only score that matters but you can watch a fight and completely misinterpret the context of the fight.Quote:
Originally Posted by Primo CarneraIn what respect? How did you think it looked 2nd time round? I ask because I watched this once, but I was in another country with no commentary, and I thought Floyd won every round. Should I be watching it again?Quote:
Originally Posted by Jimanuel Boogustus
First time around, I saw Canelo retreating and looking confused, second time around, I saw Canelo doing a mediocre job of not falling for Mayweather's traps. Also there were many occasions where Mayweather was being hit but showed great composure - where first time around I didn't even acknowledged that he'd been caught. In this view I can understand how he could have been given a draw.
Honestly though, I think someone else on here said it was close and thought it was ridiculous until I watched it again.
~ 95% of the Mexican World ~Quote:
Originally Posted by Ron Swanson95% of the non mexican World thinks Alvarez won at the absolute most 2 rounds and most think less than 2. You will find more people that think he won 0 rounds than people that think it was a draw. So anyone saying it was a draw or can even be argued is being ridiculous. The fight wasn't remotely close or debatable. But i guess after May 2nd any ridiculous claim can be made. I'll go watch Floyd smack Alvarez around again now and try desperately to find 3 rounds for Alvarez in the honor of proposterous draw claims.Quote:
Originally Posted by Jimanuel BoogustusLOL okay bud. Thanks for contributing.Quote:
Originally Posted by Ron SwansonBecause it is ridiculous.Quote:
Originally Posted by Jimanuel BoogustusFirstly, I would say that the first score that you come up with is really the only score that matters but you can watch a fight and completely misinterpret the context of the fight.Quote:
Originally Posted by Primo CarneraIn what respect? How did you think it looked 2nd time round? I ask because I watched this once, but I was in another country with no commentary, and I thought Floyd won every round. Should I be watching it again?Quote:
Originally Posted by Jimanuel Boogustus
First time around, I saw Canelo retreating and looking confused, second time around, I saw Canelo doing a mediocre job of not falling for Mayweather's traps. Also there were many occasions where Mayweather was being hit but showed great composure - where first time around I didn't even acknowledged that he'd been caught. In this view I can understand how he could have been given a draw.
Honestly though, I think someone else on here said it was close and thought it was ridiculous until I watched it again.
Just where is that World located.
I believe you have exposed yourself as a somewhat of 'a bigot'.
Is this why Eddie Van Halen left her, damn girl...let those cupcakes go.Quote:
Originally Posted by Bill Paxtom
Adamak vs Briggs II.
1st time watching it fight II, I scored it 7-5 like the 1st fight.
Not as good as the first bout as Adamak just couldn't outslug him this time- bleeding profusely, he did boxed his way to the 12th.
judge: Mauro Di Fiore 113-113, Ray Hawkins 115-111, Ken Morita 114-112
Last two times I watched it- it was a draw. Couldn't give Adamak a 7th round.
I believe it was because of all those 1:00 AM in the morning trips to >Quote:
Originally Posted by SlimTraeIs this why Eddie Van Halen left her, damn girl...let those cupcakes go.Quote:
Originally Posted by Bill Paxtom
'In-N-Out Burger'
https://encrypted-tbn3.gstatic.com/i...rOqVy-W6VRlVaw
First of all it was a good fight. A few rounds were close but it was not a close fight, in my opinion. Do any of you remember what Canelo said post fight? He said, "I couldn't find him." That means he couldn't run him down, he couldn't walk him down, he couldn't keep him on the ropes, and he couldn't keep him in a corner. When a good fighter like Canelo says something like that, you know that fighter was beat convincingly.Quote:
Originally Posted by Jimanuel BoogustusFirstly, I would say that the first score that you come up with is really the only score that matters but you can watch a fight and completely misinterpret the context of the fight.Quote:
Originally Posted by Primo CarneraIn what respect? How did you think it looked 2nd time round? I ask because I watched this once, but I was in another country with no commentary, and I thought Floyd won every round. Should I be watching it again?Quote:
Originally Posted by Jimanuel Boogustus
First time around, I saw Canelo retreating and looking confused, second time around, I saw Canelo doing a mediocre job of not falling for Mayweather's traps. Also there were many occasions where Mayweather was being hit but showed great composure - where first time around I didn't even acknowledged that he'd been caught. In this view I can understand how he could have been given a draw.
Honestly though, I think someone else on here said it was close and thought it was ridiculous until I watched it again.
Dude! That's Roseanne Barr, or maybe Rosie O'Donnell! LOLQuote:
Originally Posted by Bill Paxtom
I'm surprised Floyd-Canelo has gotten as much attention as it has in this particular thread. I personally couldn't say how I'd view it differently, because I'd rather watch paint dry than to watch Floyd totally shut out Canelo again. The hype was incredible.... the fight was piss poor. It brought out the fact that Canelo didn't belong in the ring with Floyd in the first place. The only other "hype vs. real fight" letdown was Floyd-Pac... and at least Pac was able to actually hit Floyd a few times during the fight.
;D sooooo, are you saying you have surprised yourself then or...
DLH/Whitaker. I watched it when I first started watching boxing and thought Oscar won it easy, because I got caught up in the commentators bias and Lampley's tendency to call Oscar's missed/blocked punches as landed punches. When I watched again years later when I knew more about boxing, I realized it was way closer, arguably a Whitaker win.
Yeah but that says a lot about Floyd, doesn't it? That he could go up a weight class and dominate a guy who was #1 there and over 20lbs heavier than him on fight night. Canelo is no joke and Mayweather made him look like a bum.Quote:
Originally Posted by TitoFan
Manny v Floyd, I now see it as many winning by shut out.